Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder EY245916

Inspected 27 Sept 2017 · URN EY245916

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Lindsay Dobson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Sept 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Lindsay Dobson

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY245916

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−59Criticalmore positive than 27% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyhigh-qualitysecure knowledgepositiveenjoyhappyconsistentprecise
Criticismpoorweaknessesnot effectiveineffectiveweaknessat risklacksconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings544w−70
  • Leadership104w−85
  • What needs to improve206w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
835
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 41%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 27 September 2017 26 October 2012

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder has a poor knowledge of the Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) reporting procedures and the possible signs and symptoms of abuse.  The childminder lacks a clear understanding of wider safeguarding issues, including awareness of the 'Prevent' duty and the use of mobile phones and cameras. She also does not record children's attendance accurately.  Assessments of children's progress are not accurate. The childminder does not use any information she gathers about their interests and skills, to plan activities that are tailored to their individual needs.  The childminder does not support children through positive interactions that promote their engagement and motivate them to learn.  Partnerships with parents do not promote a shared approach to children's learning.  The childminder does not implement effective arrangements to evaluate her provision and identify areas that require improvement.

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not access professional development opportunities to improve her knowledge and skills. The quality of teaching is poor.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder provides children with healthy meals and snacks, and daily opportunities for fresh air and exercise as they play outdoors in her garden.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 gain a secure knowledge and understanding of the up-to-date procedures for reporting concerns of abuse and neglect to the relevant agencies, in line with the LSCB 11/10/2017

p.2

Due Date

 improve knowledge of wider safeguarding issues, with particular regard to the 'Prevent' duty guidance and appropriate use of mobile phones and cameras 11/10/2017

p.2

Due Date

 maintain a daily record of the hours of children's attendance 11/10/2017  ensure assessments of children's learning and development are consistent and precise from the outset to obtain an accurate understanding of each child's level of achievement, interests and learning styles and use the information to shape learning experiences that are tailored to meet the individual needs of each child 11/10/2017

p.2

Due Date

 guide children's development through positive interactions that promote their engagement and stimulate them to learn 11/10/2017

p.2

Due Date

 improve partnerships with parents so they are effectively involved, and informed about their child's learning and development. 11/10/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 develop systems for self-evaluation that identify areas for improvement  undertake appropriate training and professional development to ensure children receive high-quality learning and development experiences.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder.  The inspector held a number of discussions with the childminder. She looked at available documentation and discussed the suitability of persons living in the household.  The inspector spoke to the children during the inspection.  The inspector took account of the views of parents through written feedback provided.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder has a poor knowledge of the LSCB procedures and the steps to take to protect children from harm. She does not demonstrate a good understanding of the possible signs and symptoms of abuse. The childminder is also not up to date with wider child protection issues. The childminder does not accurately record children's attendance, as required. These weaknesses compromise children's welfare. The childminder does not have effective systems in place to identify weaknesses in her practice and has no plans to enhance her professional development. Children are not provided with quality learning and development experiences that raise their outcomes.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

Assessments of children's development are not accurate. Planning for children is not focused on their individual learning needs. Consequently, they are not supported to make good progress. For example, the childminder provides activities with no purposeful learning and she does not take into account children's different skills and abilities. Furthermore, children do not benefit from high-quality interactions with the childminder. This results in children who are unmotivated to learn and not challenged, and are not engaged in the play opportunities available to them. Partnerships with parents are still not fully effective and do not promote a complementary approach to children's learning, this was also raised as a weakness at the last inspection. The childminder does not provide parents with ideas about how they can continue their child's learning at home. Additionally, she does not gather information from parents about what their children know

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

and can do. Despite poor adult interaction, children enjoy exploring some of the toys available. They move from one resource to another and play with some imagination, for example, when they are in the playhouse in the garden.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The weaknesses in leadership and management place children's safety and welfare at risk. Nonetheless, children appear happy and settled and have formed appropriate bonds with the childminder. Children have daily opportunities to be physically active and play outdoors in the fresh air. They are learning to manage their own personal hygiene, such as handwashing, and they sit together to eat healthy meals and snacks. Children have opportunities to develop their social skills and build friendships in a wider social group, during visits to singing sessions and to the local park. Children are encouraged to use manners and they are reminded to share and take turns with the toys.

p.4

Outcomes for children are inadequate

The childminder does not guide or support children's learning effectively. Consequently, children do not make enough progress in their learning. They are not developing the necessary skills for the next stage in their development and the eventual move on to school. However, children do experience some opportunities to develop their independence. For example, they have opportunities to select some resources themselves.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY245916 Local authority Doncaster Inspection number 1059639 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4

p.5

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 26 October 2012

p.5

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2002 and lives in Thorne, on the outskirts of Doncaster. She operates all year round from 7.30am until 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, except bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 3.

p.5

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.5

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.6

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion