Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Whitehall Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
26 Sept 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Paula Craigie
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
E4 6ES
- Name on report verified
Whitehall Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This will lead to stronger outcomes in reading and writing for all groups of pupils. p.3
- I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Waltham Forest. p.3
- This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,160
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
6 October 2017 Mrs Jacqui Holder Headteacher Whitehall Primary School Normanton Park London, E4 6ES
p.1
Short inspection of Whitehall Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 26 September 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2012.
p.1
Short inspection of Whitehall Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education since the school’s last inspection. You identified what the school needed to improve on and have worked hard to achieve this. Your senior and middle leaders are well equipped to continue this journey of improvement and are rightly encouraged by the initiatives they have already introduced that are having a positive impact.
p.1
Short inspection of Whitehall Primary School
Your governing body is committed to the school; they hold you to account and are highly supportive and well informed of the school’s current priorities. Governors have an accurate picture of how well pupils are doing through spending time in lessons and meeting with senior leaders. Parents are supportive, which is reflected in the online Ofsted questionnaire and through informal conversations with parents in the morning, when children are being dropped off.
p.1
Short inspection of Whitehall Primary School
Parents typically say that their children settle quickly into new classes, are happy and are doing well. When their children need additional help or support, the school is quick to recognise this and put interventions in place. They say that staff, including senior leaders, are approachable.
p.1
Short inspection of Whitehall Primary School
You know your school well and the needs of your pupils and community. You have invested time and resources into developing the outside area and playground so that it is welcoming for parents and also a practical and spacious learning environment. The outdoor provision for your youngest children is inviting and engaging and is beginning to focus on print and number in the environment, as well as promoting physical development.
p.1
Short inspection of Whitehall Primary School
Your pupils are a credit to you. They are keen to share new initiatives on how they help make Whitehall even better. They spoke confidently about a range of issues and feel they really make a difference in helping their peers eat more healthily and participate in sports and morning routines such as ‘wake up and shake up’, for example. Deaf children are well supported during lessons and engage well during playtime activities.
p.2
Short inspection of Whitehall Primary School
Safeguarding and keeping children safe is important at this school. A safeguarding culture extends to all staff, including the chair of the governing body. This is evident from the thorough record keeping and processes in place, to conversations with children about keeping safe online and how they have used this in real life experiences. Staff have received updated training and can show the impact this has had, such as a heightened awareness of risks such as extremism and female genital mutilation. Staff know how to report concerns; these systems are in place and staff know why this is important and respond to ongoing changes and developments as a matter of course. Children feel safe at Whitehall and this is confirmed, not only by parents, but also seen during the fire evacuation where children responded calmly and quickly. This included the new Nursery cohort, who were unfazed as they sat happily in a sheltered gazebo with their teachers and support staff.
p.2
Inspection findings
We agreed four key lines of enquiry as the focus of this inspection.
p.2
Inspection findings
The first line of enquiry was taken from the previous inspection report and focused on mathematics and opportunities to apply calculation skills to problems, practical activities and investigations. We also referred to the reading target, and pupils not making enough progress in developing wider reading skills. We observed a number of mathematics lessons together and agreed that the sessions are practical, carefully pitched at all levels and focus on ensuring a greater depth of understanding. This is also reflected in pupils’ books. In reading, a range of initiatives have been introduced to raise the profile of this important skill and these are beginning to have an impact. Parental involvement is increasing; pupils have access to high-quality resources; access to the library has increased, which pupils really value. The culture of reading still needs to be sustained in order to secure further improvement and has been identified as an additional target.
p.2
Inspection findings
The second line of enquiry took account of the curriculum and whether it is sufficiently broad and balanced to support good outcomes for all groups of pupils from the early years to Year 6. The school is continuing to focus on outcomes in English and mathematics, but has increased the provision for other curriculum areas as it rightly sees these as a priority. PE, computing, with specific reference to e-safety, and writing across the curriculum, such as through science, are key features in timetabling. Highly skilled phase leaders are carefully deployed during morning lessons to act as the third teacher in each year group. This approach is enabling teachers to plan tightly focused lessons that are more carefully matched to the needs of pupils who are progressing more rapidly as a result. The third key line of enquiry was around leadership and the current actions of school leaders to raise outcomes. It was evident when meeting your middle
p.2
Inspection findings
leaders that the commitment of leadership extends beyond the senior leadership team. Your middle leaders are committed to leading learning and raising the profile of their subject. This is infectious and subject leaders have confidently identified their priorities and know how this will help raise outcomes. They are firmly on this journey and current pupil progress shows an upward trend. Finally, we agreed to consider attendance and we discussed how the school is tackling absence and persistent absence for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEN and EHC/Statements. The school has identified a range of strategies to improve attendance for all pupils, such as reward systems, engaging with parents and through more formal routes, such as involving the welfare officer. This has met with some success; however, it is the rapid improvement of attendance for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and education health and
p.3
Inspection findings
care plans on which the school must be congratulated. The school has addressed the main issues and made changes, with governor support, and this has led to rapid improvement.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that they:
p.3
Next steps for the school
continue to recognise that certain groups, such as summer-born boys, perform less well in phonics and focus on strategies to overcome this. continue to develop the culture of reading so that this is sustained through the range of reading initiatives and interventions that are already showing positive signs. This will lead to stronger outcomes in reading and writing for all groups of pupils.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Waltham Forest. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection I held meetings with you, your deputy and assistant head, key stage phase leaders, middle leaders, the chair of governors and spoke to a representative from the local authority. I spoke briefly with parents as they dropped off their children in the morning and I took account of the responses to the online Ofsted questionnaire completed by 21 parents. I spoke informally with staff and children and analysed the three staff survey responses and 325 pupil responses to the online Ofsted questionnaire. Together, we observed teaching and learning both indoors and outside from Nursery to Year 6 and watched a small intervention activity led by the teacher of the deaf. I looked at samples of pupils’ English and mathematics books from Year 1 to Year 6, including pupils from the Deaf Unit and then observed them in their lessons. I also reviewed a wide range of documents including the school’s self-evaluation, and the single central record and other
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion