Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Market Deeping Community Primary School

Inspected 4 Oct 2017 · published 1 Nov 2017 · URN 120398

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

John Lawson (lead), Caroline Evans, Pete Strauss, Rebecca King

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Oct 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Caroline Evans, John Lawson, Pete Strauss, Rebecca King

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    PE6 8JE

  • Name on report verified

    Market Deeping Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    120398

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositiveeffectivelymake good progressvery wellconfidentimprovedstrong
Criticismnot consistentlyrequires improvementinconsistentconcernspoortoo oftentoo fewnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings884w+2
  • Leadership178w+43
  • Safeguarding134w+22
  • What needs to improve1999w+35

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
3,123
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 51%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Market Deeping Community Primary School Willoughby Avenue, Market Deeping, Peterborough, Lincolnshire PE6 8JE

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Senior leaders have not been quick enough to prioritise and take action against all of the areas for improvement identified in the last inspection.  Leaders’ plans for improvement are not sufficiently sharp. They lack the precision necessary to support school improvements.  The governing body are not tenacious enough in challenging the school’s leaders about pupils’ attainment and progress.  The quality of teaching and learning in key stages 1 and 2 is not consistently good. Too often, the most able pupils do not make enough progress in lessons because they are not challenged effectively.  Teachers’ expectations of the presentation of pupils’ work and the accuracy of their spelling and use of punctuation are not high enough.  Pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, do not make as much progress as they should in reading, writing and, particularly, mathematics in key stage 2.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The new headteacher is quickly building a cohesive, enthusiastic team of staff who are committed to taking the school forward.  Children make a very good start to their school education in the early years. They make good progress due to the quick identification of their needs and actions to address them.  The proportions of pupils achieving the standard expected for their age are above the national averages in reading, writing and mathematics in key stages 1 and 2.  Pupils’ behaviour and conduct in classrooms and around the school are consistently good. Pupils collaborate and work very well together.  Senior leaders and the governing body have established stability in staffing.  The school’s promotion of pupils’ personal development and welfare is very effective. Pupils are positive, confident and caring. They feel safe, and are kept safe.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment in order to accelerate pupils’ progress by making sure that all teachers: – use assessment information effectively to ensure that teaching and activities are accurately matched to pupils’ abilities, including those who are disadvantaged and the most able pupils – have consistently high expectations of the quality and presentation of pupils’ work, and the accuracy of their spelling and punctuation in all subjects – teach pupils the skills and understanding they need in mathematics to develop their reasoning skills and become effective problem solvers.  Improve the effectiveness of leadership, management and governance to drive more rapid improvement by ensuring that: – leaders’ evaluation of the school’s performance is rigorous and accurately identifies focused objectives for improvement – improvement plans set challenging targets in relation to the progress of different

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

groups of pupils, including those who are disadvantaged – leaders further support and develop the effectiveness of middle leaders so that they are clear on their roles and responsibilities, and are equipped to accelerate pupils’ progress in their areas of responsibility.  Improve the effectiveness of governance by ensuring that the governing body: – improves its grasp of the progress of groups of pupils to more stringently hold leaders to account for the achievement of pupils, including those who are disadvantaged – more effectively holds the school to account for the use and impact of additional funding, such as the pupil premium and primary school sport funding. An external review of governance should be undertaken to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 The new headteacher is establishing a culture of drive and ambition to improve pupils’ attainment and progress. Leaders and the governing body have not, however, been quick enough to secure the improvements identified by the last inspection. They have not been accurate enough in evaluating the school’s performance and strategically identifying the key areas and actions needed to improve the school, or deciding which have the highest priority.  School development planning does not identify focused targets and measures of success to gauge accurately the impact of actions to improve the quality of teaching and rates of pupils’ progress. Much information is available, but leaders do not use this as strategically as they should. As a result, some pupils do not make the progress they should.  There have been many changes to staffing since the last inspection and the governing body have worked hard to recruit staff. Since his appointment in September 2017, the

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

new headteacher has worked quickly to put a new leadership structure in place. New key stage leaders have been recently appointed and they are beginning to bring about improvements in their areas of responsibility. Leaders, other staff and governors met at the beginning the term to redefine the school’s core values. Staff are positive about changes made and a cohesive leadership team is developing. Staff speak of improved communications and an open culture. Leaders are clarifying roles and responsibilities. The development of the new leadership team is, however, still at an early stage and not yet as effective as it needs to be to drive more rapid school improvement.  Leaders have provided staff with training to improve the quality of teaching and learning. This includes developing the accuracy of teachers’ assessment by working with other local schools, promoting pupils’ positive attitudes to learning and approaches

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

to planning and teaching mathematics. It is too early for some of this work to have had significant impact. Staff training is not strategically planned and carefully linked to clearly defined targets for improvement.  The coordinator for the provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities has a clear overview of provision. She is an effective champion for pupils and rapidly identifies when interventions are needed. The additional funding for these pupils is generally used effectively. Many parents are very positive about the support the school provides for pupils with additional needs or who need extra help. Leaders, however, do not have a sufficiently clear overview of the impact of provision on these pupils’ progress.  Leaders ensure that disadvantaged pupils receive academic and pastoral support relevant to their needs. For some pupils, the pupil premium is used effectively to help

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

them make strong progress. However, this is not consistent and too few disadvantaged pupils attain the higher levels. Leaders do not check the progress of these pupils rigorously enough.  Leaders have reviewed the school’s curriculum in light of the mixed- and single-age classes to ensure that the curriculum is broad and balanced. Staff provide a range of enrichment activities, such as the recent science and art days, external visitors, and a wide range of extra-curricular clubs. Staff promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural education well. Pupils have a very good understanding of British values and, overall, are well prepared for life in modern Britain. Their understanding of a range of different religions, however, is not as secure as it should be.  Leaders use the additional funds provided through the primary physical educational and sport premium to good effect. In addition to providing teaching and coaching

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

skills, pupils have increased access to sporting activities.

p.4

Governance of the school

 The governing body does not effectively evaluate the school’s performance to set the strategic direction of the school. Governors’ understanding of pupils’ progress and attainment is not as good as it needs to be to enable them to hold school leaders fully to account, including the impact of additional funding such as the pupil premium.  Governors undertake regular visits. They write summary reports of their findings from, for example, meeting with subject leaders, looking at pupils’ work or evaluating the school’s website. They do not use their often astute findings, however, as effectively as they should to help drive school improvement.  The governing body is forward looking. Governors have worked hard to provide a stable staffing structure and are supportive of the increasingly effective leadership team. They were part of school’s day in which staff and the governing body met to define the school’s values moving forward.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors have a clear understanding of the processes for managing the performance of teachers. They have undertaken a range of training, including safeguarding training and safer recruitment.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Leaders and other staff are very positive role models and ensure that there is an effective culture of safeguarding and care. Parents who spoke with inspectors were confident that staff are committed to pupils’ well-being and safety. Many parents commented on the friendly atmosphere.  Leaders ensure that statutory requirements are met. The school’s single central record and recruitment processes are thorough. The designated senior lead for safeguarding has received training and leaders are in the process of further refining systems for recording concerns raised and actions taken. Leaders make sure all staff are fully trained in keeping pupils safe, including awareness of the government’s ‘Prevent’ duty.  Leaders respond to concerns raised promptly and are tenacious in securing the involvement of outside agencies where appropriate.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching and learning are not consistently good. Teachers do not consistently have high enough expectations of the abilities of different pupils. As a result, some pupils, including the most able and those who are disadvantaged, sometimes do not make the progress they should.  Teachers do not use assessment information consistently well to match activities to pupils’ abilities or adapt teaching to enable pupils to make good progress. Teachers often give pupils the same activities or do not move them on to more challenging work quickly enough.  Teachers do not consistently have high expectations of the accuracy of pupils’ spelling and punctuation in their work. The quality of presentation in different subjects is inconsistent. Sometimes, teachers do not deal with pupils’ misconceptions or ensure that errors are corrected. This slows pupils’ progress.  In mathematics, teachers do not consistently ensure that pupils have frequent enough

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

opportunities to develop their problem-solving and reasoning skills. Pupils sometimes spend too long practising a skill they have already mastered, rather than progressing to more challenging work, for example by independently exploring problems. As a result, pupils, including the most able, do not consistently make the progress they should.  Teachers generally have a secure knowledge of the subjects they teach. Where teaching is strongest, teachers make effective use of apparatus and visual imagery. Teachers and teaching assistants often use questioning effectively to take pupils’ learning forward.  Teachers establish a positive environment for pupils to learn, which is rooted in mutual respect. Classroom routines are well organised. Pupils apply themselves diligently to tasks and work well together. Pupils behave well in lessons.  Teaching assistants often provide effective support and intervention to help pupils,

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

including those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, make progress in their learning.  Teachers set homework in line with the school’s policy to consolidate pupils’ learning or prepare them for lessons. Online opportunities are used to support the involvement of parents in understanding pupils’ homework in reading, writing, mathematics and other subjects.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils speak positively about their school. Pupils and parents say the school is a friendly and safe place. Pupils are taught about road safety and, by the end of key stage 2, have a good knowledge of how to keep themselves safe online. Pupils’ understanding is not as secure, however, in key stage 1.  Pupils are self-confident and reflective. Pupils in Year 5 spoke of a charity project in which their school ‘house points’, awarded for good behaviour or work, were converted to funds to support the building of a school in Africa. Pupils in key stage 2 spoke of a project on the Victorians in which they had learned about street children. One pupil said, ‘It shows us how lucky we are. We should not take things for granted.’ Pupils show empathy and awareness of the importance of understanding the lives of others.  Pupils say bullying sometimes occurs but that staff deal with any incidents promptly.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

Pupils are confident that staff quickly resolve any concerns they have. Leaders are working to develop even greater rigour in analysing potential trends and patterns and reporting more effectively to the governing body.  Staff promote a culture and ethos of respect in the school which is reflected in the attitudes of pupils. Pupils have a good understanding of British values. They relate ideas of democracy, the rule of law and respect to their school lives. They spoke of laws as ‘school rules for the country’, or how they applied democratic principles when they voted for the much appreciated undersea school mural. They understand the importance of respecting others who have different backgrounds or beliefs to their own.  Pupils told inspectors how they valued and enjoyed the roles of responsibility the school offers them, such as young leaders on the playground, membership of the school council and acting as house leaders.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils understand expectations of behaviour very well and are confident that staff will deal with instances of poor behaviour. Pupils’ conduct, inside and on the playground and at different times of the day, is good. Pupils are courteous and thoughtful towards each other, adults and visitors to the school.  Some parents and pupils commented on poor behaviour during assemblies. Some instances of this were observed by inspectors. Leaders are aware of this and working to further improve standards of behaviour.  Pupils in most classes are enthusiastic and apply themselves well to tasks set, even when work is not well matched to their abilities. Pupils work very well together.  Pupils are proud of their school. However, this is not consistently reflected in their work. The presentation and pride pupils take in their work is inconsistent in different classes and subjects.

p.6

Behaviour

 Attendance is above the national average, and improved in 2017 compared to the previous year. It has been above the national average for the last two years. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils, however, is below the national average. Leaders are aware of this and are proactive in working with the small number of families whose children are persistently absent in order to improve attendance for these pupils.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 The rates of progress for groups of pupils are inconsistent. Pupils’ progress in key stage 2 is not yet good in reading, writing and mathematics. In mathematics, progress has been below the national average for the last two years. Too often, pupils, including the most able, do not make the progress they should.  At the end of 2017, the proportion of children in the early years who attained a good level of development was above the national average. This is an improvement compared to the previous two years. The proportions of pupils meeting the required standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check exceeded the national averages for the last two years. The proportions of pupils reaching the standard expected for their age at the end of key stage 1 exceeded the national averages for reading, writing and mathematics. At the end of key stage 2, the proportions of pupils who attained the standard expected for their age exceeded the existing national averages for reading,

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

writing and mathematics. While attainment is strong, this does not, however, represent good progress from the starting points for some groups of pupils.  The quality of pupils’ work is inconsistent. Often, the quality of their writing is let down by incorrect spelling or inaccurate punctuation. In mathematics, work is sometimes too easy for pupils. There are too few instances of pupils, particularly the most able, being challenged to explain their mathematical thinking and reasoning.  School information and other data show that the attainment and progress of disadvantaged pupils are inconsistent. Very few disadvantaged pupils achieve at greater depth in reading, writing and mathematics in key stage 2.  Pupils learn phonics skills well. All pupils who inspectors read with had positive attitudes to reading and their books were generally well matched to their abilities. However, pupils still do not apply their phonics knowledge and understanding

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

consistently well in their writing, including in early key stage 2.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities often make sound progress from their starting points. Staff quickly identify pupils who need to catch up and intervene to ensure that they are taught what they need.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Children make a good start to their education in the early years. Most children enter the early years at levels of development that are typical or better for their age. As a result of good teaching, children of all abilities and backgrounds, including those that are disadvantaged, make good progress from their starting points. In 2017, the proportion of children achieving a good level of development improved compared to the previous year. Children are well prepared for the next stage of their education.  The leader of the early years, who is also one of the class teachers, has a good understanding of early years practice. New systems to assess early the different areas of children’s learning help to identify the strengths in provision and areas for development. Improvement planning, however, is not as strategic as it could be in using this information to further improve provision.  Teaching is good. Adults provide effective support for groups or individual children to

p.7

Early years provision Good

extend their thinking. Occasionally, the most able are not challenged to make the progress they could.  Parents are nearly unanimous in their praise about their children’s experiences in the early years. Some parents said that they felt communications could be more effective. The leader of the early years is aware of this and is considering carefully how this aspect can be improved.  Leaders’ early identification of children’s needs, the improved approach to planning and more rigorous checks on children’s progress are helping children to make good progress from their starting points. Strong teaching and appropriate interventions quickly equip children with the learning skills they need to be able to access the early years curriculum.  The leader of the early years has planned activities which capture children’s imaginations and enable them to explore and learn independently, both indoors and outdoors. Children have positive attitudes to learning and are confident. Children are

p.7

Early years provision Good

active learners who independently access learning. Children were observed making a digital film of their work to build a castle. Children were enthusiastic and one explained, ‘Look at this photo I’ve taken. He was a knight yesterday … he’s a robot today!’  Staff ensure that routines are quickly established and children settle quickly and engage positively with tasks provided. Behaviour is good. Children independently take advantage of opportunities for mark making and writing, including boys. They confidently use and apply their phonics knowledge in independent activities. Children are confident choosing, making decisions and explaining their reasons for doing so.  The safety and well-being of children are well managed and the early years welfare arrangements are met.

p.8

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.9

School details

Email address admin@marketdeeping.lincs.sch.uk

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 22–23 January 2013

p.9

Information about this school

 The headteacher took up post in September 2017. There have been a considerable number of staff changes since the previous inspection.  Market Deeping Community Primary school is an average-sized primary school. The school plans to expand in size in 2018.  The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The very large majority of pupils are of White British heritage. The proportions of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds or who speak English as an additional language are below the national averages.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above the national average.  In 2017, the school met the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ progress and attainment in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching in all year groups. Seventeen lessons were observed, some jointly with the headteacher. Inspectors looked at pupils’ work, listened to pupils read and spoke with them to evaluate the quality of their learning. They also examined the school’s most recent information on pupils’ achievement and progress and work in a sample of pupils’ books. Inspectors scrutinised a variety of documents relating to safeguarding, behaviour, attendance, the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, pupils’ attainment and progress, and staff performance. A range of plans for improvement was evaluated, as well as the school’s self-evaluation of its own performance and documents relating to the work of the governing body.  Inspectors spoke with parents informally at the start of the school day. They took account of the 49 responses to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, senior and

p.11

Information about this inspection

subject leaders, the coordinator for the provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, members of the governing body and a representative from the local authority. Discussions explored a wide range of subjects, including safeguarding arrangements.

p.11

Inspection team

John Lawson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.11

Inspection team

Caroline Evans Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.12

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion