Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Independent school inspection

Greater Grace School of Christian Education

Inspected 3 Oct 2017 · published 9 Nov 2017 · URN 131791

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Neil Dixon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Oct 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Neil Dixon

  • Postcode verified

    CH2 4BE

  • Name on report verified

    Greater Grace School of Christian Education

  • URN verified

    131791

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−40Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveindependenteffectivelyconsistentlysecuresafeclearsuccessfully
Criticismnot metfailedweaknessesunclearnot strongdeficienciespoorlyconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings2219w−42
  • What needs to improve63w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,228
about usual (typical 1813)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 49
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

School progress monitoring inspection report

p.1

Greater Grace School of Christian Education Church Lane, Backford, Chester, Cheshire CH2 4BE

p.1

Main inspection findings

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraphs 7, 7(a), 7(b)  At the time of the last inspection the school‟s safeguarding policy was out of date and did not make reference to the most up-to-date guidance issued by the Secretary of State. Staff had not received appropriate training on key aspects of safeguarding such as „Prevent‟ and the school‟s relationship with the local authority over safeguarding matters was not strong enough.  In the action plan submitted to the Department for Education (DfE), the proprietor did not provide evidence that staff had accessed suitable training in order to update their knowledge and understanding of safeguarding. Leaders‟ plans for safeguarding to feature as a standard agenda item at staff meetings were unclear as to the purpose or intended impact of this action. The action plan also failed to make clear how leaders intended to improve links with the local authority.

p.1

Main inspection findings

 Leaders have ensured that the safeguarding culture within the school has been significantly strengthened since the previous inspection. Staff and trustees have accessed safeguarding training at an appropriate level and consequently now have a secure understanding of good safeguarding practice, including „Prevent‟. Trustees say that their training has made them realise that safeguarding issues „can happen anywhere‟ and they now recognise the need to be vigilant at all times.  The school‟s safeguarding policy, which is available on the school website, is now up to date and refers to the current guidance issued by the Secretary of State. Staff have a good understanding of the policy and so now know the procedures to follow if they have any concerns about a pupil‟s well-being. They also have a good awareness of the warning signs that may alert them to potential issues.  Leaders have successfully established much closer links with the local authority and

p.1

Main inspection findings

other agencies. The safeguarding policy that leaders have put in place is drawn from the local authority‟s best-practice guidance. Some of the safeguarding training accessed by staff and trustees was organised and led by members of the local authority‟s safeguarding team. Staff and some pupils have also benefited from attending training about staying safe on the internet (e-safety).  Leaders‟ effective actions in safeguarding and promoting the welfare of pupils at the school, and in complying with current guidance, have ensured that this standard is now met. Paragraph 11  This standard was identified as unmet when the school was last inspected. The quality of the premises was described as „variable‟ and leaders were not ensuring that the school‟s policy on health and safety was being followed effectively. The subsequent action plan identified some actions to remedy the identified deficiencies, but was unclear as to how

p.1

Main inspection findings

leaders would ensure that effective ongoing checks were carried out.  The school now has a detailed and robust policy document on health and safety, and leaders have established a programme of ongoing maintenance to ensure that the premises are fit for purpose. In addition to routine maintenance being carried out, improvements to specific areas of concern identified by the last inspection have been carried out. For example, electrical distribution boards have been securely boxed in to ensure that pupils are not able to accidentally touch them, and the external fencing around the site has been repaired. Leaders, including trustees, are now more vigilant when thinking about health and safety, and ensure that the effectiveness of the school‟s arrangements for health and safety is discussed and evaluated regularly.  The school‟s written health and safety policy is implemented effectively, and this standard is now met.

p.2

Main inspection findings

Paragraphs 16, 16(a), 16(b)  At the time of the previous inspection this standard was identified as unmet because the school‟s approach to assessing and managing risk was not strong enough. Risks to pupils, such as from poorly maintained premises and grounds, were not robustly identified and measures were not routinely taken to swiftly tackle any such risks.  The action plan submitted to the DfE recognised weaknesses in the school‟s approach and identified a number of potential risks, and strategies to address them. However, school leaders did not submit any evidence to illustrate the impact of any actions taken, nor did they submit a risk assessment policy.  School leaders‟ approach to managing potential risks has improved. In the school building and grounds, potential risks are identified and addressed through a well- organised schedule of risk assessments and planned maintenance. As a result, the

p.2

Main inspection findings

school premises provide pupils with a suitably safe and secure learning environment. Leaders have also ensured that detailed risk assessments are in place for activities away from the school site, such as educational visits and physical education sessions held at local sports facilities. Appropriate action is therefore being taken to reduce risks that are identified.  This standard is not met, though, because leaders have not put in place a written risk assessment policy. The headteacher now appreciates the need to have such a policy in place and plans are now in place to develop an appropriate policy. Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools Paragraphs 23(1), 23(1)(c)  This standard was not met when the school was last inspected because the school did not have suitable changing accommodation or showers in place for pupils aged 11 years or over at the start of the school year who receive physical education.

p.2

Main inspection findings

 The action plan submitted to the DfE indicated that leaders had identified a potential location for the installation of showering facilities and were exploring the likely costs.  Leaders have fully costed plans in place to install a shower in school but have not yet identified a likely date for completion of this work. However, they have ensured that pupils now have access to a good range of physical education and sporting activities, including badminton, tennis, football and athletics, by delivering sessions at local sports centres and clubs. These venues have appropriate changing and showering facilities. Leaders have ensured that suitable risk assessments are in place so that any potential risks of using off-site facilities are identified and suitably addressed. Pupils are therefore not disadvantaged by the lack of changing and showering facilities at the school.  However, this standard about the premises and accommodation at the school is not met

p.3

Main inspection findings

because there are currently no suitable changing and showering facilities at school. Paragraphs 24, 24(1)(a), 24(1)(b)  At the time of the last inspection this standard was identified as not met because there was no suitable accommodation in school to cater for pupils‟ medical needs. In the school‟s subsequent action plan, leaders had identified two rooms to be used when pupils require medical attention. However, it was unclear from the action plan whether these rooms would be suitable and comply with the requirements of the standard.  Leaders have made adaptations to a cloakroom area so that it provides a suitable space for the short-term care of sick or injured pupils. A fold-out bed is available and the room has both toilet and washing facilities. It is also situated close to both classrooms and the main entrance to school for ease of access.  A second room, closer to the playground, has been identified as being suitable for the

p.3

Main inspection findings

examination and treatment of sick or injured pupils. The room is used as an occasional activity space by pupils, and is adjacent to the junior classroom. The door into the classroom can be shut to ensure privacy but also allows any pupils using the room to join others in the junior classroom safely and with minimal disruption.  Leaders have thus ensured that there is suitable accommodation to cater for pupils‟ immediate medical needs, and to care for sick or injured pupils on a short-term basis. This standard is now met. Paragraphs 29(1), 29(1)(b)  The inspection in October 2016 found that this standard was not met as there were a number of hazards relating to the school‟s playground that meant it was not a suitably safe space for pupils to play outside. The report noted that „good-quality, routine maintenance has not been sustained.‟ Leaders submitted a premises plan as part of their action plan to detail how they intended to remedy issues with the outdoor play space but

p.3

Main inspection findings

did not submit evidence of the impact of any actions taken.  The outdoor space available to pupils, including a small playground and garden area, has been transformed. Leaders have ensured that the previously broken wire fence has been repaired and gaps to neighbouring properties fenced. As a result, the site is now secure and the fence does not present a safety hazard. It is clear that regular maintenance is being undertaken and the site is now free from potentially dangerous debris.  Pupils enjoy using the outdoor areas. During the inspection pupils played football enthusiastically on the playground and told me that they were looking forward to using the basketball hoops for another game. Other pupils sat and chatted happily in the garden area.  The outdoor space at school is safe and suitable for pupils to play outside, and so this standard is met. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

p.3

Main inspection findings

Paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b), 34(1)(c)  This standard was unmet at the previous inspection. Weaknesses in the effectiveness of leadership and management meant that the school failed to meet a significant number of the independent school standards. The report also stated that trustees had limited capacity to ensure that the necessary improvements were made and standards met. The subsequent action plan addressed some of these issues but did not provide sufficient detail as to how leaders and trustees intended to monitor the impact of their actions.  Those responsible for the leadership and management of the school, including the trustees, have substantially increased their knowledge and understanding of their different roles and their responsibilities in ensuring that the school meets the independent school standards. They have accessed well-chosen training and put policies and procedures in place which have enabled the school to meet a number of standards

p.4

Main inspection findings

that were previously unmet.  Central to these improvements has been the drive of the headteacher and the increased participation of the trustees in moving the school forward. As one trustee explained, they now recognise that their role is „much more than simply balancing the books‟. Trustees now meet together typically half-termly. Evidence gathered from discussions with trustees and minutes of their meetings confirm that they are providing the headteacher with a more effective balance of support and challenge. The work of leaders and trustees has secured improvements in the quality of the school premises and accommodation, arrangements for health and safety and safeguarding and links with other bodies. They are actively promoting pupils‟ well-being.  Leaders are not, however, wholly effective in fulfilling their responsibilities because some of the independent school standards are still not met. Consequently, this standard is not

p.4

Main inspection findings

met. Leaders are aware of those standards that remain unmet and are actively seeking to take further action to ensure that the school complies with those standards as well. Schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010  Appropriate arrangements are in place to ensure that the school meets the requirements of paragraph 3 of schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010.

p.4

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 („the independent school standards‟) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.

p.5

The school does not meet the following independent school standards

Standards that were not met at the previous inspection and remain unmet at this inspection  The proprietor must ensure that the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy (paragraphs 16, 16(a)).  The proprietor must ensure that changing accommodation and showers are provided for pupils aged 11 years or over at the start of the school year who receive physical education (paragraphs 23(1), 23(1)(c)).  The proprietor must ensure that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently and fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently (paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b)).

p.5

The school now meets the following independent school standards

 The proprietor must ensure that arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school, and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State (paragraphs 7, 7(a), 7(b)).  The proprietor must ensure that relevant health and safety laws are complied with by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written health and safety policy (paragraph 11).  The proprietor must ensure that appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified (paragraph 16(b)).  The proprietor must ensure that suitable accommodation is provided in order to cater for the medical and therapy needs of pupils, including accommodation for the medical examination and treatment of pupils and accommodation for the short-term care of sick and injured pupils, which includes a washing facility and is near to a toilet facility (paragraphs 24(1), 24(1)(a), 24(1)(b)).

p.5

The school now meets the following independent school standards

 The proprietor must ensure that suitable outdoor space is provided in order to enable pupils to play outside (paragraphs 29(1), 29(1)(b)).  The proprietor must ensure that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school actively promote the well-being of pupils (paragraph 34(1)(c)).

p.5

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school‟s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.6

School details

Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed

p.6

School details

Of which, number on roll in sixth form 1

p.6

School details

Proprietor Trustees of Greater Grace School of Christian Education Chair Alastair Craddock

p.6

School details

Website www.wix.com/greatergraceschool/ggs

p.6

School details

Date of previous standard inspection 18–20 October 2016

p.6

Information about this school

 Greater Grace School of Christian Education is situated in a small village near Chester.  The school is registered to admit 14 pupils aged from five to 18 years. There are currently six pupils on roll, aged between six and 16 years. Pupils are taught in two classes, one for pupils of primary age and one for the older pupils.  The school does not use any alternative provision.  The school states its desire „to serve the Body of Christ by complementing the parental responsibility to “train up a child in the way he should go”.‟  As a condition of pupil admission, at least one parent must be a „born-again‟ Christian and regularly attend their own local church.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards and other requirements that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection.  This was the first progress monitoring inspection following the school‟s previous standard inspection in October 2016.  The DfE rejected the school‟s action plan following the previous inspection.  The inspection was conducted without notice to the school.  During the inspection, the inspector held meetings with the headteacher and one of the trustees. The inspector also had telephone conversations with two of the other trustees, including the chair. The inspector toured the school and visited both classes. The inspector spoke to staff and pupils and scrutinised a range of relevant policies and

p.8

Information about this inspection

documentation. The single central record was checked and safeguarding policies and procedures were reviewed.

p.8

Inspection team

Neil Dixon, lead inspector Her Majesty‟s Inspector guidance „Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted‟, which is available from Ofsted‟s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child‟s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visitwww.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.9

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children‟s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children‟s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion