Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Leeds
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Oct 2017
- Inspectors verified
Susie Prince
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY366290
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder has insufficient knowledge of statutory requirements and has failed to identify areas of significant weakness. p.4
- The childminder does not know how to respond appropriately to comments that children may make that give cause for concern. p.4
- The childminder has a weak knowledge of child protection matters. p.1
- The childminder's interactions with children are weak. p.1
- She is not aware of how to identify children who may be at risk of exposure to extreme views and behaviours. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- improve knowledge of safeguarding matters, including how to respond appropriately to comments that children make that give cause for concern and how to recognise the indicators that children are at risk of being exposed to extreme ideas and behaviours 26/10/2017 p.2
- ensure that records of children's personal details are accessible at all times and available for inspection 26/10/2017 p.2
- ensure that appropriate professional development activities are undertaken to improve the overall quality of teaching, interactions and personal effectiveness 09/11/2017 p.2
- implement systems to observe and assess children's learning and to monitor their progress and plan for their next steps 09/11/2017 p.2
- ensure that the required progress check for children aged between two and three years is completed and provide a written summary to parents 09/11/2017 p.2
- make sure that children have access to quality toys and resources to ensure they are well engaged. p.2
- Promote each area of learning through a mixture of adult-led and child-initiated activities that takes into account children's needs and interests to enable them to make progress in their learning 09/11/2017 p.2
- improve partnerships with other settings that children attend and put in place systems to exchange information about children's learning with them to ensure a consistent approach 09/11/2017 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“The childminder's interactions with children are weak.” p.1Parents & families4
“Despite this, the childminder has positive relationships with parents.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 892
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 5 October 2017 16 May 2013
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder has a weak knowledge of child protection matters. She does not know how to respond to a disclosure of information that may affect children's safety or understand her responsibilities under 'Prevent' duty guidance. The childminder is unable to produce some documentation to confirm that she holds personal details for every child. The childminder's interactions with children are weak. She has not engaged in any professional development activities to ensure that she has the skills to interact and teach effectively. The childminder does not know how to use observation and assessment to accurately monitor children's progress and plan for their future learning. Furthermore, she does not provide parents with a written summary of the required progress check for children aged between two and three years. The environment is not suitably planned or equipped with enough resources to promote
p.1
This provision is inadequate
children's all-round learning. Planned activities do not effectively consider children's needs to ensure they make sufficient progress in their learning and development. The childminder does not exchange information about children's learning with other settings that they attend to promote continuity of learning. The childminder does not know how to help children to manage their feelings in appropriate ways.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The childminder is warm, friendly and welcoming. Children have positive relationships with her and are confident and relaxed in her care.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
improve knowledge of safeguarding matters, including how to respond appropriately to comments that children make that give cause for concern and how to recognise the indicators that children are at risk of being exposed to extreme ideas and behaviours 26/10/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that records of children's personal details are accessible at all times and available for inspection 26/10/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that appropriate professional development activities are undertaken to improve the overall quality of teaching, interactions and personal effectiveness 09/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
implement systems to observe and assess children's learning and to monitor their progress and plan for their next steps 09/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that the required progress check for children aged between two and three years is completed and provide a written summary to parents 09/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
make sure that children have access to quality toys and resources to ensure they are well engaged. Promote each area of learning through a mixture of adult-led and child-initiated activities that takes into account children's needs and interests to enable them to make progress in their learning 09/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve partnerships with other settings that children attend and put in place systems to exchange information about children's learning with them to ensure a consistent approach 09/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve knowledge and understanding of how to help children to manage their feelings appropriately to enable them to regulate their own behaviour. 09/11/2017
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector had a tour of the areas of the home that are used for childminding purposes. The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector looked at evidence of the suitability of adults in the household and a sample of policies, and discussed assessments of children's learning with the childminder. The inspector completed a joint observation with the childminder. The inspector spoke to the children and considered the views of parents provided through written feedback.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The childminder has insufficient knowledge of statutory requirements and has failed to identify areas of significant weakness. Safeguarding is not effective. The childminder does not know how to respond appropriately to comments that children may make that give cause for concern. She is not aware of how to identify children who may be at risk of exposure to extreme views and behaviours. Children's personal details are not stored effectively to make sure that they are accessible at all times. The childminder has a poor understanding of the learning and development requirements. She has not completed any professional development activities to equip her with the skills and knowledge to teach effectively. Information exchanged with other settings that children attend is not sufficiently focused on children's learning needs to promote continuity effectively. Despite this, the childminder has positive relationships with parents. She provides them with daily
p.4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
verbal feedback to share information about what children have been doing.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Teaching is poor. The childminder does not know how to observe, assess, monitor and plan for children's learning. There are limited good-quality toys and resources available to keep children motivated and promote their overall learning. The childminder does not consider children's interests and stages of development effectively. She often does things for children that they are capable of doing themselves and her interactions are weak. Planned activities are mundane and not challenging enough. Consequently, children lose interest quickly and flit between activities. The childminder does not provide parents with a written summary of the required progress check for children aged between two and three years. Despite this, children play imaginatively and pretend to prepare and serve food. They practise physical skills as they throw balls into a basketball net.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Toys and resources are poorly organised and left in piles around the room. This makes it difficult for children to see what is available to them to use to support their play. Children's behaviour is not managed effectively. For example, the childminder does not help children to understand and manage their feelings appropriately when they become frustrated. Nevertheless, children enjoy playing board games with her and know how to take turns. They are provided with nutritious snacks and follow good handwashing routines. Children look forward to going on walks in the local community.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Poor-quality teaching and weak interactions mean that children do not make enough progress in their learning and development. Despite this, children are developing some key skills in readiness for school. For example, children engage in purposeful conversation and often ask questions to increase their knowledge. They count in sequence and are developing some mathematical skills.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY366290 Local authority Leeds Inspection number 1065091 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 3 - 11 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 1
p.5
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2007 and lives in Garforth, Leeds. She operates all year round, from 7am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays.
p.5
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion