Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Minehead Middle School

Inspected 12 Sept 2017 · published 16 Oct 2017 · URN 136774

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Sept 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ann Cox

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    TA24 5RH

  • Name on report verified

    Minehead Middle School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationshappyextremelystrongmake good progressstrong relationshipsrespectfulpolite
Criticismshortcomingsdeclinednot strongdecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings708w+61
  • What needs to improve91w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
792
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 50
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Daniel Hartley Headteacher Minehead Middle School Ponsford Road Minehead Somerset TA24 5RH

p.1

Short inspection of Minehead Middle School

Following my visit to the school on 12 September 2017 with Carol Hannaford, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Minehead Middle School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You and your senior leaders have high expectations of staff. They support you in your work well because they understand that you want the best for all pupils. Since taking up your appointment, you have worked tirelessly to develop the school’s effectiveness. Being part of the West Somerset Academy Trust has increased and enhanced the educational opportunities for pupils. You have collaborated and shared expertise with staff from other schools. Leaders are supported by highly committed governors.

p.1

Short inspection of Minehead Middle School

Pupils who spoke with inspectors are happy. They cooperate extremely well with teachers and each other. Leaders and staff have nurtured a welcoming, tolerant and respectful school culture. Pupils feel valued as individuals. Pupils are industrious and engaged in their work. They are courteous and polite.

p.1

Short inspection of Minehead Middle School

You have prioritised improving pupils’ progress in mathematics and French since the previous inspection. In addition, you have improved the assessment of pupils’ knowledge and skills. This information identifies any shortcomings. Support is targeted carefully so that barriers to progress are removed. The success of this work is apparent in the rapid development of pupils’ skills in mathematics.

p.1

Short inspection of Minehead Middle School

You and your leadership team have ensured a strong culture of keeping pupils safe. Adults are trained in how to keep pupils safe from abuse, sexual exploitation, and from the influence of radical or extreme views. Notices remind staff of the responsibilities adults have in safeguarding pupils. Record-keeping is thorough and secure.

p.1

Short inspection of Minehead Middle School

There are effective systems in place to protect vulnerable pupils. Safeguarding leaders from different schools in the trust work together with families. Timely referrals are made to agencies.

p.2

Short inspection of Minehead Middle School

Pupils report that they feel safe. They are prepared well to face risks in the modern world. Pupils feel confident to seek help from adults; they know who to speak to.

p.2

Short inspection of Minehead Middle School

The majority of parents agreed that their child is happy at school. They praised the caring work of teachers and other adults.

p.2

Inspection findings

 We considered the effectiveness of leaders’ actions to strengthen the progress of pupils in mathematics. You have invested in training to improve teachers’ mathematical knowledge and skills. Staff have worked effectively with teachers from successful schools, which has boosted their confidence. New schemes of learning have been introduced. Attention to the order in which topics are taught informs schemes of learning. Pupils acquire knowledge securely and make good progress.  Pupils enjoy mathematics. Teachers have high expectations. Strong relationships exist between teachers and pupils. The most able pupils are working with local universities and pupils’ aspirations are higher as a result.  There is a new leader of writing skills. Revised programmes of work and closer monitoring are helping to accelerate pupils’ progress. Teachers are more proficient at developing pupils’ writing. Most teachers are tenacious in encouraging pupils to

p.2

Inspection findings

produce the very best pieces of work. Evidence in pupils’ English books demonstrates this. Pupils are applying their writing skills in French successfully. Written work in humanities and science is not as strong. You know that this is an area for improvement.  You have evaluated writing outcomes in the end of year test at key stage 2 in 2017. There were shortfalls in pupils’ spelling skills. Teachers have modified the work and, as a result, pupils are now achieving well in spelling.  Finally, we looked at the school’s work to improve attendance. Attendance has declined in comparison to the national average. Trust leaders work with families who have children attending different schools across the trust. Also, they are involving external agencies in supporting the families. This has halted the decline in attendance rates. Leaders are aware that there is still a minority of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities who do not

p.2

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the attendance of pupils, including the disadvantaged and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, improves to at least the national average  pupils are given more opportunities to develop their writing skills in humanities and science.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of the multi academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wiltshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During this inspection, inspectors spoke to you, the chief executive of the West Somerset Academy Trust, and other senior teachers, including those with responsibility for safeguarding. I had a telephone conversation with the chair of governors. We visited lessons in mathematics and considered pupils’ writing. We looked at the quality of work in pupils’ books. Inspectors talked informally to pupils across the site and formally with pupils from every year group. I considered documentary evidence relating to the impact of the school’s work, including safeguarding and attendance. I scrutinised the school’s evaluation documents and the improvement plan. We took into account 38 responses to Parent View, the Ofsted online survey, and the comments written by parents.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion