Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Hart Plain Church Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Hart Plain Church Pre School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP517963
- Inspection date verified
31 Oct 2017
- Inspectors verified
Julie Bruce
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PO8 8RG
- Name on report verified
Hart Plain Church Pre- School
- URN verified
110111
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There are serious weaknesses in the methods the manager uses to reflect on practice. p.3
- Children's safety and well-being are compromised by breaches in the welfare requirements. p.3
- They are unable to identify children at risk of radical views. p.1
- In addition, the manager knows there are security weaknesses at the setting. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- take all reasonable steps to minimise risks to children in the environment, particularly in relation to the baby room 01/11/2017 p.2
- improve security of the provision so that only authorised people are able to gain access to the setting 28/11/2017 p.2
- provide Ofsted with all necessary information about committee members so that it is able to check their suitability to work with children 12/12/2017 p.2
- ensure that staff have a good knowledge of all wider safeguarding issues, such as knowledge of the government's 'Prevent' duty guidance 28/11/2017 p.2
- improve staff understanding of how to manage children's behaviour in an appropriate way, so that all children are clear about the type of behaviour that is acceptable. 19/12/2017 p.2
- improve methods used to self-evaluate the provision, including seeking the views of others to help drive forward improvements. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding4
“Safeguarding is not effective.” p.3Communication & language3
“Staff offer children good support to develop their language skills.” p.1Teaching & assessment2
“The manager does not check that risk assessment procedures are thorough.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 923
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Hart Plain Church Pre- School 59 Hart Plain Avenue, Cowplain, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 8RG
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 31 October 2017 15 January 2014
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The manager does not check that risk assessment procedures are thorough. There are hazards in the environment, particularly in the baby room. The provider and the manager have not made sure that all entrances to the provision are secure. It is possible for unauthorised people to gain access to the pre-school. The registered provider has not informed Ofsted of changes to the committee. They have not shared the information Ofsted requires to check applicants are suitable for their role. The manager has not made sure that staff are aware of wider safeguarding issues, such as the 'Prevent' duty. They are unable to identify children at risk of radical views. Not all staff manage challenging behaviour well and children are not always clear about the type of behaviour that is appropriate. The manager does not evaluate all aspects of the provision to raise standards. For example, she does not actively seek the views of others. She has not identified that
p.1
This provision is inadequate
some parents would like to share details of children's learning in a different way.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff offer children good support to develop their language skills. Children are bright and inquisitive, they ask appropriate questions and talk about people that are important to them. Staff allow children time to consider how they want to contribute to discussions. All children are happy in their surroundings, they make good progress in their learning from their initial starting points.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
take all reasonable steps to minimise risks to children in the environment, particularly in relation to the baby room 01/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve security of the provision so that only authorised people are able to gain access to the setting 28/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
provide Ofsted with all necessary information about committee members so that it is able to check their suitability to work with children 12/12/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that staff have a good knowledge of all wider safeguarding issues, such as knowledge of the government's 'Prevent' duty guidance 28/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve staff understanding of how to manage children's behaviour in an appropriate way, so that all children are clear about the type of behaviour that is acceptable. 19/12/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
improve methods used to self-evaluate the provision, including seeking the views of others to help drive forward improvements.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector spoke to parents and carers about their relationship with staff and the information they receive about children's learning. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager. They talked about the adult-led activity they observed and how it could be improved. The inspector held a leadership and management meeting with the manager. They discussed the manager's priorities for improvement. The inspector talked to staff about their experience of safeguarding and the procedures they follow to protect children. The inspector accessed children's records and discussed their progress with staff.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
There are serious weaknesses in the methods the manager uses to reflect on practice. She does not make focused changes or listen to feedback from parents to improve the quality of her provision. Safeguarding is not effective. The manager has neglected to ensure that basic safety standards are maintained. For instance, she does not have good systems in place to check risks are minimised in all areas of the setting. In addition, the manager knows there are security weaknesses at the setting. She has, however, not worked with the registered provider to address these issues and prevent unchecked people entering the premises. In addition, Ofsted has not been given details about committee members to enable it to make the necessary background checks. Staff do have a general knowledge of safeguarding and the procedures to follow to record concerns. However, the manager does not regularly review their knowledge. For example, there are gaps in their
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
understanding of how to recognise children that might be subject to extremist views. Staff feel supported by the manager. She works with them to identify suitable training opportunities, for example, recently a number of staff have completed relevant childcare qualifications. They are being supervised by senior staff members to improve the quality of their teaching.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
Staff encourage children to develop their creative skills. For instance, older children make monsters during a Halloween activity. They enjoy moulding materials to make their chosen shape. Staff skilfully introduce mathematical conversation and children discuss the concepts of opposites, including 'long' and 'short', and 'big' and 'small'. Children take part in a range of well-planned activities that meets their learning needs. Young children take an active interest in stories, such as when children identify their favourite foods in a popular book. Many parents praise the support staff offer to new children, who settle in quickly. Staff form good links with professionals, such as social services, and speech and language therapists. They listen to advice to support children in their development.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Children's safety and well-being are compromised by breaches in the welfare requirements. However, the manager has a secure grasp of appropriate ratios and staff are deployed effectively throughout the setting. Staff do not share behavioural expectations with children. When children test boundaries, staff do not use consistent strategies to support them and children are not always sure how they will respond. Children form secure attachments to staff who offer them affection, such as when they fall over. Children are physically active, such as when they whizz around on bicycles skilfully avoiding obstacles.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
Children display confidence, such as when they share opinions with adults during activities. They acquire a secure range of skills that they will be able to use when they move to school. For example, they draw shapes and practise counting in sequence. Children for whom the setting receives additional funding receive appropriate support and attain well. Children learn some simple scientific concepts, such as when they investigate how insects pollinate plants. They learn the growth cycle and develop an increasing interest in the world around them.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 110111 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 1068386 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 4 Total number of places 50 Number of children on roll 36 Name of registered person Hart Plain Church Pre School Committee
p.5
reference number
Date of previous inspection 15 January 2014 Telephone number 023 92254452
p.5
reference number
Hart Plain Church Pre-School opened in 1968 and registered in 1993. It operates from a church hall in Waterlooville, Hampshire. The provision is run by a church council and a pre-school committee. The pre-school is open every weekday from 8.30am to 4pm, during term time only. The pre-school receives funding for the provision of free early education for two-, three- and four-year-olds. A total of seven staff work directly with the children. The manager holds a level 4 childcare qualification, one member of staff holds a level 6 qualification and five members of staff hold a relevant level 3 qualification.
p.5
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion