Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Risley Lower Grammar CE (VC) Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Oct 2017
- Inspectors verified
David Bray
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
DE72 3SU
- Name on report verified
Risley Lower Grammar CE (VC) Primary School
- URN verified
112850
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve leadership and management so that the school’s expectations are more consistently used and applied, by: – ensuring that subject leaders check that additional training and resources provided for staff are leading to more pupils making good progress, especially in key stage 2 – improving the assessment of foundation subjects, such as history, geography, p.2
- An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- Although leaders are aware of the need to improve gaps in pupils’ reading and mathematics skills, they have not been successful yet in ensuring that pupils make consistently good progress. p.3
- Staff are aware of the increasingly diverse profile of the pupils attending the school but are not consistently engaging and motivating the minority who currently find learning difficult. p.3
- The systems to promote positive behaviour have been updated and revised but are not used effectively enough in a small number of classes. p.3
- Teachers who have responsibility for subjects have provided additional training and resources for staff. p.3
- They have not checked carefully how well lessons have improved. p.3
- Pupils have the opportunity to study a good range of topics and subjects. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,242
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Risley Lower Grammar CE (VC) Primary School Derby Road, Risley, Derby, Derbyshire DE72 3SU
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Over time, pupils have not made consistently good progress. A minority of current pupils in Years 3, 4 and 5 have gaps in their learning, especially in reading and mathematics. Provisional 2017 key stage 2 test results show these pupils made poor progress in reading and mathematics. A minority of teaching does not engage and motivate a small group of pupils, especially some boys. The use of systems to promote good behaviour is not effective enough in a few classes. The additional support provided by teaching assistants is not planned well in some lessons. Although providing support for managing behaviour, they are not doing enough to help pupils learn well. The governing body has not held school leaders to account effectively enough. Subject leaders have not been effective enough in ensuring that teaching improves, especially in some aspects of reading and mathematics. The assessment of some subjects, such as
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
history, geography, languages and computing, requires further improvement.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The school has a strong ethos, based on Christian values. The headteacher has an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. School leaders have successfully improved the teaching of phonics and writing. They have also started to improve the teaching of reading and mathematics. The large majority of the younger pupils are making good progress in their ability to sound out letters. Writing has improved significantly. Key stage 1 test outcomes have been broadly average for several years. Effective arrangements are in place to ensure that pupils stay safe. Pupils and parents appreciate the good range of additional sporting and musical opportunities provided. Children make a good start in the Reception Year. They quickly adapt to the school’s expectations for behaviour. The large majority are making good progress.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching so that pupils make consistently good progress across all year groups, especially in reading and mathematics, by: – reducing gaps in some pupils’ understanding of mathematical concepts, especially in Years 3, 4 and 5 – developing some pupils’ skills in understanding more complex texts, especially in key stage 2 – ensuring that the work of teaching assistants is consistently planned well so they support pupils more effectively in all classes – developing the planning of lessons to make work more interesting for some pupils, especially boys, who become disengaged. Improve leadership and management so that the school’s expectations are more consistently used and applied, by: – ensuring that subject leaders check that additional training and resources provided for staff are leading to more pupils making good progress, especially in key stage 2 – improving the assessment of foundation subjects, such as history, geography,
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
languages and computing – ensuring that the school’s behaviour management systems are used effectively in all classes. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Although leaders are aware of the need to improve gaps in pupils’ reading and mathematics skills, they have not been successful yet in ensuring that pupils make consistently good progress. Staff are aware of the increasingly diverse profile of the pupils attending the school but are not consistently engaging and motivating the minority who currently find learning difficult. The systems to promote positive behaviour have been updated and revised but are not used effectively enough in a small number of classes. Teachers who have responsibility for subjects have provided additional training and resources for staff. They have not checked carefully how well lessons have improved. Pupils have the opportunity to study a good range of topics and subjects. Assessment is mostly accurate. However, the assessment of foundation subjects, such as history, geography, languages and computing, is still underdeveloped.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The headteacher has an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. The teaching of phonics and writing has improved. Leaders have ensured that reading and mathematics are priorities in their plans for improvement. Strong links with the local church provide good opportunities for regular assemblies. Parents attend these regularly. Several commented on how they value this part of the school’s provision. The school promotes British values through assemblies and in specific topics studied during lessons. The physical education and sport premium funding provides a good range of additional activities. The range of sporting provision is good in this small school. Pupils receive a good range of opportunities to learn musical instruments and take part in additional musical activities. The school organises a good range of additional trips and activities to support pupils in their learning.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The use of pupil premium funding is planned and evaluated carefully by school leaders. The additional resources and support for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are planned carefully and leaders check to see they are working well. The school provides pupils with good opportunities to develop their understanding of spiritual, moral, social and cultural topics. The local authority has provided a range of additional training that has contributed to improvements made to the teaching of phonics and in the early years provision.
p.3
Governance of the school
Although the governing body supports the school well, its members have not provided sufficient challenge for school leaders. The governing body has a more positive view of the school than is justified. Governors have not questioned sufficiently the links between pay and teachers’ performance. The governing body has a good range of skills. Governors have participated in regular training and sought to identify their needs. Arrangements to promote safeguarding are checked carefully and regularly.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Checks made prior to employment ensure that the school has suitably trained and qualified staff. Staff receive regular training in safeguarding, including how to be aware of issues that may cause concern. The arrangements for reporting and recording any worries are well organised and clear. The school maintains good links with outside agencies and uses them to support pupils who require extra help. The pupils spoken with said they felt safe in school. Staff who completed a survey felt that pupils were safe from bullying. A small group of parents who completed Parent View expressed concerns about the behaviour of a minority of pupils. Other parents feel happy with this aspect of the school.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teaching is inconsistent across the school. The planning of a small number of lessons results in tasks that are dull or repetitive. A minority of teaching does not engage and motivate some pupils, especially boys. This can result in them not concentrating on their work. Systems to promote good behaviour have been updated and developed but are not used well in a few classes. A small number of pupils are not able to modify their behaviour well. They find it especially difficult to behave well without adult supervision. The plans for the work of teaching assistants are not consistently effective. On occasions, they become drawn into supporting pupils with their behaviour but do not improve their learning well. The teaching of reading has started to improve. Phonics is taught systematically across the school and this aspect of learning is effective. However, pupils in Years 3, 4 and 5, in particular, are not secure enough in understanding texts that are more complex.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The teaching of writing has improved over time. Pupils gain secure skills in key stage 1 and are able to apply these well across a range of subjects in key stage 2. The teaching of mathematics is not yet secure. Some pupils in Years 3, 4 and 5 have not gained a good enough understanding of tables or confidence in division. This holds them back as they move through the classes. The teaching of the most able pupils is enabling them to make good progress. These pupils work hard and consistently try their best. There are very few pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. They receive extra support and help, either in class or in smaller groups. Most are making good progress.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. The characteristics of pupils attending the school have changed over time. A greater proportion have joined from outside the catchment area. A small number of pupils do not settle down in lessons, and this can sometimes have a negative effect on the progress made by other pupils. The large majority of pupils take pride in the school. They are willing to improve work based on the feedback they receive from teachers. The large majority of pupils listen well to each other and are able to consider a wide range of views about different topics they study. Pupils receive regular guidance about how to stay safe when using computers and they learn about the importance of road safety.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. A small group of pupils, mainly boys, find it difficult to behave well in a small number of lessons. They occasionally engage in low-level disruption. Most pupils behave well during lunchtimes and breaktimes. They respond positively to adult supervision and have regard for the safety and well-being of other pupils. A few, mainly boys, find it more difficult to manage their own behaviour without adult help. The attendance of pupils is broadly average. A very small number of pupils attend less well. However, they are either improving their attendance or there are specific reasons why they have been absent. Pupils are used to attending regular assemblies held in the local church. The school does not have its own hall and this provides a valuable resource for this aspect of the school’s provision. Pupils are able to walk to the church in a sensible way. They all sit
p.5
Behaviour
and listen with interest and engagement.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
The results achieved by pupils in national tests have fluctuated because of the small cohort size in each year group. One pupil is equivalent to about five percentage points when comparisons are made with national progress and attainment data. Over time, pupils have not made consistently good progress across the school. In particular, the pupils who took key stage 2 tests in 2017 made poor progress in reading and mathematics. This cohort had a small group of pupils whose behaviour and attitudes to learning were not characteristic for this school. In 2016, pupils who took national key stage 2 tests made average progress from their starting points. Their attainment was also average. Some pupils in Years 3, 4 and 5 still have gaps in their learning, especially in their reading and mathematics skills. This means they are not making consistently good progress. The proportion achieving the expected standard in the Year 1 national phonics
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
screening check in 2016 was well below average. However, by the end of Year 2, this same group of pupils had caught up with their peers. The proportion achieving the expected standard in 2017 improved and was broadly average. By the end of Year 2, pupils’ attainment has been broadly average for several years. Over time, pupils have made good progress from their starting points. The large majority of pupils are ready for the next stage of their learning. The very small number of disadvantaged pupils make progress from their starting points that is similar to that of their peers. This is also the case for the very small number who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. The most able pupils make good progress from their starting points. Pupils make good progress in their writing. This aspect of learning has improved significantly because it has been a school priority over the last two years.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Additional sessions provided for individual pupils are helping many to start to catch up where they have gaps in their reading and mathematics skills.
p.6
Early years provision Good
Children start in the Reception Year with skills and abilities that are broadly typical for their age. A few boys, in particular, are behind girls in their skills, especially in writing. Over time, children have made expected progress from these starting points. In 2016, the proportion who achieved a good level of development fell to below average. This was because a few children, mostly boys, did not make sufficient progress, especially in their writing skills. Leaders have ensured that additional training and support have improved this area of provision. The proportion of children who achieved a good level of development increased in 2017. It is now broadly average. Accurate assessments provide staff with good information about children’s skills when they start in the Reception Year. Well-planned activities help them to improve any areas identified. School staff make good links with a range of other organisations, including nursery
p.6
Early years provision Good
settings. This helps children to settle well into the Reception Year. The learning is organised well. Children join in with Year 1 activities that are appropriate for their learning. The work of the teaching assistant is well planned and effective. Children settle quickly into the routines and expectations for the class. They behave well during lessons and when playing with the good range of resources provided. Safeguarding arrangements are effective and well organised. Parents receive good information about learning through the use of regular updates through the internet. Many parents respond by adding their own comments about learning at home. A small number of boys are still behind when they start Year 1.
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Email address headteacher@risley.derbyshire.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 18–19 October 2012
p.8
Information about this school
This is smaller than the average-sized primary school. Pupils are currently grouped into four mixed-age classes, while Year 6 pupils are taught as a separate group. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is low. The proportion of pupils who are eligible for pupil premium funding is low. The majority of pupils are from a White British heritage. Over time, the nature of the pupil intake has changed. Currently, three quarters of pupils come from outside the local catchment area. The range of pupils’ needs has grown over this period as well. The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.
p.8
Information about this inspection
The inspector observed learning in 15 lessons, or part-lessons. Pupils were heard reading during lessons and six pupils met the inspector during a lunchtime break. Pupils also talked with the inspector during sessions around the school. Fifteen pupils completed the survey for this inspection and their views were considered. The inspector attended a whole-school assembly in the local church, as well as sessions organised by visiting specialists providing musical tuition and sports activities for pupils. Meetings were held with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, chair of the governing body, two other governors, one class teacher and a representative from Derbyshire local authority. Information about the school’s planning, its self-evaluation, published data and other monitoring documentation were checked. The inspector took account of the 61 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View), spoke individually with several parents during the inspection and reviewed a
p.10
Information about this inspection
letter sent in by one parent. The responses to a survey completed by nine staff were reviewed.
p.10
Inspection team
David Bray, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion