Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Leeds

Inspected 31 Oct 2017 · published 22 Nov 2017 · URN 319822

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Helen Royston

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    31 Oct 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Helen Royston

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    319822

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−28Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressenjoyeffectiveconsistentsensitively
Criticismnot alwaysfailedbreachconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings37w0
  • What needs to improve738w−28

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
735
about usual (typical 743)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%What needs to improve 59%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 31 October 2017 21 August 2013

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 The childminder has failed to notify Ofsted of all people over the age of 16 years old who are working on the premises. This is also a breach to the Childcare Register requirements.  The childminder has failed to keep her knowledge and skills sufficiently up to date regarding current legislation and early years practice.  The childminder is not monitoring children's progress rigorously enough. Activities are not always challenging enough to support children to make good progress.  The childminder does not complete the progress check for children aged between two and three years. She is not aware of the requirement to provide parents with a written summary of children's progress in the prime areas of learning.  The childminder does not encourage parents to contribute information to children's on- going learning and assessment, to fully promote consistency in children's development.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder and her assistants have developed close relationships with the children. This helps to promote children's personal, social and emotional development.  Children behave well. The childminder gives them consistent praise for their achievements. This helps children to grow in confidence and self-esteem.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 inform Ofsted of all persons aged 16 years or over who are living or working on the premises 17/11/2017

p.2

Due Date

 update training and skills to improve knowledge of current legislation and early years practice 17/11/2017

p.2

Due Date

 monitor the progress that children are making and use this information to plan challenging activities that support children to make good progress 17/11/2017

p.2

Due Date

 review children's progress aged between two and three years and provide parents with a written summary of their child's development in the prime areas of learning. 17/11/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 encourage parents to contribute information to children's on-going learning and assessment to help promote continuity in children's development.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the childminder and had discussions at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector took account of parent's views recorded in the childminder's compliments file.  The inspector spoke to children during the inspection.  The inspector looked at a range of documents, such as policies and procedures, training records and children's observations and assessments. The inspector discussed self- evaluation with the childminder.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

The childminder and her assistants attend some professional development opportunities. However, they have not kept their knowledge sufficiently up to date regarding current legislation and early years practice. Activities do not always specifically support what children need to learn next. For example, children predict whether items will float or sink in water, however the childminder does not challenge them further to understand why this happens. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder and her assistants know how to spot signs and symptoms of child abuse. They understand what action to take if they have concerns about a child's welfare. Overall, the childminder reflects on the quality of her setting. She has discussions with her assistants to identify any improvements needed in their practice.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

The childminder does not complete the required progress check for children aged between two and three years, or provide parents with a written summary of their progress. However, she observes children and plans some activities to support their interests. For example, children enjoy a walk in the local area and collect a variety of autumn items. The childminder and her assistants promote children's listening and communication skills. For example, they encourage children to listen for sounds, such as horses riding by. They describe the shape, colour and smell of different objects. The childminder does not encourage parents to contribute their own information to children's on-going learning and assessment. However, she keeps parents informed about their children's day, including through a daily diary.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

The childminder has not informed Ofsted of an assistant who is working on the premises. However, Ofsted are now aware and there is no impact on children's safety because the assistant is never on her own with children and she has a Disclosure and Barring Service check in place. Children spend time outdoors and go on trips in the local area. They develop their physical skills, for example, riding on scooters and playing with bats and balls. The childminder and her assistant respond to children's care needs sensitively. For example, they teach children how to blow their nose and wash their hands thoroughly.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

The childminder does not monitor children's progress rigorously enough. She does not always closely match activities to children's level of development and children do not make good enough progress. However, they develop some key skills in preparation for their move on to school and are generally motivated to join in activities. For example, they enjoy being imaginative and creative, such as decorating pumpkins with paint and glitter.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 319822 Local authority Leeds Inspection number 1064100 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 12 Total number of places 18 Number of children on roll 12

p.4

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 21 August 2013

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 1992 and lives in Scholes on the outskirts of Leeds. The childminder has three assistants who work with her when needed. She operates all year round from 7.30am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except bank holidays and family holidays.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion