Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Barnabas Church of England VC Primary School

Inspected 20 Sept 2017 · published 17 Oct 2017 · URN 109144

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Kathy Maddocks (lead), James Hood, Jen Edwards

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Sept 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    James Hood, Jen Edwards, Kathy Maddocks

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BS6 5LQ

  • Name on report verified

    St Barnabas Church of England VC Primary School

  • URN verified

    109144

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronggood progresssuccessfuleffectivelyeffectivestrengthsenjoypolite
Criticismrequires improvementpoorlackweaknessesfailedtoo manynot effectivelybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings574w−5
  • Leadership131w−51
  • Safeguarding99w+73
  • What needs to improve1361w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,083
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 20%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 48%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

St Barnabas Church of England VC Primary School Albany Road, Montpelier, Bristol, Bristol BS6 5LQ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Governors have not held leaders to account. Consequently, results in the end-of-year tests at key stage 2 were below the national average for 2016 and 2017.  Governors have not planned strategically and sought resolutions to the difficulties of the past two years.  The progress of pupils in Year 6 in 2017 was in the lowest 25% nationally for reading, writing and mathematics.  Teaching is not planned to meet the different needs of pupils in both key stage 1 and key stage 2 classes.  The most able pupils are not achieving test results at the high standard. There is not enough challenge for them in their learning.  The attendance of a minority of pupils in each key stage has remained stubbornly low.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The acting headteacher has made an impact on improvements in her first two weeks. She has a clear knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of the school.  Children in the early years foundation stage are making good progress.  Disadvantaged pupils are making progress that is in line with other pupils nationally.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are provided with support that enhances their progress.  The strong spiritual, moral, social and cultural influences of the school weave through the learning well.  Pupils are safe. Staff are vigilant in their safeguarding practices.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Governors should ensure that: – standards continue to rise by planning improvements in teaching with a focus on learning – leaders are held to account so that standards improve rapidly.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, by teachers: – having the highest expectations of what pupils can achieve, particularly the most able – planning for the different ability levels of pupils.  Maintain the focus on attendance so that more pupils attend on a regular basis. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Governors have not led strategically. They have accepted excuses for poor results without challenge.  Training given to teachers has not had an impact on improving the results of pupils in the end-of-key-stage-2 tests. The training was not evaluated effectively. It has not improved teaching for middle-ability pupils and the most able pupils.  The performance management of staff is not monitored by some leaders. This happens because senior leaders and governors are not checking these processes.  The acting headteacher is focusing on the most critical aspects of improvement. Before, there were six plans which led to confusion and a lack of prioritisation.  The curriculum provides an appropriate range of subjects for pupils to experience. Pupils enjoy the activities within the curriculum. Pupils celebrate the festival of Eid as well as Christmas. Pupils comment on their enjoyment and appreciation of learning

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

about each other. The curriculum focus on the city of Bristol and its history has added to the sense of community. Local artists, poets and caterers have taught pupils, and sometimes parents, the skills of their trades.  Extra-curricular activities are cultural and sports orientated. Pupils enjoy these activities, are successful in them and gain confidence as a result.  Christian values permeate the spiritual, cultural, social and moral values. Pupils experience Christian and British values in assemblies and themed activities. They understand and exhibit tolerance and respect for each other.  Leaders spend the pupil premium funding wisely. Additional staff manage disadvantaged pupils’ complex needs. Pupils are progressing as well as other pupils nationally. They attend trips and camps with their peers.  The physical education and sport premium funding supports pupils going to competitive sports events. Teachers have learned gymnastics coaching.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are making good progress. Leaders spend the funding for them effectively. Parents of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities praised the work of the special educational needs staff. Pupils are happy and achieving well as a result of the support offered.  A part-time speech therapist works with pupils who have speech and communication needs. A learning mentor works full time with families. As a result, pupils learn well and parents support their children’s education at home.  The early years foundation stage is successful as children develop as individuals. The leader and class teacher manage children’s needs according to their ability and progress. Staff encourage routines and use language and communication of a high standard. Children are resilient, polite and ready for the next stage of their education at the end of Reception.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Governance has not been effective in improving teaching, which has led to the poor results in the end-of-year tests in key stage 2.  Governors support but do not challenge. Minutes of governance meetings show that pertinent questions are asked but governors accept the reasons proffered without seeking a resolution to any problems.  Leaders have failed to present information in an understandable way. Governors focused on understanding information instead of interrogating it. There has been too little urgency, so improvements have not materialised. It is recommended that a review of governance takes place to help speed up the process of school improvement.  The achievement of targets set for managing the performance of staff are not checked.  Governors manage funds for pupil premium and special educational needs effectively.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Governors and leaders ensure that safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that records are of a high quality and detailed. Staff are trained well on how to keep pupils safe from abuse, sexual exploitation, and the influence of radicalisation and extremism. A team of staff meets weekly to ensure that pupils with complex needs are safe and secure in school. The team works determinedly, yet sensitively, with pupils, parents and external agencies to monitor and support the most vulnerable pupils. Safeguarding arrangements are secure and part of the school’s culture.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teachers are not planning effectively. Pupils are given the same tasks regardless of ability. The extension activities for the most able pupils are not provided consistently. Pupils are not reviewing their work or learning from their mistakes. They are not showing resilience within their learning. They are over reliant on teachers to provide information.  Too many pupils in key stage 2 are not correcting basic mistakes in their writing, such as the placement of capital letters and full stops. Pupils’ lack of understanding means that they do not have the skills and knowledge necessary to use more sophisticated punctuation and grammar correctly.  Teachers focus on the current learning goal when praising pupils. They ignore other errors. Pupils feel successful even though their work is imperfect.  Teaching assistants are skilful and work well with individuals and small groups of pupils. Disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils, benefit from this

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

support.  Pupils do homework on basic skills, such as spelling and reading. The strong work with families supports pupils in this.  Children in the Reception class and pupils in Year 1 progress rapidly. Phonics (letters and the sounds they represent) is taught effectively and this improves children’s reading and writing.  End-of-year reports for each year group provide parents with accurate information about how their children are progressing. The reports explain the next steps in learning.  Stereotyping does not occur in school. The curriculum encourages inclusive practices that pupils accept.

p.4

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils are confident when engaging with adults. They speak sensitively and articulately on a range of topics.  Pupils are proud of their own culture and religion. They are receptive to the practices of others in the community.  Pupils understand bullying in its various guises. They are clear about what steps they need to take, as and when it happens. They spoke of the school’s efficient systems for dealing with these rare occurrences.  Pupils feel safe in school. They know how to use the internet safely.  Pupils, staff and parents expressed no concerns about pupils’ safety at school.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils wear their uniform with pride.  Pupils show respect for each other. They listen attentively in class and assemblies.  The school has a comprehensive behaviour policy. Pupils understand it well. Younger pupils spoke enthusiastically about the golden parties that take place. These happen when pupils receive a sufficient amount of golden rewards.  Pupils conduct themselves in an orderly way around the school throughout the day.  Pupils’ good behaviour is not yet adding to their progress in lessons. Pupils’ attitudes to learning are good. They bring an eagerness and commitment to their learning which is not fully utilised by teachers.  Attendance is not in line with the national average. Leaders know the case studies of pupils not attending. They are working with families to explain the importance of education and the devastating impact that non-attendance has on pupils’ progress.

p.5

Behaviour

Leaders take a firm stance on pupils’ attendance.  There are too few pupils in alternative provision to comment on their progress and attendance.

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 In the end-of-year tests at key stage 1, pupils are achieving in line with the national average. The potential of pupils is not developed in key stage 2. Pupils’ progress in the end-of-year tests at key stage 2 was below the national average in 2016 and then dipped further in 2017.  The most able pupils are not making strong progress in English and mathematics because the activities set are limiting their achievement. They are not achieving a high standard in the end-of-year tests at key stages 1 and 2.  Teachers had an overgenerous view of achievement. They accepted levels of progress and improvement that were not high enough as being evidence of good learning. The acting headteacher is aware of this and changing systems accordingly.  The most able pupils show effective learning when starting the foundation subjects. Teachers are not building on this prior learning, so progress stalls.  Too many pupils are not prepared sufficiently for learning in secondary schools in

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

foundation subjects as a result.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are working well, dependent on their starting points. Staff are aware of these pupils’ needs. Skilful teaching assistants provide support which ensures that progress is sustained.  Disadvantaged pupils, including the most able, are achieving in line with other pupils nationally at key stages 1 and 2.  Pupils read well in the school. The library is well-resourced and used for class reading as well as social times. Parents of pupils in key stage 1 come into school for the first 15 minutes of the day to sit and read with their children. This practice is popular. For those pupils whose parents cannot make this time, teachers and teaching assistants hear them read. Hence, all pupils in key stage 1 read every day. Pupils in key stage 2 are reading challenging fiction and non-fiction. This enhances their vocabulary as well as

p.6

Early years provision Good

 The leader of early years is experienced and capable.  Most children come into school with skills and knowledge below national expectations. Children in the early years make good progress. Children are well prepared for Year 1, as shown by their achievement in the early learning goals in 2017.  Teaching in the Reception class is effective because it focuses on the individual needs of children.  Current children are settling well in Reception class. The routines ensure that children respect the equipment used. Children are polite to each other and to staff. They are enthusiastic about the new experiences.  Children’s keen involvement in the physical activities shows that they feel safe.  Children’s personal and social development is strong because staff know the children well. Transition arrangements are thorough and involve visits to nurseries and the children’s homes. Parents are involved in the initial assessment of children’s abilities.

p.6

Early years provision Good

This provides a stable start in identifying strengths and needs.  Children learn to share and take turns.  Children with speech, language and communication difficulties are supported well and make strong progress.  The most able children are not making accelerated progress and exceeding in a good level of development.  Staff have created a learning environment that engages children. However, the threads for literacy and numeracy are not used advantageously enough in the outdoor learning areas. Children are not able to flow freely from inside to the outside area and follow a themed activity.  The leader ensures that children are safe and free from harm.

p.7

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Email address stbarnabasp@bristol.gov.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 29–30 January 2013

p.8

Information about this school

 The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about assessment data for 2017 on its website.  St Barnabas Church of England VC Primary School is smaller than the average primary school.  The acting headteacher was appointed in September 2017.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is below the national average but the proportion of pupils who have education, health and care plans is above.  The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium funding is much higher than the national average.  The school met the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Year 6, in 2016.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited lessons jointly with senior leaders.  A wide sample of pupils’ work, from all year groups and a range of subjects, was scrutinised.  Inspectors talked with pupils from key stages 1 and 2, as well as with pupils informally across the site.  Meetings were held with the headteacher, middle leaders and members of the governing body. The lead inspector met the senior school improvement officer for the local authority.  Information and other documentary evidence were evaluated, including that relating to safeguarding, assessment, school evaluation and external reviews.  The lead inspector took account of the 10 responses to and seven comments on the online Parent View survey and the 15 responses to the staff online survey.

p.10

Inspection team

Kathy Maddocks, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

James Hood Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion