Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
George Fentham Before & After School Club
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
The George Fentham Before and Afterschhool VMC Committee
- Group reference verified
RP520080
- Inspection date verified
3 Oct 2017
- Inspectors verified
Rupinder Phullar
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
B92 0AY
- Name on report verified
George Fentham Before & After School Club
- URN verified
261012
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Self-evaluation is not used effectively to identify and address any weaknesses in practice and breaches of requirements. p.1
- However, self-evaluation is weak overall and is not used effectively to identify breaches in the requirements and set priorities for further improvements. p.3
- Weakness in leadership and management, with regard to suitability checks of the committee, leads to children's overall safety and well-being being compromised. p.3
- The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of the changes to the management committee. p.1
- This puts children's well-being and welfare at risk. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure that there are effective vetting systems in place and Disclosure and Barring Service Checks are completed for all committee members 03/11/2017 p.2
- ensure Ofsted is notified of changes to the committee in a timely way 03/11/2017 p.2
- provide Ofsted with required information about the members of the committee to enable further suitability checks to be completed. 03/11/2017 p.2
- strengthen systems for monitoring staff practice as part of performance management to support staff to improve their personal effectiveness and help them deliver high- quality teaching p.2
- improve systems of self-evaluation to identify weakness in practice and improve the overall quality of the provision. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes4
“Children make good progress.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 903
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
George Fentham Before & After School Club George Fentham Endowed School, Fentham Road,Hampton in Arden, Solihull, West Midlands, B92 0AY
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 3 October 2017 23 March 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of the changes to the management committee. She has not provided Ofsted with the information required to enable further suitability checks to be completed. This puts children's well-being and welfare at risk. Systems to monitor staff practice are not rigorous enough to raise the quality of teaching to a higher level. Staff do not have enough opportunities to develop their skills and knowledge to improve the outcomes for children. Self-evaluation is not used effectively to identify and address any weaknesses in practice and breaches of requirements.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Teaching is good. Staff are experienced practitioners. They work well with staff in the school to plan a wide range of activities that enhances children's learning. Children make good progress. Partnerships with parents are good. Staff share regular information with parents about their child's day and offer ideas of how they can extend children's learning at home. Parents comment that staff are caring and approachable and that their children's confidence has grown. Through discussions and activities, children have many opportunities to learn about similarities and differences between themselves and others and to appreciate the wider world beyond their own experiences.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that there are effective vetting systems in place and Disclosure and Barring Service Checks are completed for all committee members 03/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure Ofsted is notified of changes to the committee in a timely way 03/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
provide Ofsted with required information about the members of the committee to enable further suitability checks to be completed. 03/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
strengthen systems for monitoring staff practice as part of performance management to support staff to improve their personal effectiveness and help them deliver high- quality teaching improve systems of self-evaluation to identify weakness in practice and improve the overall quality of the provision.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. She observed the lunchtime routine and staff interactions with children. The inspector held a meeting with the provider and spoke to staff, children and parents at appropriate times during the inspection. The inspector checked evidence of the suitability of staff and committee members and qualifications of all staff working with children. The inspector completed joint observations with the manager. The inspector spoke to parents during the inspection and reviewed written feedback provided.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The provider, who is also the manager, has failed to notify Ofsted of some of the committee members that are responsible for running the setting. She has also not provided Ofsted with the required information to enable completion of further suitability checks on all committee members. Staff have attended child protection training. They have a secure understanding of the procedures to follow should they have concerns about a child in their care. Suitable recruitment procedures are in place. The manager monitors the progress children make and shares this information with the school and parents to help ensure children receive the support that they need. Regular informal discussions help staff keep up to date with changes in legislation. However, the manager does not monitor staff practice to identify where further development opportunities are needed to raise the quality of teaching. The
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
manager seeks the views of parents and acts on their suggestions. She has addressed previous recommendations. However, self-evaluation is weak overall and is not used effectively to identify breaches in the requirements and set priorities for further improvements.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
Staff effectively support children by taking into account their individual learning and development needs. They provide a wide range of activities indoors and outside that matches children's interests and preferences. For example, some children enjoy playing with small-world toys and others prefer to play chase with their friends. Children's early writing skills are supported well. They enjoy creative activities as they learn to use different tools competently, such as scissors and glue sticks. They cut strips of paper and competently use glue sticks to create their own artwork. Staff remind children to use the tools correctly and safely. Children enjoy dressing up and engaging in role-play activities. For example, they pretend to go shopping and buy items from the shopkeeper. Staff skilfully join in, ask questions and help children to develop their thinking and problem- solving skills. Children learn to count, recognise numbers and attempt to solve simple
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
problems, helping to develop their mathematical skills. Staff praise children for their efforts and achievements, supporting them to remain engaged and motivated for longer.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Weakness in leadership and management, with regard to suitability checks of the committee, leads to children's overall safety and well-being being compromised. However, the environment in which children play is safe, secure and welcoming. Staff are good role models and speak to children in a calm and respectful manner. Children are encouraged to share and take turns during play and learn to look after the equipment and resources. Children enjoy healthy lunches provided by the school and have many opportunities to be physically active in the outdoor play area.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
Children's personal, social and emotional development is given a high priority. Their move between home into the setting and also from school is planned well to meet the needs of each child. Children develop a sense of security and build trusting relationships with the staff, which supports their emotional well-being. Children are inquisitive and confident communicators. They share their views and opinions freely as they make choices in their play and learning. Children's literacy skills are supported in a variety of ways. For example, the setting is rich in print and children regularly visit the library for story time. Children are gaining the key skills needed to become successful learners.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 261012 Local authority Solihull Inspection number 1090488 Type of provision Out of school provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 3 - 11 Total number of places 44 Number of children on roll 98 Name of registered person The George Fentham Before and Afterschhool VMC Committee
p.5
reference number
Date of previous inspection 23 March 2015 Telephone number 01675 443913
p.5
reference number
George Fentham Before & After School Club registered in 2001. The setting employs four members of childcare staff. Of these, three hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 2 and above. The club is open from 8am to 9am and from 3.20pm to 6pm. The wrap-around care for the nursery group runs from midday to 6pm, Monday to Friday, during term time. The setting also operates a holiday club, running from 8am to 5pm. They offer sessions throughout the week during the Easter holiday, four weeks in the summer holidays and during some half-term holidays.
p.5
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion