Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Meadows Care Limited in Birmingham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group AI-checked
Meadows Care Limited
- Inspection date verified
2 Nov 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Christy Wannop
- Name on report verified
1240936
- URN verified
1240936
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure the children’s home works with the local authority to make sure the young people they are responsible for are getting the support they need to participate. p.4
- For further information see ‘Participation of young people: education, employment and training’, www.gov.uk/government/publications/participation-of- young-people-education-employment-and-training. p.4
- Ensure managers anticipate difficulties and review incidents, such as learning from disruptions and placement breakdowns. p.4
- They are responsible for proactively implementing lessons learned and sustaining good practice. p.4
- In particular, demonstrate managerial review of the quality of response when children go missing from care and the delivery of placement aims against the local authority plan when evaluating placement success, once children move on. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 294
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: 1240936 1 Registered provider: Meadows Care Limited Interim inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This children’s home provides care for three children who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. It is one of four that are owned and operated by a private company under a contract with a local authority.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Judgement at last inspection: Requires improvement to be good
p.1
and young people since the most recent full inspection
This home was judged requires improvement to be good at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has sustained effectiveness.
p.1
and young people since the most recent full inspection
This interim inspection was brought forward. Ofsted received concerns from several sources about the quality of care, safeguarding and the quality of management. Ofsted asked the responsible individual to investigate these matters. He made a full response which identified some shortfalls. The inspector considered these issues at this inspection and found that the area manager and new home manager had made progress in addressing all the issues identified by the responsible individual.
p.1
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The progress and experiences of children since the last inspection are variable. Staff have struggled to engage children, manage their challenges and improve their outcomes since the home opened. Children have not always had school or alternative education provision. They have gone missing, been bullied and have offended. Staff have made Inspection report children’s home: 1240936 2 great efforts to change children’s entrenched behaviour. Despite careful matching of new admissions, the varied needs of children have proved difficult to manage. Bullying reached a peak in September, resulting in one child being serious assaulted by another child. The placements of three children have broken down after linked incidents.
p.1
and young people since the most recent full inspection
One child continues to experience stability. His family and friends are welcomed, and this has helped him to develop a positive identity. Two new children have recently moved in at short notice after placement breakdowns elsewhere. The placing social worker of one was realistic that staff at this home could make a difference despite all their efforts.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The arrangements for child protection and the staff’s response to children are better. Staff action has now reduced bullying and made sure that children are safer online and when they go missing from care. Staff now understand and implement safeguarding policies. Staff have worked to protect and minimise the impact of bullying, and training is planned.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
Staff input is still not always clear in the records that staff produce about incidents or the work that they do to improve children’s well-being after bullying and when children go missing from care. The new manager has delayed her evaluation of ‘missing’ incidents because of having to wait for the local authority to conduct return home interviews. Her monitoring does not yet show that she has escalated her concerns when these important information-gathering interviews are delayed or are not undertaken
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The registered manager now works in another of the provider’s children’s homes, and not in a managerial capacity. The registered person appointed a new manager in July 2017. She has applied to register with Ofsted. Staff turnover and shortages have put strain on the remaining members of the staff team. The responsible individual is still supporting the home with agency staff until staffing sufficiency, experience and skill on each shift can be guaranteed, including at shift leader and managements level.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
Recent internal and external monitoring has identified and improved the quality of care and professional practice. Staff say that the quality of their line management and supervision has improved under the new manager. Managerial tracking of educational attendance and outcomes has recently begun, and managers now meet with local authority education officers every three months to discuss children’s progress. The new manager has successfully challenged the placing authority when it has not supported children by regular visits. However, learning after placement breakdown is not yet evident in her managerial reports.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The new manager has taken action in conjunction with the area manager in relation to six of the seven previous requirements. Further work is essential to provide a sufficient, skilled staff team that delivers continuity of care to children.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The staff now protect children effectively. They assess risks carefully and take action to reduce unnecessary risk. Children now receive effectively planned care. Children’s needs, including their anxiety and mental health, are now met. Better daily routines are now helping children to have sufficient sleep. All children are now up and ready for their day. Inspection report children’s home: 1240936 3 All staff now have regular recorded supervision with their manager and meet together for regular team meetings, which are attended by the organisation’s psychologist. Staff now have up-to-date statutory information about children’s placement plans, health, and educational needs and goals. The registered person now makes sure that all significant incidents are notified to Ofsted. There has now been consultation with children, parents, placing authorities and staff about the children’s home, its facilities and the quality of
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
care. This tells the registered person that the service is moving in the right direction.
p.3
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
13/06/2017 Full Requires improvement to be good Inspection report children’s home: 1240936 4
p.3
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.4
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that helps children aspire to fulfil their potential and promotes their welfare. In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child; ensure that the home has sufficient staff to provide care for each child; ensure that the home’s workforce provides continuity of care to each child. (Regulation 13(1), (2)(c)(d)(e)) 31/01/2018
p.4
Recommendations
Ensure the children’s home works with the local authority to make sure the young people they are responsible for are getting the support they need to participate. For further information see ‘Participation of young people: education, employment and training’, www.gov.uk/government/publications/participation-of- young-people-education-employment-and-training. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 28, paragraph 5.17) Ensure managers anticipate difficulties and review incidents, such as learning from disruptions and placement breakdowns. They are responsible for proactively implementing lessons learned and sustaining good practice. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 55, paragraph 10.24)
p.4
Recommendations
In particular, demonstrate managerial review of the quality of response when children go missing from care and the delivery of placement aims against the local authority plan when evaluating placement success, once children move on. Inspection report children’s home: 1240936 5
p.4
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: 1240936 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Meadows Care Limited, Egerton House, Wardle Road, Rochdale OL12 9EN
p.6
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Niel Shelmerdine
p.6
Inspector
Christy Wannop, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: 1240936 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion