Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

St John's Sunshine Pre-school

Inspected 18 Oct 2017 · published 7 Nov 2017 · URN EY490657

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    St John's Sunshine Pre-School

  • Group reference verified

    RP905343

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Oct 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Maura Pigram

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    RH10 3ZQ

  • Name on report verified

    St John's Sunshine Pre- school

  • URN verified

    EY490657

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressvery welleffectiveenjoyextremelysecurepoliteconsistently
Criticismnot stronggapsnot effectivelynot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings546w+70
  • Leadership117w+20
  • What needs to improve64w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
719
about usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 50
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 9%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 44%

Full report text

St John's Sunshine Pre- school The Parish Hub, Borers Arms Road, Copthorne, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 3ZQ

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 18 October 2017 Not applicable

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2

p.1

This provision is good

 The manager and the well-qualified staff team work hard to create a stimulating and interesting environment for children. They observe and interact well with children as they play, helping children to make good progress in their learning and development.  Children are encouraged to behave well. Staff manage any minor disagreements effectively and teach children to understand age-appropriate expectations. Children are polite and older children show good levels of confidence.  Parents speak very highly about the manager and her staff. They say that new ideas implemented have been extremely beneficial for their children, such as the introduction of book bags to take home and share. Parents receive frequent information about their children's progress and they feel very involved in their children's learning.  The committee and the management team work together very well to identify areas to develop. Since registration, they have consistently evaluated the quality of the provision

p.1

This provision is good

to identify achievable targets and improve practice further. The views of all staff, children and parents are included in this process.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 At times, staff are overly enthusiastic in providing answers for children. For instance, they do not give children enough time to consider and reply to questions themselves.  The monitoring of staff performance is not strong enough to clearly identify how individual staff members can raise the quality of their teaching practice even further.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 allow children time to gather their thoughts, in particular so they can consider information provided and have the opportunity to answer questions independently  extend the arrangements for staff performance management to help identify and build on their teaching skills, to raise the quality of teaching to the highest level.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact of these activities on children's learning.  The inspector looked at samples of children's records and planning documentation. She also looked at evidence of the suitability of the committee members and the staff working with the children.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager. She held a meeting with the manager, the deputy manager and the chairperson of the pre-school.  The inspector spoke with the staff team and children at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector spoke to a selection of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is good

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff are secure in their knowledge of the procedures to follow if they are concerned about children's welfare. They complete thorough risk assessments. There are good procedures for the safe recruitment of staff and for checking the suitability of all staff and committee members. The manager welcomes the experience of staff, such as qualified teachers, to support children's learning. Ongoing training helps all staff to develop their practice and skills further. The manager works closely with the staff to observe, assess and plan for each child's learning. She shares this information with parents and other professionals, such as speech and language therapists, to identify and address any gaps in children's learning.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

Children enjoy exploring outdoors and learning about the wider world. For example, they have fun experimenting with magnifying glasses and finding items of interest, such as feathers and pumpkin seeds. Staff help children to have a secure understanding of numbers and early mathematical language, through games and routines. For example, they discuss how many skittles are knocked over. Children excitedly find numbered cards and staff provide lots of praise. Staff make good use of teaching strategies to help children develop their hand-eye coordination and hand muscles. For instance, they teach children how to use a range of tools skilfully when making models from dough and clay.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good

Effective key-person arrangements help new children feel secure. Staff manage children's health and safety well and promote children's independence successfully during the day. For example, children help to care for the environment as they wash up following their snack, and they know where to place the cups and plates. Children follow good hygiene routines and remind each other not to run indoors. Staff provide ongoing opportunities for children to enjoy fresh air and physical exercise outdoors. Staff support children effectively when they leave the pre-school and move on to school. For example, staff introduce specific books, stories and activities to help children with this change. This supports children's emotional well-being.

p.3

Outcomes for children are good

Children, including those who receive funded education, make good progress from their starting points. They are motivated and develop a good range of skills in readiness for their future learning, such as starting school. Younger children show an interest in writing letters using pens. They readily help themselves to books to support their early reading. Older children are confident and show that they recognise numbers and shapes. They solve problems and use language related to adding and subtracting.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY490657 Local authority West Sussex Inspection number 1015771 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 20 Number of children on roll 20 Name of registered person St John's Sunshine Pre-School

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection Not applicable Telephone number 07963 501762 / 01342 716727

p.4

reference number

St John's Sunshine Pre-school registered in 2015. It operates from a church hall in Copthorne, Crawley, in West Sussex. The pre-school is open each weekday from 9.15am to 12.15pm, during term time only. The setting employs seven staff. Of these, two hold qualified teacher status and four staff hold early years qualifications at level 3 or above. The setting receives funding to provide free early education for children aged three and four years.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion