Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Oct 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Steve Smith
- Postcode verified
BS4 1NH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is having a positive influence on improving teaching, alongside new resources and teaching programmes, which are helping pupils to make more rapid progress. p.2
- They enable pupils to access their learning, think for themselves and make more rapid progress as a result. p.3
- The trust provides robust and frequent external monitoring, which holds leaders to account effectively. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,026
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Ms George Franks Headteacher Oasis Academy Connaught Melvin Square Knowle West Bristol BS4 1NH
p.1
Connaught
Following my visit to your school on 20 October 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Connaught
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its section 5 inspection before the one that took place in June 2016, the school was also judged to require improvement.
p.1
Connaught
Senior leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.
p.1
Connaught
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Connaught
increase the number of pupils across the school achieving greater depth in writing.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with senior leaders, middle leaders, pupils and a governance representative to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated, alongside the school’s own self-evaluation, middle leaders’ action plans and the school’s monitoring of teaching records. Attendance and safeguarding documents were also scrutinised. In addition, a learning walk was undertaken by the lead inspector and the headteacher to observe pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection there have been seven new teaching appointments, including two senior leaders. Three of these appointments are newly qualified teachers. Historically, recruitment and retention have been a challenge for the school.
p.2
Main findings
Led by the headteacher, senior leaders have been proactive and determined in their efforts to tackle the areas for improvement raised at the last inspection. The newly appointed deputy and assistant headteachers have brought with them a wide range of skills which complement those of the headteacher. Consequently, leaders are driving forward sustainable improvements with energy, commitment and integrity. Their actions are having a positive impact on improving the quality of teaching and raising standards.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders know the school well. They have a detailed, objective and comprehensive view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. The areas for improvement from the last inspection underpin leaders’ strategic planning. These plans are reviewed frequently in order to gauge pupils’ progress.
p.2
Main findings
Leadership capacity is also strengthening because middle leaders are now taking greater ownership of their work. They are working more closely with senior leaders and planning for improvement in a more strategic way. Middle leaders report that their contributions are valued by senior leaders and they feel trusted to exercise their responsibilities. Senior leaders support and challenge middle leaders in equal measure to ensure that they continue to develop in their roles.
p.2
Main findings
Improvements to leadership are improving the quality of teaching and learning in turn. Leaders are meeting the training needs of staff by providing tailored professional development. Rigorous quality assurance systems are in place to manage the performance of staff and ensure consistency of practice. These systems are proving essential for maintaining the quality of teaching when new staff join the school. Recently appointed staff have provided an injection of expertise and enthusiasm which complements the valued experience of existing staff. This is having a positive influence on improving teaching, alongside new resources and teaching programmes, which are helping pupils to make more rapid progress.
p.2
Main findings
Staff now have higher expectations of pupils who are being set more challenging work as a result. Teachers are planning activities that better meet the needs of different groups of pupils. As a result, pupils are engaged in their learning because they are interested in the activities and want to participate. One pupil who spoke with the lead inspector said, ‘They [teachers] make lessons more interesting.’
p.2
Main findings
The most able pupils are challenged to think more deeply. For example, in one observed Year 6 lesson, pupils of different abilities were provided with different questions to help them write biographies of Rosa Parks. The most able pupils were required to consider more sophisticated questions such as, ‘What does it [the text] mean by a quiet exemplification of courage, dignity and determination?’
p.3
Main findings
Lower-ability pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are well supported by teaching assistants. They enable pupils to access their learning, think for themselves and make more rapid progress as a result. Pupils who spoke with the lead inspector reported that they are helped in different ways if they struggle with their learning. They understand that struggling is not something to be embarrassed about because it is an essential part of learning.
p.3
Main findings
The improving quality of teaching is raising pupils’ achievement by the time they leave the school. This was evident in pupils’ outcomes in 2017. In reading and mathematics, pupils made progress that was in line with the top 10% of schools nationally. Nevertheless, leaders acknowledge that more pupils across the school need to achieve greater depth in their writing.
p.3
Main findings
Attendance has improved since the time of the last inspection. For the current academic year, it is above average. This is because leaders are monitoring attendance on a weekly basis and using a range of strategies, including close working with parents, to improve it. Exclusions are also falling because leaders are providing more internal solutions, such as the nurture room. Innovations such as these are helping to manage pupils’ behaviour and keep them in the school.
p.3
External support
The school benefits from the support of the Oasis multi-academy trust. The trust provides robust and frequent external monitoring, which holds leaders to account effectively. These processes complement the school’s own quality assurance processes. Leaders also value the expertise and training provided by staff in other trust academies. This has helped to improve aspects of leadership and teaching.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the executive board, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bristol. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion