Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Bagshot Community Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Bagshot Community Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP524359
- Inspection date verified
18 Oct 2017
- Inspectors verified
Helen Robinshaw
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
GU19 5BP
- Name on report verified
Bagshot Community Pre- School
- URN verified
EY306962
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff do not plan well enough as a team to meet every child's individual needs and next steps in learning. p.1
- Children of different ages and abilities are not consistently sufficiently challenged to make good progress in their learning. p.1
- Leaders have not established fully effective systems to monitor, support and coach staff. p.1
- For example, staff do not consistently use opportunities to enhance children's communication and language skills, or promote early literacy and mathematics consistently to challenge some older children. p.1
- On occasion, staff do not use opportunities that arise to promote children's self-care and independence skills. p.1
- Some children lack confidence in acting independently. p.1
- The new manager has not had time to address all areas for improvement to ensure that all requirements are met. p.1
- The manager is effective in identifying priorities for improvement in safeguarding and inclusion. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics4
“For example, they enjoy looking at books.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 777
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Bagshot Community Pre- School Willow Room, Bagshot School, School Lane, Bagshot, Surrey, GU19 5BP
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 18 October 2017 17 July 2013
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
Staff do not plan well enough as a team to meet every child's individual needs and next steps in learning. Children of different ages and abilities are not consistently sufficiently challenged to make good progress in their learning. Leaders have not established fully effective systems to monitor, support and coach staff. The quality of teaching is variable. For example, staff do not consistently use opportunities to enhance children's communication and language skills, or promote early literacy and mathematics consistently to challenge some older children. On occasion, staff do not use opportunities that arise to promote children's self-care and independence skills. Some children lack confidence in acting independently. The new manager has not had time to address all areas for improvement to ensure that all requirements are met.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The manager is effective in identifying priorities for improvement in safeguarding and inclusion. For example, she is proactive and quick to secure further support for children's welfare and special educational needs where it is necessary. Staff build strong partnerships with parents and other professionals. Recent training in the role and responsibilities of the key person has improved staff effectiveness in providing consistent care for children. Staff provide regular opportunities for outdoor play, which supports children's physical well-being effectively.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
plan effectively for children's next steps in learning to help all children make good progress 30/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
provide effective monitoring, support, coaching and training for all staff to ensure the quality of staff practice and teaching is consistently good. 30/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
make better use of everyday opportunities to further support children's growing independence develop self-evaluation to make it more robust and ensure that clearly identified plans for improvement result in all requirements being met.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed, listened to and talked with children as they played inside and outside. The inspector talked with parents and listened to their views about the pre-school and their children's progress. The inspector observed teaching and care routines and spoke with staff about their aspirations and plans for promoting children's learning. The inspector sampled records and procedures relating to safeguarding and risk assessment, and discussed a range of other procedures relating to children's welfare with the manager. The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager and met the outgoing and incoming chairpersons for the committee. They discussed recent changes in staffing and areas currently under improvement.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The committee-run pre-school is emerging stronger following a time of change. However, plans to raise standards further are still in the early stages. For example, leaders do not monitor, support and coach staff to ensure the quality of teaching is consistently good. The new manager is highly qualified and capable. Parents state that they are already noticing improvements in communication that provide continuity in their children's learning and care. Leaders continue to improve a broad range of policies and procedures to help the manager keep children safe. For instance, the manager reviews any accidents or injuries that occur and ensures staff minimise any risks in the environment. Safeguarding is effective. The manager checks staff understand how to recognise and respond appropriately to any concerns about children's welfare. She assesses the staff's ongoing suitability to work with children.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Key staff identify the next steps in children's learning. However, they do not share them effectively across the team, or use them consistently to plan, evaluate or improve how well they help children progress. Nonetheless, staff quickly identify children who need more help. Staff are adapting well to some changes in planning and assessment. For instance, they create varied and interesting play areas. Staff have improved the accuracy and effectiveness of the assessments they make when children join the pre-school at two years of age. Children quickly engage in and explore activities of their choosing. For example, they set up ramps to push cars down and enjoy imaginative play.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Sometimes, activities are not targeted to meet children's needs to develop their confidence and engagement. On occasion, staff do not promote children's growing independence well. For example, they miss opportunities to encourage children to do things for themselves, such as pouring drinks and putting on coats for outside play. Staff are warm and caring. They quickly offer emotional security as children learn to manage their feelings in new situations. Younger children settle in quickly and there is a very happy atmosphere. Staff have clear expectations for children's behaviour and children rise to them. For example, older children wait patiently for their turn as they queue for the slide and take turns well when sharing their views.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Not all children make good enough progress in their learning due to inconsistencies in teaching. Some younger children, and those learning English as an additional language, do not make good enough progress in their speaking. Some older children make slower progress in literacy and mathematics. However, children generally show an interest in literacy. For example, they enjoy looking at books. Children develop an awareness of the world around them. They acquire some skills in readiness for school, such as an enthusiasm for learning and a respect for each other.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY306962 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 1061911 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 21 Number of children on roll 39 Name of registered person Bagshot Community Pre-School Committee
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 17 July 2013 Telephone number 01276 452623
p.4
reference number
Bagshot Community Pre-School registered in 2001. It operates from the same site as Bagshot Infant School, in Bagshot, Surrey. It is open each weekday, during term time, from 9am to midday and from 12.30pm to 3pm on Mondays and Wednesdays. The pre- school is in receipt of funding for the provision of free early education to children aged two, three and four years. There are six members of staff working with the children regularly, all of whom hold appropriate qualifications at level 2 to level 6. The manager holds an honours degree in early years education. The pre-school also employs three bank staff and two administrators.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion