Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Ropley CofE Primary School

Inspected 27 Sept 2017 · published 16 Oct 2017 · URN 116312

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 Sept 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Daniel Lambert

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SO24 0DS

  • Name on report verified

    Ropley Church of England Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 7% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedenjoystronghigh qualitystrong relationshipseffectivesupportivepolite
Criticismweaknessespoorweaknessconcernsnot consistentlyharmlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1081w+21
  • What needs to improve78w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,151
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Clare Molyneux Headteacher Ropley Church of England Primary School Church Street Ropley Alresford Hampshire SO24 0DS

p.1

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 27 September 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. In this small school, you, together with staff and governors, have adapted well to the changes to the primary curriculum and assessments introduced in 2014. You have been focused sharply on raising standards in the school. For instance, in 2015, you identified weaknesses in the quality of teaching. Your swift and effective action to eradicate poor teaching and to help pupils to catch up has improved the rates of progress across the school. As a result, pupils’ attainment has risen, particularly in reading and writing.

p.1

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

Your assessment of the schools’ effectiveness is accurate. Leaders and governors use an appropriate range of methods to find out how well the school is performing and, when necessary, deploy resources exactly where they are needed. For example, when a dip in writing standards was identified last year, senior leaders delivered additional classes in key stage 2 to help pupils to make accelerated progress. Governors know the school well because they work closely with staff and maintain a watchful eye on pupils’ performance. Governors are supportive and, vitally, challenge leaders to improve outcomes for pupils further.

p.1

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

Pupils are polite, well mannered and smart. They work hard in class and enjoy learning. The range of clubs and sporting activities is impressive, and parents and pupils value the effort that goes into running these. Pupils reported that behaviour is good across the school and that, when problems do occur, teachers deal with them well. The curriculum is broad and interesting. Pupils enjoy the range of trips and visitors to their school and use these experiences to gather first-hand information about their topics. For example, Year 4 pupils visited the Watercress Line and wrote interesting and articulate recounts of their day. Computing is a particular strength. Pupils learn to write basic commands to control robots or characters on screen. Pupils use their understanding of spelling, grammar and punctuation well and standards of writing in all subjects are high. You, rightly, recognise that the strong progress in writing needs to be accelerated so that a

p.1

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

greater proportion of pupils write at a high standard by the end of key stage 2.

p.2

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

At the time of the last inspection, you were charged with improving systems for checking and evaluating the impact of school improvements. You have, wisely, worked with external advisers from the local authority to gain greater insight into the performance of the school. Plans now incorporate clear actions and appropriate timings, and state which staff are responsible for their completion. Analysis of the plans shows that leaders measure the impact of their work and appropriately change their plans when they do not have the desired impact. As a result, the pace of improvement across the school has increased.

p.2

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that records are detailed and of high quality. Checks on staff are completed before employment commences and recorded methodically. Leaders and governors check that these are in place. Recently, governors attended useful safeguarding training provided by the Diocese of Winchester. Checks on the school have a sharp focus on protecting children.

p.2

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

Staff are well trained in safeguarding and know how to identify concerns when they arise. Leaders foster strong relationships with parents and use their links with outside agencies to garner additional support when needed.

p.2

Short inspection of Ropley Church of England Primary School

Pupils learn about personal safety and risk management. For example, Year 1 works with the local fire and rescue service to learn how to prevent fires and what to do if they find one. Pupils join leaders on the monthly health and safety inspection to identify and minimise risks in school. As a result, pupils are well placed to keep themselves safe from harm.

p.2

Inspection findings

 At the start of the inspection, we agreed to look at the effectiveness of safeguarding; the progress of disadvantaged pupils in key stage 2; the quality of teaching, learning and assessment of writing; how effectively governors and leaders monitor standards; and the level of challenge for pupils, including the most able.  In 2016, disadvantaged pupils in Year 6 made better progress than others nationally in reading and mathematics. Leaders and teachers accurately identify the needs of disadvantaged pupils and use sharply focused interventions and support to help these pupils in class. Governors check the progress of disadvantaged pupils in fine detail and deploy additional resources when required to help them catch up. As a result, the progress of disadvantaged pupils across the school has accelerated.  In the last two academic years, pupils’ attainment in writing has been lower than their attainment in reading and mathematics in both key stage 1 and 2. Last

p.2

Inspection findings

year, leaders and teachers identified weaknesses in pupils’ understanding of spelling, grammar and punctuation and provided additional teaching to address this. The vast majority of pupils across the school now write at the level appropriate for their age. Pupils write sophisticated and interesting texts in a wide range of subjects. Consequently, progress in writing across the school has improved rapidly.  Leaders check the quality of teaching regularly and provide staff with incisive feedback to help them improve. Governors work with leaders to scrutinise pupils’ work and assessment information to identify any areas of weakness. Leaders at all levels are skilled and contribute to the development, delivery and evaluation of school improvement plans. As a result, weaknesses are recognised and rectified swiftly.  Typically, a high proportion of pupils, including the most able, make expected progress in the school. Recently, leaders and teachers have raised expectations

p.3

Inspection findings

in lessons to successfully accelerate pupils’ progress. For example, Year 3 wrote interesting adventure stories, applying their understanding of paragraphs to group-related sentences and using inverted commas to identify direct speech. Nevertheless, in mathematics, pupils do not consistently complete work that challenges them to solve problems or to reason. As a result, a smaller proportion of pupils, including the most able, attain at a high standard in mathematics than their peers nationally.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 pupils routinely complete challenging tasks in mathematics  progress accelerates so that a greater proportion of pupils attain at a high standard in writing and mathematics.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the Director of Education for the Diocese of Winchester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I met with you, school leaders and three governors, including the chair of the governing body. I observed learning in four classes. I analysed a range of school documentation, including information about pupils’ achievement, the school improvement plan and safeguarding checks, policies and procedures. We discussed your own evaluation of the school’s effectiveness. I considered the 45 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and spoke to parents at the beginning of the day. Some parents offered written responses, which I also considered. I met with pupils from Years 3 to 6 and gathered the views of other pupils throughout the day.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion