Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Oct 2017
- Inspectors verified
Jenny Carpenter
- Postcode verified
CO6 3QL
- Name on report verified
Doucecroft School
- URN verified
115426
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- While the sanctions are in line with the new policy, the school is not always rigorous in monitoring their effectiveness. p.2
- In the case of serious misbehaviour by pupils, the school now records sanctions it has used. p.2
- These standards were not met at the inspection in February 2017 because: – the school’s policies and procedures did not specifically reference what happens and what was expected in the boarding provision and, as a result, the residential service p.2
- Full details of the NMS currently not met are contained in p.3
- Standards that were not met at the previous inspection and remain unmet at this inspection p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. p.3
- This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. p.3
- Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,389
- shorter than usual (typical 1813)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 49
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
School progress monitoring inspection report
p.1
Abbotts Lane, Eight Ash Green, Colchester, Essex CO6 3QL
p.1
Main inspection findings
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraphs 9, 9(a), 9(b) and 9(c) At the standard inspection in February 2017, the arrangements to promote good behaviour among pupils were not met because: – although records of all incidents are filed, they were not all completed fully and there is a lack of oversight and monitoring of the records – the guidance to staff in the behaviour policy was inaccurate; the behaviour policy lists only two possible sanctions and the incident book for recording unacceptable behaviour contained additional sanctions that are not referenced in the behaviour policy. In the school’s action plan, the proprietor undertook to: – update the behaviour policy to reflect the requirements of the independent school standards and the national minimum standards – create and implement a new tracking system for monitoring sanctions and incidents – share findings from monitoring with staff, record actions required and implement the
p.1
Main inspection findings
changes needed. Following the inspection in February 2017, school leaders reviewed the school’s behaviour policy in consultation with staff. The new policy is based on the context of Doucecroft School and emphasises a positive approach to behaviour management. The behaviour policy includes a comprehensive anti-bullying policy. This policy gives staff and parents helpful information about autistic spectrum disorder and bullying, as well as strategies for preventing bullying, including cyber bullying. The school has adopted a new tracking system for monitoring sanctions and incidents. At the time of this inspection, this system was at an early stage of introduction. As a result, leaders are not yet confident that it allows them to monitor and analyse sanctions and incidents. The new behaviour policy has been approved by governors, and staff have received training. The current monitoring of behaviour has helped school leaders to identify that
p.1
Main inspection findings
the new policy is not consistently applied. Additional training for staff is planned. In the case of serious misbehaviour by pupils, the school now records sanctions it has used. While the sanctions are in line with the new policy, the school is not always rigorous in monitoring their effectiveness. Governors receive regular reports about the use of restrictive physical interventions but it is not clear how they check that staff are debriefed following the interventions. Leaders have not ensured that this independent school standard is met. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b) and 34(1)(c); Part 3 Paragraphs 8, 8(a) and 8(b) These standards were not met at the inspection in February 2017 because: – the school’s policies and procedures did not specifically reference what happens and what was expected in the boarding provision and, as a result, the residential service
p.2
Main inspection findings
did not have a clear and positive profile promoted within the school – the leaders and managers across the school were not fully effective in working together to identify and tackle weaknesses – the senior management team did not consistently challenge practice or drive improvement in the boarding service – school leaders, governors and trustees did not demonstrate the skills needed to fulfil their duties to ensure that the independent school standards and minimum standards for residential special schools are met – leaders and governors did not review the school’s policies and procedures frequently enough to establish how well they are implemented or how well they promote good practice and meet current guidance – governors did not hold leaders to account for the progress that different groups of pupils are making across the full range of subjects – governors oversee the arrangements for appraisal effectively but not all had an
p.2
Main inspection findings
accurate view of the school’s priorities for development. In the school’s action plan, the proprietor undertook to: – use the National Governor Association’s principles to identify experience and training needs of governors and trustees – establish monitoring procedures and meeting cycles that are used to evaluate the school’s performance, with protocols and records to guide their monitoring and evaluations – identify staff who will develop and report on policies to the senior leadership team – amend safeguarding practices through policies and flow charts, and undertake monthly safeguarding meetings to check that the arrangements are adhered to – require the senior leadership team to undertake progress reviews in school and the residential provision to evaluate policies and procedures, and staff’s understanding of them, and to present the findings to the governing body – require governors to meet with staff to review pupils’ progress from baseline
p.2
Main inspection findings
assessments and in relation to targets for groups of pupils – track pupils’ progress and achievements termly and report the findings to governors termly – make sure that all policies reference the residential provision. Following the inspection in February 2017, school leaders developed detailed action plans so that staff at the school and the boarding provision remain focused on key priorities. School leaders understand their responsibilities. They work as a team, support one another and ensure that less experienced leaders are mentored so that they can work effectively. School leaders have reviewed school policies to ensure a consistent approach across both the education and boarding settings at the school. School leaders have strengthened safeguarding practice. The school now has six designated safeguarding leads (DSLs) across the school and boarding houses. They use the same protocols and procedures throughout and information about referrals is
p.3
Main inspection findings
accessible to DSLs in both settings. This means that important information is shared quickly if required. Leaders who are responsible for safeguarding maintain a log of referrals. Leaders from the school and the boarding accommodation meet each month to review safeguarding. However, records of the meetings do not demonstrate how the school maintains an overview of ongoing safeguarding concerns, particularly for the most vulnerable pupils. There is a suitable safeguarding policy on the school’s website. Governors have audited their skills and experience, with guidance from a national leader of governance. This is informing their search for additional governors. School leaders and governors do not carefully monitor whether the school meets all the required national minimum standards (NMS) for residential special schools and the independent school standards. Full details of the NMS currently not met are contained in
p.3
Main inspection findings
a separate social care inspection report. Governors now have a plan of monitoring activities for each half term. This helps them to focus on the strategic priorities of the school. Governors make routine checks of specific aspects of safeguarding, such as the single central register. Senior leaders, including boarding staff, report to governors about their areas of responsibility. Governors’ understanding of how to interpret this information, and their effective challenge of school leaders, are developing, and they are starting to understand better the school’s work. For example, two governors visited the school to find out more about the progress that pupils are expected to make. This work is at an early stage and it is not clear what happens as a result of their visits. Leaders have not ensured that this independent school standard is met.
p.3
Compliance with regulatory requirements
The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.
p.3
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
Standards that were not met at the previous inspection and remain unmet at this inspection The proprietor must ensure that: – arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of boarders while they are accommodated at the school; and – such arrangements have regard to the National Minimum Standards for Boarding Schools or, where applicable, the National Minimum Standards for Residential Special Schools or the National Minimum Standards for Accommodation of Students under Eighteen by Further Education Colleges (paragraphs 8, 8(a) and 8(b)). The proprietor must promote good behaviour amongst pupils by ensuring that the behaviour policy is implemented effectively (paragraphs 9 and 9(b)). The proprietor must ensure that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school: – demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and
p.4
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
– fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently – actively promote the well-being of pupils (paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b) and 34(1)(c)).
p.4
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.5
School details
Type of school Other independent special school
p.5
School details
School status Independent residential special school
p.5
School details
Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed
p.5
School details
Of which, number on roll in sixth form 13
p.5
School details
Annual fees (day pupils) £89,821 to £184,148
p.5
School details
Website www.autism-anglia.org.uk/doucecroft-school
p.5
School details
Email address jsmart@autism-anglia.org.uk
p.5
School details
Date of previous standard inspection 7–9 February 2017
p.5
Information about this school
Doucecroft is a day and residential special school for boys and girls, aged from three to 19 years, who have autistic spectrum disorder. Many pupils have moderate or severe learning difficulties, attention deficit disorder or hyperactivity disorder. All pupils have an education, health and care plan or a statement of special educational needs, and are funded by their local authorities. There have been no children of Nursery or Reception age and no pupils at key stage 1 on roll for the past three years. The school is registered with the Department for Education (DfE) to admit 64 pupils. There are 43 pupils on roll, including 13 students in the sixth form. Four pupils are looked after by their local authorities. The school is privately owned by Autism Anglia. The school first opened in 1977 and has been established at its current site since 2005. The school uses a range of alternative providers for older pupils and sixth-form students.
p.5
Information about this school
Alternative providers include: – Chelmsford and Colchester Colleges, for vocational training – Butterfly Lodge near Colchester, for animal care and horticulture – Halstead swimming pool – Mersea youth camp, for outdoor activities – Zinc Arts in Ongar – The Art Café in Colchester, for work experience. Residential care for up to 294 nights per year is provided for 11 pupils and some respite residential provision is available for day pupils. The school’s residential provision was previously inspected on 9 to 11 February 2017, when the overall experiences and progress of children and young people were judged as ‘requires improvement’. The headteacher was appointed in September 2016 and new senior leaders took up post in January 2017.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards and other requirements that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection. Following the school’s standard inspection in February 2017, the Department for Education (DfE) issued a statutory notice in April 2017. The school was required to submit an action plan to address the unmet independent school standards. Ofsted evaluated the action plan in June 2017 and judged it to be acceptable. This is the school’s first progress monitoring inspection since its standard inspection in February 2017. It was carried out without notice. The inspector was asked to report against the independent school standards contained within Part 3 Welfare, health and safety of pupils, and Part 8 Quality of leadership in and
p.7
Information about this inspection
management of schools. The inspector held discussions with senior staff, teachers and governors. The inspector scrutinised a wide range of documentation related to safeguarding and child protection and visited classes in key stages 2, 3, 4 and 5 with the headteacher. A standard social care inspection of the school took place from 9 to 11 October 2017. There is a separate report for that inspection.
p.7
Inspection team
Jenny Carpenter, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection team
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.8
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visitwww.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.8
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion