Summary
Eve Morris (lead), Joan Hewitt (lead), Mary Lanovy-Taylor
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Oct 2017
- Inspectors verified
Eve Morris, Joan Hewitt, Mary Lanovy-Taylor
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LS14 5BY
- Name on report verified
Grimes Dyke Primary School
- URN verified
107924
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The work to secure the trust and support of families is exemplary. p.1
- This approach is highly effective in overcoming obstacles to pupils’ learning and gaining the support of parents. p.5
- Staff have had effective training and they are confident in discussing difficult topics so that pupils feel able discuss their ideas and thoughts in a safe environment. p.4
- Pupils have strong and warm relationships with all the adults in the school and with each other. p.5
- Vulnerable pupils are very well cared for because all the adults know them well and know how to support them to overcome significant difficulties. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They were aware of changes to the curriculum in key stage 2, but their level of challenge and support to school leaders was ineffective in preventing poor outcomes for pupils in 2017. p.4
- They failed to challenge effectively when pupils’ outcomes were not as strong as they should have been in 2016. p.4
- Consequently, pupils are not making consistently good progress. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of leadership and management by: – ensuring that leaders’ evaluations of teaching and pupils’ learning are accurate and used to secure improvements in pupils’ attainment and progress – ensuring that the curriculum prepares pupils well for the rigours of key stage 2 p.2
- Improve the quality of the provision in the early years by: – making more resources available to support children in their reading, writing and number skills – improving the assessment of children’s progress and use it to plan activities which match their needs more precisely. p.2
- An external review of the school’s governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- Leaders have not tackled all the areas for improvement since the previous inspection. p.3
- There remains a lack of challenge for the most able pupils, and weaknesses in pupils’ writing and mathematical skills. p.3
- Boys’ progress and engagement in the early years continue to be a concern. p.3
- Pupils’ outcomes at the end of key stages 1 and 2 fell short of leaders and governors’ aspirations. p.3
- The school had a difficult time last year. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families11
“The work to secure the trust and support of families is exemplary.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,220
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Grimes Dyke Primary School Stanks Drive, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS14 5BY
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders, including governors, have not had high enough expectations of pupils and staff in recent years. Consequently, pupils are not making consistently good progress. Leaders’ evaluations of the quality of teaching, learning and assessment are not accurate. Leaders perceive the quality of teaching and pupils’ behaviour to be better than it is. Leaders have not prepared pupils well for the increased demands of the curriculum in key stage 2. Systems to check how well different groups of pupils are doing have not been effective. Recent changes have not been in place long enough for teachers to use the information effectively to plan work at the right level for pupils of differing abilities. The gap between pupils’ attainment and that of their peers nationally has widened. Few of the most able pupils at the school reach higher standards in reading, writing or mathematics at the end of key stages 1 and 2.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do are not high enough to secure good progress. Teachers’ questioning skills are insufficiently probing or demanding. Pupils are too reliant on teachers to provide the answer when they are tackling tasks they find difficult. They become restless too quickly. Adults do not take full advantage of opportunities to extend children’s thinking and language in the early years. There are not enough opportunities for children to explore numbers and develop their writing skills.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The work to secure the trust and support of families is exemplary. Parents speak highly of the tailored support the school has provided. Vulnerable pupils are very well cared for because all the adults know them well and know how to support them to overcome significant difficulties. Leaders have been successful in improving the attendance of all pupils. The school is highly inclusive: exclusions are rare and pupils are safe. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, including those with speech, language and communication difficulties, often make better progress than their peers.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, especially in reading, writing and mathematics, by: – raising teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do, especially for boys in writing, including in the early years – ensuring that teachers include those pupils who do not offer an answer in discussions, and pitch questions appropriately to pupils’ abilities – ensuring that pupils develop resilience in tackling difficult tasks, especially for the most able pupils, so that pupils are fully engaged in learning and reduce the amount of time they become distracted – ensuring that reading activities help the low-attaining pupils read with understanding. Improve the quality of leadership and management by: – ensuring that leaders’ evaluations of teaching and pupils’ learning are accurate and used to secure improvements in pupils’ attainment and progress – ensuring that the curriculum prepares pupils well for the rigours of key stage 2
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
across all subjects – ensuring that leaders use assessment information to monitor and evaluate how well different groups of pupils are doing and support teachers to use that information to improve the quality of teaching and learning – developing effective strategies to reduce the number of behaviour incidents which disrupt pupils’ learning. Improve the quality of the provision in the early years by: – making more resources available to support children in their reading, writing and number skills – improving the assessment of children’s progress and use it to plan activities which match their needs more precisely. An external review of the school’s governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders have not tackled all the areas for improvement since the previous inspection. There remains a lack of challenge for the most able pupils, and weaknesses in pupils’ writing and mathematical skills. Boys’ progress and engagement in the early years continue to be a concern. Pupils’ outcomes at the end of key stages 1 and 2 fell short of leaders and governors’ aspirations. The school had a difficult time last year. Some weak teaching, staff absence and some knotty staffing issues all contributed to creating a decline in the quality of teaching. Leaders have not been sufficiently ambitious in responding to the demands of the recent changes to the key stage 2 curriculum. Consequently, pupils were ill prepared for the next stage in their education. The headteacher and senior and middle leaders undertake regular monitoring of the quality of teaching, but their evaluations have been over optimistic. Where there have
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
been clear indications of underperformance, leaders have put in place effective support plans for individual teachers and this is beginning to bear fruit. Leaders and governors have undertaken a candid review of the causes of the poor results at key stage 2 in 2017 and they have taken urgent action to secure improvements in pupils’ reading and writing skills. Their actions are showing early signs of success and work in pupils’ books has improved. The school’s work to improve the teaching of phonics resulted in a sharp rise in the proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard in 2017. Nevertheless, leaders know that there is no room for complacency in ensuring that improvements are maintained. Pupils benefit from a number of trips and visitors, which extend their knowledge of other cultures and religions. Leaders ensure that pupils are prepared well for life in modern Britain. Leaders’ determination to provide a breadth of experience occasionally
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
meets with resistance from some parents. For example, some parents did not want their child to experience a visit to a local mosque. Leaders were tenacious in persuading parents about the benefits of such a visit. The school’s use of the pupil premium funding has had some success, and disadvantaged pupils’ attendance is now in line with the national average. Leaders’ analysis of the barriers facing disadvantaged pupils is accurate and thorough. For example, leaders identified that many disadvantaged pupils had speech and communication difficulties. Leaders successfully used the expertise from the school’s specially resourced unit, and there are clear signs of pupils gaining confidence and skills as a result of this support. Leaders have ensured that the additional funding for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is used effectively. There is a strong team whose members ensure that pupils who have additional needs are identified, and individual
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
reviews of how well pupils are doing are carried out in a timely fashion. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities frequently have significant needs, predominantly with emotional, behavioural and social difficulties, and with speech, language and communication difficulties. Staff have regular training to equip them with the skills to support these pupils. Generally, this is done well, but occasionally teaching assistants do not always deal with disruptive behaviour effectively, and consequently, other pupils’ learning is disrupted. The quality of the support from the local authority has been variable. Officers were slow to take decisive action when they first had concerns about the school.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors are candid in admitting that they have ‘taken their eye off the ball’. They failed to challenge effectively when pupils’ outcomes were not as strong as they should have been in 2016. They were aware of changes to the curriculum in key stage 2, but their level of challenge and support to school leaders was ineffective in preventing poor outcomes for pupils in 2017. Governors have now started to re-evaluate their own skills and expertise. Governors accurately identify the priorities for the school. They are passionate in supporting the school in maintaining excellent relationships with families and the community. They recently visited the school for a day to explore how they can offer better challenge and support. However, it is too soon to see any demonstrable impact. Governors understand how the pupil premium funding has been spent, but they do not fully appreciate the range and success of the activities it supports. They have had more
p.4
Governance of the school
success in ensuring that the physical education and sport premium is used effectively. Governors have checked that the work of the sports coach has been successful in engaging more pupils in taking up out-of-school activities. As a result, more pupils are enjoying the benefits of regular exercise and of belonging to a club or team.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. There is a strong safeguarding culture in the school. The safety of pupils, especially the significant number who are in vulnerable circumstances, is at the heart of the school’s work. Staff are vigilant in spotting when pupils are experiencing difficulties. Liaison with external agencies is frequent and effective. Records include a clear chronology of incidents and actions, enabling staff to spot any escalations in the number or types of concerns. Consequently, pupils and their families are confident that any concerns are dealt with effectively. Leaders have ensured that the risk posed by extremism is assessed appropriately. The school is highly successful in creating an environment in which pupils feel comfortable and safe. Staff have had effective training and they are confident in discussing difficult topics so that pupils feel able discuss their ideas and thoughts in a safe environment.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do have led to dips in pupils’ progress and a weak set of results for Year 6 and at the end of key stage 1 in 2017. A consequence of these low expectations is that pupils have not attained high enough standards in reading, writing and mathematics. The quality of teaching is improving but not enough to eradicate inconsistencies. Teachers do not consistently use assessment information effectively to build on the skills, knowledge and understanding pupils already have. Teachers use questions to test out pupils’ understanding, but too readily give pupils the answers. This holds back their progress, especially that of the most able pupils. Some pupils offer answers to teachers’ questions frequently but many do not, choosing not to put up their hands. There are occasions when teachers match the difficulty of the question to the ability of the pupil, but this does not happen consistently.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teachers work harder than their pupils. Pupils give up too easily when they find the work challenging. They do not seek to find out solutions to problems for themselves. Instead, they rely too much on teachers and teaching assistants to encourage and support them. Consequently, pupils are not resilient when they are sitting tests and do not develop independence. Teachers have had recent success in improving pupils’ stamina in writing at length. Throughout the school, boys’ writing continues to be weaker than that of girls. Pupils’ writing is not of the same quality in subjects such as science or topic work as it is in English. The teaching of phonics has improved and this has resulted in a sharp rise in the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check last year. Leaders are aware that there are occasionally inconsistencies in how well sounds are modelled by adults. Nevertheless, pupils use their skills effectively to
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
sound out words and are gaining increasing confidence and enjoyment in their reading. Less able readers are keen to have a go with unfamiliar texts, but not with full understanding. Teachers are becoming more skilled in ensuring that pupils have opportunities to explain their thinking in mathematics and undertake investigations to explore problems. Teachers regularly offer pupils an extra challenge when they have completed their main task. However, pupils often select the level of challenge they will undertake and this sometimes leads to the most able pupils not being challenged sufficiently. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well. Teachers know their needs, and teaching assistants generally offer a strong level of support so that pupils make progress and develop pride in their achievements.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils have strong and warm relationships with all the adults in the school and with each other. A significant proportion of pupils experience turmoil in their life outside school and staff work effectively with them to develop their confidence. Pupils are courteous and they are confident in talking with adults. The school has created trusting relationships with parents, who speak highly of staff. School staff go above and beyond expectations to support families through difficult times. This approach is highly effective in overcoming obstacles to pupils’ learning and gaining the support of parents. Teachers and other adults ensure that pupils have good-quality opportunities to debate tricky subjects as part of the school’s personal, social and health education programme and through informal support. The school’s effective nurture unit is highly valued by
p.5
Personal development and welfare
parents and pupils. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe, including staying safe online. They have faith in staff to take action on their behalf should they need it, in the knowledge that support will be swift, effective and sensitive. Pupils who have speech, language and communication difficulties develop confidence and skills. They play a full and active part in all school activities. Pupils’ confidence in tackling difficult work is less well developed because they do not have enough opportunities to tackle demanding tasks.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. The school is generally a calm and orderly environment. A significant number of pupils, mainly boys, have identified behaviour difficulties. They are generally supported well in managing their challenging behaviour. However, the school’s records show that there is a high number of incidents that interfere with learning. Pupils also report that they have had to leave their classrooms on occasions so that adults can deal with an incident. Pupils are generally amenable and show respect towards each other and to adults. However, in lessons, they are typically restless, and fidget when they are not engaged by the teaching. Pupils understand how all forms of bullying can be upsetting and they know that they can approach any adult for help should they need it and get a swift response. Pupils are generally kind to each other and help each other out. Some pupils in key stages 1
p.6
Behaviour
and 2 who spoke with inspectors said that occasionally pupils call each other names and fall out. This tends to be about appearance or teasing about families. On the playground, pupils play well together. Games are lively and pupils are quick to invite others to join in. Older pupils, in their high-visibility jackets and caps, act as ‘play buddies’ to support the setting up of games and help with any minor fallings-out between friends. Plenty of adults are close at hand to support. The school has had success in ensuring that pupils attend well and pupils’ attendance is average. In keeping with the school’s ethos, exclusions are rare and the school works extremely hard and generally successfully to keep pupils with identified behaviour difficulties in school and accessing learning.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Results at the end of key stage 2 in 2017 show that a much lower than average proportion of pupils reached the expected standard. Pupils’ attainment in combined mathematics, reading and writing was well below average standards and has declined since 2016. Overall, pupils’ progress in reading was not good enough. Progress in mathematics and writing was particularly weak, especially for boys in writing. Disadvantaged pupils made similarly weak progress. Fewer pupils reached the expected standards at the end of Year 2 in reading, writing and mathematics in 2017 compared with the previous year. The proportions of pupils achieving a higher level of understanding were disappointing in reading and writing and especially poor in mathematics. Work in pupils’ books since July shows that pupils’ skills in writing and mathematics are improving. Pupils in key stage 2 are beginning to make up the ground they lost last
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
year. Pupils are developing more stamina in their writing and enjoying more interesting problem-solving work in mathematics. Boys’ skills in writing are not improving as quickly as those of girls. The current progress of disadvantaged pupils, who account for the majority of pupils, is keeping pace with the smaller proportion of other pupils in reading, writing and mathematics. The most able pupils across the school are not making rapid enough progress because teachers do not expect enough from them. Their ability to wrestle with difficult problems or investigations is limited. Leaders and teachers have concentrated on improving pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics, with some early signs of success. However, the progress pupils make in other subjects, such as science and topic work, is weaker. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are currently keeping pace with other pupils. Sometimes they make better progress because the support they
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
have from teachers and other adults is tightly focused on specific skills and knowledge. Pupils who have speech, language and communication difficulties are also supported well, and generally make good progress.
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
The majority of children enter the Nursery class with skills, knowledge and abilities which are below those typical for their age. Children’s personal, social and emotional development and the development of their speech and language skills are generally the weaker elements. Additional funding has been used to support children with extra help from a speech and language specialist in the Nursery and Reception classes. This has had some success, but it has been more limited for boys, because adults do not engage them effectively in reading and writing activities. Instead, boys generally choose to do more physical tasks, such as riding bikes or throwing and catching balls, and adults do not successfully use these activities to stimulate boys’ interest in writing and reading. The resources for stimulating children’s interest in reading, writing and mathematics are underdeveloped. There are not enough exciting writing and number activities for
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
children to use independently. The proportion of children who reached a good level of development by the end of the Reception Year was below the national average in 2017 and has not kept pace with improvements nationally. This is due in part to the variation from year to year in the skills and knowledge with which children enter the school, with not all children coming through from Nursery. Nevertheless, the extent to which children are prepared for the move into Year 1 is inconsistent. Leaders’ assessments of children’s progress have not been sufficiently precise. For example, photographs of children’s activities are not accompanied by an evaluation of their gains in skills, knowledge or understanding. Leaders are developing a more effective strategy for assessing children’s progress, but this is a recent development and it is too soon to evaluate it fully. Children gain confidence in the early years, often from low starting points. They are
p.8
Early years provision Requires improvement
kind to each other and develop increasingly confident social skills. The early years is a safe and nurturing environment in which children develop positive relationships with adults and with each other. The work to ensure that children are safe and well cared for is very strong. Children enjoy most success in developing their reading, writing and number skills when they are involved in adult-directed activities. For example, children working with the teacher persevered in forming letters correctly, and commented to each other about how well they were doing and how hard they were trying.
p.8
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Email address louise.hill@grimesdyke.leeds.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 13–14 December 2012
p.9
Information about this school
The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school is an average-sized primary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils who are eligible for support from the pupil premium is much higher than the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is much higher than the national average. The school has a specially resourced provision for pupils who have speech, language and communication difficulties. There are currently five pupils accessing this provision through support in class. In 2016, the school met the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6.
p.9
Information about this inspection
The inspection was carried out over three days. The inspectors observed learning across the school and made short visits to classrooms. The headteacher and deputy headteacher accompanied the lead inspectors on a number of occasions. The inspectors listened to pupils read and reviewed the work in pupils’ books. Pupils’ behaviour in lessons and during break was observed. The inspector talked informally with pupils in lessons and around the school and held formal meetings with pupils across key stage 2. The inspectors held discussions with the headteacher and senior leaders. In addition to this, the inspectors met with members of the governing body, subject leader/ coordinators and staff responsible for safeguarding, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors also met a representative from the local authority on two occasions. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation, including leaders’ evaluation of the
p.11
Information about this inspection
school’s performance and school improvement planning. They also looked at minutes of governing body meetings and documentation relating to safeguarding, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors took into account the views of parents during the inspection, as well as 57 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View. One inspector met with two parents. Inspectors took into account the views of the staff throughout the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
Joan Hewitt, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Eve Morris, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion