Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Buckinghamshire New University

Inspected — · published 15 Nov 2017 · URN 133823

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Richard Pemble

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HP11 2JZ

  • Name on report verified

    Buckinghamshire New University

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 42% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyhighly skilledvery wellpromptlyhigh-qualitysafevery highsuccessful
Criticismtoo fewyet toslownot well prepared

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings771w+59
  • What needs to improve144w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
905
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Dr Sri-Kartini Leet Head of Department: Art and Design Buckinghamshire New University Queen Alexandra Road High Wycombe Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ

p.1

Short inspection of Buckinghamshire New University

Following the short inspection on 17 and 18 October 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The inspection was the first short inspection carried out since the provider was judged to be good in October 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Buckinghamshire New University

Staff have continued to make sure that a high proportion of students achieve their level 3 diploma in art and design and that those who are capable achieve merit and distinction grades.

p.1

Short inspection of Buckinghamshire New University

Students continue to make good use of high-quality and varied resources in the workshops and studios to develop their practical skills and their knowledge and understanding of art and design. Teachers are highly skilled in their various artistic disciplines and work together to support students’ learning very well.

p.1

Short inspection of Buckinghamshire New University

Staff have worked effectively to introduce new and emerging media into the course. For example, students use digital media competently to design websites and animations; this prepares them well for their next steps in education or employment.

p.1

Short inspection of Buckinghamshire New University

There have been no safeguarding incidents at the university affecting level 3 students. The very few safeguarding incidents at the university in recent years have affected students on undergraduate or postgraduate courses. Staff investigated these thoroughly and the students affected received appropriate support from specialist staff. Senior leaders and managers have established a culture and ethos of tolerance and respect throughout the university. Students reflect this in their conduct and behaviours. Staff carry out their roles in respect of safeguarding well. They give students’ welfare a high priority. Staff use university welfare, student finance and housing services promptly to refer students who need extra help or guidance. However, the designated safeguarding officer has not completed any update training recently.

p.1

Short inspection of Buckinghamshire New University

Staff have yet to provide sufficient training for students in how to keep themselves safe from the dangers of extremism and radicalisation. Students have a basic understanding of these topics, but much of this has come from previous learning and not from staff at the university. Posters and other displays around the campus remind students how to keep themselves safe. Staff have a good understanding of the indicators about which they should keep vigilant.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The proportion of students who achieved their level 3 diploma in art and design in 2016/17 remained high. A high proportion of students were successful in achieving their qualification at merit or distinction level. All students who applied for degree courses at university received offers and took these up. Staff do not have sufficient knowledge of the destinations of those students who did not choose to go to university at the end of their diploma course.  Current students are producing a broad and imaginative range of work for the course. They are learning to use a wide range of media and materials creatively in well-equipped and resourced workshops and studios. Teachers develop students’ knowledge and understanding further through a series of lectures from staff who teach on undergraduate courses. This raises students’ aspirations to higher-level study very effectively and prepares them well for degree-level work,

p.2

Inspection findings

for example by improving their essay writing and research skills.  Teachers do not give students enough feedback in the early stages of the course to help them improve the quality of their work or their skills. As a result, too few students know how well they are doing on their course and they do not feel well prepared for their first assessment. Teachers do not give students sufficient support and guidance in the early stages of the course to help them evaluate and critically reflect on work in sketchbooks enough; many of their notes are descriptive. By the final term, following teachers’ feedback after their subsequent assessments, most students have developed these skills well.  Staff are highly responsive to students’ feedback about how the course could be improved. They make changes promptly, where this is feasible. However, university systems to monitor the quality of the provision and bring about

p.2

Inspection findings

improvements are underdeveloped and slow. The recently appointed head of department has put in place new systems to review and improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.  Teachers give students very high quality advice and guidance to choose their pathways and specialisms for the diploma course, and for university choices. Staff set well-considered projects and assessments that challenge students’ preconceptions very effectively. Teachers structure project briefs clearly, which encourages students helps them to think and work independently in studios and workshops.

p.2

Next steps for the provider

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the provider

 quality-improvement actions are identified swiftly, improvements are made promptly and managers monitor progress towards these actions frequently  students receive feedback from teachers on their progress and achievements earlier in the course, so that they know how well they are performing and what they need to improve in good time for their first assessments  staff collect and analyse information on students’ destinations to inform improvements to the course  teachers improve students’ understanding of how to keep themselves safe from the dangers of extremism and radicalisation and their knowledge of how British values apply to their lives and career aspirations  the designated safeguarding officer completes update training for their role promptly.

p.3

Next steps for the provider

I am copying this letter to the Education and Skills Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and one Ofsted Inspector. The head of department for art and design, as nominee, assisted us. We visited workshops, studios and classrooms to observe teaching, learning and assessments and to look at students’ work. We met with students, senior leaders, managers and teachers. We reviewed key documents including the university’s most recent self-evaluation report and documents related to safeguarding. We also analysed data on the performance of students currently on the course and considered the views of students, staff and managers.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion