Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Thomas Hinderwell Primary Academy
Summary
Kirsty Godfrey (lead), Angela Harper, Lynn Kenworthy
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Sept 2017
- Inspectors verified
Angela Harper, Kirsty Godfrey, Lynn Kenworthy
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
YO12 4HF
- Name on report verified
Thomas Hinderwell Primary Academy
- URN verified
140018
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Rapidly improve attendance and reduce persistent absence for pupils overall, and particularly for those who are disadvantaged or have special educational needs and/or disabilities. p.2
- Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management, including governance, by making sure that: – self-evaluation pinpoints strengths and weaknesses precisely so that improvement p.2
- Considerable staff changes have been a barrier to improvement. p.3
- Teaching has not improved quickly enough throughout the school to ensure that pupils achieve well by the end of key stages 1 and 2. p.3
- Leaders’ self-evaluation is not always precise enough. p.3
- This means that identified school improvement actions are not always specific or ambitious enough. p.3
- Leaders at all levels do not sufficiently evaluate the impact of their actions and report this routinely to senior leaders and governors. p.3
- Therefore, they are not held rigorously to account for improving outcomes for pupils. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,858
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Thomas Hinderwell Primary Academy Seamer Road, Scarborough, North Yorkshire YO12 4HF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
While phonics and early years outcomes have improved, achievement in reading, writing and mathematics is still below the national average at the end of key stages 1 and 2. Leaders have not established effective enough systems for evaluating, planning and reporting on the impact of school improvement actions. Governors have not held leaders sufficiently to account for improving pupils’ outcomes. Consequently, some improvements have not been fast enough. Leaders are not clear enough about the progress of different groups of pupils. Therefore, pupils’ needs are not always addressed sufficiently. Leaders have introduced new approaches to the teaching of English and mathematics. Some are so new that it is too early to see how effectively they are improving pupils’ progress. Teachers, especially in key stage 1, do not always plan work which is well matched to pupils’ starting points. Sometimes, adults do not intervene quickly enough to correct pupils’
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
mistakes. This slows the pace of their progress. Attendance remains well below national figures overall and for pupils who are disadvantaged or have special educational needs and/or disabilities.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders have made sure that children have a solid start to their education in the early years. Children are now making good progress, from often low starting points, and an increasing proportion reach a good level of development. The teaching of phonics has improved. By the end of Years 1 and 2, the proportion of pupils who meet the standard is now close to the national average. The principal is developing a strong culture of teamwork and development among the staff. Middle leaders are becoming more effective in improving the quality of teaching in their areas of responsibility. The curriculum is well designed. A broad range of learning opportunities across the wider curriculum, beyond English and mathematics, support pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils generally have positive attitudes to learning. They cooperate well with each other and behave well in lessons and around school.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that teaching, learning and assessment are consistently good or better, so that the proportion of pupils who meet and exceed the expected standards by the end of key stages 1 and 2 are at least average, by making sure that: – new teaching approaches become embedded and are used effectively throughout key stages 1 and 2 – teachers and other adults support pupils to quickly develop accurate letter and number formation, routinely checking that pupils correct mistakes – teachers use assessment information to plan tasks which are appropriately matched to pupils’ stages of development. Rapidly improve attendance and reduce persistent absence for pupils overall, and particularly for those who are disadvantaged or have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management, including governance, by making sure that: – self-evaluation pinpoints strengths and weaknesses precisely so that improvement
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
actions are appropriately targeted – ambitious targets are set and clear measures of success are identified to help gauge the impact of school improvement actions – leaders routinely evaluate and analyse the impact of their actions and report this consistently to senior leaders and governors – analysis of assessment information is refined to give greater clarity about the progress made by groups of pupils throughout the school – governors hold school leaders more rigorously to account for pupils’ outcomes.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Considerable staff changes have been a barrier to improvement. Teaching has not improved quickly enough throughout the school to ensure that pupils achieve well by the end of key stages 1 and 2. Leaders’ self-evaluation is not always precise enough. This means that identified school improvement actions are not always specific or ambitious enough. Leaders at all levels do not sufficiently evaluate the impact of their actions and report this routinely to senior leaders and governors. Therefore, they are not held rigorously to account for improving outcomes for pupils. Leaders have developed links with parents and raised awareness of the importance of good attendance. However, while parental engagement has improved, attendance figures remain very low. Leaders do not provide enough detail when reporting attendance and persistent absence to governors. This means that leaders are unable to demonstrate the impact of actions to improve attendance for groups of pupils.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Therefore, improvements have been limited. The use of pupil premium to support disadvantaged pupils has had mixed success. Leaders use it particularly well to assist pupils’ social and emotional development and readiness to learn. However, leaders’ analysis of the progress this group makes is not sharp enough to check the difference different strategies are making. Therefore, leaders are not able to determine how to most effectively target the funding. The new special educational needs coordinator has taken steps to make sure that funding provides individualised support so that pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities can achieve well. However, systems and processes are only in the early stages of their development, and the quality of provision for current pupils varies throughout school. As a result of leaders’ actions, the teaching of phonics is more effective and is resulting
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
in improved outcomes. Children are also making much better progress in the early years so that an increasing proportion are now reaching a good level of development by the end of Reception. Middle leaders, most of whom are new to their role in the last year, are successfully starting to bring about improvements to the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Leaders have continued to improve pupils’ behaviour. A whole-school behaviour system, raised staff expectations and effective management of incidents have resulted in considerable reductions in the severity and number of occurrences, including exclusions. Leaders make effective use of the links within the multi-academy trust and local schools. For example, by working with others, they have made sure that teachers’ assessments are more reliable and accurate. Support to develop the early years has also been successful. Staff have received effective training and development
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
opportunities which have contributed to the improvements seen in the quality of teaching and learning in phonics. The principal has a clear vision for the curriculum and has designed it to meet the needs of the pupils and the school’s context. It ensures a strong contribution to pupils’ good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. A culture of respect for others permeates the school and helps to prepare pupils well for life in modern Britain. The curriculum offers a broad range of experiences through themes and topics which give pupils opportunities to question, reason and work practically across a range of subjects. Leaders have a passionate belief in providing a wide range of extra-curricular opportunities, including lunchtime clubs which contribute to pupils’ personal development. Leaders use the primary school physical education (PE) and sport funding to offer a range of sporting equipment and activities. This is helping pupils to understand the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
importance of developing a healthy lifestyle.
p.4
Governance of the school
Governors and trustees have not made sure that leaders’ self-evaluation is precise enough to accurately identify appropriate actions to quickly secure the required improvements. This results in governors sometimes having an overly optimistic view of the impact of leaders’ actions. Additionally, governors do not always receive sufficient analysis of information from school leaders, for example about the progress of current pupils in all year groups or attendance outcomes overall and for different pupil groups. This hinders governors in holding leaders rigorously to account for pupils’ outcomes. Checks by the trust have not identified a lack of sharpness in self-evaluation, improvement planning and reporting mechanisms. However, recent changes to structures and systems within the trust are beginning to provide more appropriate support and challenge to governors and leaders.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have created a positive culture and ethos in which safeguarding plays an important part of everyday life. Appropriate checks are made on staff who work at the school, and trust staff check this on a regular basis. Leaders make sure that all staff receive regular and suitable training about all aspects of safeguarding, which means they know how to spot possible signs of concern. Leaders and governors are committed to keeping pupils safe. There is a close and effective working relationship with other agencies to support this. The principal now provides governors with a safeguarding report about the overview of support for vulnerable pupils. This allows governors to check the effectiveness of safeguarding provision.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is variable. Although improving, it is not yet securely good apart from in the early years. Consequently, not enough pupils reach or exceed the expected standards by the end of key stages 1 and 2. Changes in staffing have hindered development. Some teachers, particularly in key stage 1, do not take into account what pupils know and can do to help them plan suitable learning in lessons. This means that pupils, including those who are disadvantaged or have special educational needs and/or disabilities, do not quickly catch up or make fast enough progress in their learning. Where teachers do not notice pupils’ errors quickly, pupils do not make rapid enough gains with their learning. For example, pupils’ letter and number formation is not always accurate in key stage 1. When teachers do not pick this up, pupils continue incorrectly and do not quickly develop their handwriting skills. This often becomes a
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
barrier to their learning. There are several new teaching approaches to teaching aspects of English and mathematics. As teachers are at varying stages of confidence with these, the approaches are not always effective in maximising pupils’ learning. This is particularly the case with mathematics in key stage 1. A well-structured approach to the teaching of phonics helps pupils to develop the skills of blending sounds to read words. A new approach to the teaching of reading is broadening pupils’ reading skills. Teachers are also using displays in classrooms to effectively inspire pupils to read a wide range of quality texts. Positive relationships between staff and pupils create a constructive atmosphere in lessons. Teachers have high expectations of pupils’ learning behaviour. As a result, pupils are developing the resilience needed to overcome mistakes when they are learning something new. Teachers encourage pupils to discuss their ideas to help
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
clarify their thinking and involve pupils in checking their learning. Pupils in key stage 2 know how to improve their work and are taking greater responsibility for their own learning and development. Teaching across the curriculum helps pupils to make meaningful links with their learning in different subjects.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. There is a strong commitment by school leaders to develop pupils as rounded individuals. Consequently, pupils’ physical and emotional well-being is well supported. Pupils feel valued and are becoming confident and self-assured learners. The well-planned curriculum is successful in developing pupils’ awareness of diversity and the importance of tolerance and respect. There are positive relationships between staff and pupils which contribute well to pupils’ personal development. Pupils say that incidents of bullying are rare and that they know how to respond should such an issue arise. The curriculum also assists pupils in learning how to keep themselves safe, for example when online. Consequently, they are able to talk with confidence about the risks that come from using social media and how to avoid the dangers associated with online bullying.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s breakfast club supports pupils’ social interaction and provides a positive start to the day for the pupils who attend.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Leaders’ whole-school approaches to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence are not having a strong enough effect. Consequently, attendance remains well below average overall and for pupils who are disadvantaged or have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Persistent absence is reducing but not rapidly enough to improve attendance overall. Pupils move around school in a calm and orderly manner. Pupils are polite and well mannered to staff, visitors and each other. Their attitudes to learning are generally positive and they usually behave well in lessons and enjoy their learning. Records of behaviour incidents are checked carefully, and leaders identify when any additional support is required for individuals. Support for pupils’ with social and emotional needs is effective in developing pupils’ ability to regulate their own emotions
p.6
Behaviour
and be more ready to learn. Consequently, the frequency and length of exclusions has reduced.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Current pupils are not making consistently strong progress in reading, writing and mathematics in key stages 1 and 2. Teachers do not always plan tasks which are well matched to pupils’ learning needs, and this prevents pupils from catching up rapidly and limits the progress they make. In 2016 at the end of key stage 1, pupils’ attainment was below the national average in reading, writing and mathematics. Indications from the 2017 key stage 1 provisional data suggest that this trend will continue. By the end of key stage 2 in 2016, pupils’ attainment was also below national figures in reading, writing and mathematics. However, provisional data for 2017 shows that an increasing proportion of pupils exceeded the expected standards. In 2016, progress in key stage 2 was significantly below the national average in reading, writing and mathematics. It improved in 2017, due to improving teaching, but not considerably.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
The recently introduced reading approach is beginning to entice pupils to take a greater interest in reading, to read more widely and to read more regularly at home. It is not yet possible to see how effective the new approach is in improving pupils’ reading skills. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities have individual support plans which identify appropriate targets to support pupils’ development of a wide range of skills. Their support varies throughout school, however, with some pupils not making fast enough progress. The school’s use of the pupil premium funding to target and support the achievement of disadvantaged pupils requires improvement in order to achieve greater consistency across classes. Too many pupils have not learned how to accurately form letters and numbers during key stage 1. This slows pupils down and is often a barrier to pupils’ success. The proportion of pupils who meet the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
screening check has increased over the last three years. By 2017, the figure was very close to the national average. All of the Year 1 pupils in 2017 who were eligible for pupil premium funding met the phonics standard. Younger pupils in the early years and key stage one are increasingly using their phonics skills to read with confidence. Pupils usually take pride and care in the presentation of their work. Displays around the school show examples of good-quality work from across the curriculum.
p.7
Early years provision Good
Leaders have prioritised improvement strategies in the early years so that children make a good start to their education. As a result, the proportion of children reaching a good level of development has increased since the last inspection and was above the national average in 2016. Children start their learning in the early years with skills and understanding which are often lower than those found typically for children of their age. This is particularly the case for children’s communication and language skills. Therefore, leaders have prioritised children’s early reading and writing development. Additional funding is used effectively to provide the specific support some children need. Teachers’ stronger subject knowledge and consistency in the teaching of phonics are resulting in a greater proportion of children meeting the early learning goals in reading and writing. The early years lead teacher, with the support of the vice-principal and a specialist
p.7
Early years provision Good
leader of education from the trust, has ensured that there is an accurate assessment of children’s skills and understanding on entry to school. Effective systems are also in place to capture observations of children’s learning, record children’s progress and identify their next steps for development. These processes are supporting teachers to build on children’s learning from Nursery into Reception and increase the pace of progress made. Adults provide a variety of activities to stimulate children’s learning, both indoors and outside. As a result, children make keen use of all the areas, sustaining concentration well and developing their independence. Staff reinforce important vocabulary effectively and model how to share and play, resulting in high levels of engagement and positive behaviour. The early years lead teacher, along with the early years staff team, ensures that the statutory welfare requirements are met.
p.7
Early years provision Good
Parents who spoke to inspectors said that staff deal well with any concerns they have and said that their children are happy and settled at school. Leaders are aware that the outdoor area does not offer the same high quality of opportunities for children to develop their reading, writing and mathematical skills as the indoor environment does. Too many children have not learned how to form numbers and letters accurately by the time they leave Reception. This is often a barrier to their learning in key stage 1.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Email address office@thomashinderwell.co.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 7–8 July 2015
p.9
Information about this school
The school is part of the David Ross Education Trust. Since the previous inspection, there have been considerable changes to the school’s staffing. Most of the teachers are new and the vice-principal and key stage leaders are also new to their roles. The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish. The school also meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school is an average-sized primary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils supported by the pupil premium is above average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is much smaller than that found typically, as is the proportion who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is just above the national average. The proportion who have a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care plan is broadly average.
p.9
Information about this school
The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6. The school runs a breakfast club.
p.10
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed teaching in every class. Most observations were undertaken jointly with senior leaders. Inspectors listened to pupils read. They talked to pupils about their school and evaluated the quality of work in a sample of pupils’ books. Inspectors held meetings with the principal, vice-principal, key stage leaders and the early years lead teacher. They also met with two representatives from the academy improvement board and an academy improvement partner from the trust. The inspectors looked at pupils’ work in books along with the school’s information on pupil’s achievement to ascertain the progress that pupils are making. A range of documentation was considered, including the school’s self-evaluation, records of the monitoring of teaching and learning, the school improvement plan, information relating to the attendance and behaviour of pupils, safeguarding and child protection records, and minutes from governing body meetings. Documents outlining
p.11
Information about this inspection
the arrangements for the use of pupil premium funding and the primary school PE and sport funding were also considered. Inspectors spoke to parents informally in order to seek their views about the school. Twenty responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, were taken into account. Nineteen responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for staff were also considered.
p.11
Inspection team
Kirsty Godfrey, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Lynn Kenworthy Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion