Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
21 Sept 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Phil Smith
- Postcode verified
S25 2QZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment14
“You and your deputy headteacher make for a strong team.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 894
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Amanda Bartholomew Headteacher Anston Park Junior School Park Avenue North Anston Sheffield South Yorkshire S25 2QZ
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 21 September 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2017. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its section 5 inspection before the one that took place in April 2017, the school was also judged to require improvement.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become a good school.
p.1
School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
make sure that improvement plans have clear timescales for when actions will happen and show how the actions will improve pupils’ progress develop the role of subject coordinators so they play a full and active role in improving the quality of teaching and learning ensure that all pupils, including the most able and pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, are challenged across the wider curriculum.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with you, the deputy headteacher and three subject coordinators. Together, you and I undertook a tour of the school, visited classrooms and sampled pupils’ current work. I met with six governors and had a phone conversation with a representative from the local authority. I evaluated a range of action plans, behaviour logs, teaching records, minutes from recent governing body meetings and reports from your external educational consultant.
p.2
Context
There have been major staffing changes since the last inspection. Six full-time teachers have left the school, including two Year 5 teachers, one of whom was the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo). Three Year 6 teachers and one recently qualified teacher have also left. New appointments include four newly or recently qualified teachers, a new Year 4 teacher, one learning mentor and one teaching assistant. You are currently taking on the role of SENCo in the short term.
p.2
Main findings
You and your deputy headteacher make for a strong team. Together, you have shown a resolute will in wanting pupils and staff to be the best they can be. Although disappointed with the inspection outcomes, they did not come as a shock. You know your school well and have not shied away from tackling underperformance.
p.2
Main findings
Since the inspection, you have not wasted time and have made a number of improvements, especially in relation to improving pupils’ behaviour. There is now a simple and easy-to-understand behaviour policy in place. Teachers are consistently following this. Pupils and staff confirm that everyone is ‘singing from the same hymn sheet’.
p.2
Main findings
You have also developed effective support that helps pupils learn from their behavioural mistakes. As a result, there has been a sharp reduction in the number of incidents of poor behaviour. Pupils I spoke to confirm that classrooms are calmer places, allowing them to learn better.
p.2
Main findings
You recognise that some of your subject coordinators are more effective than others in checking on and improving teaching. Inexperienced subject coordinators are at an early stage of development and so are currently having less of an impact on improving pupils’ progress. Pupils’ work across the wider curriculum shows that there is still more to be done by subject coordinators to ensure that pupils, including those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities and the most able, are challenged.
p.2
Main findings
Staff morale and motivation are on the rise after a difficult period of staff turbulence. Teachers feel empowered and share a real team spirit. Staff say that they feel listened to and are able to make valuable contributions towards further improving the school. Newly and recently qualified teachers feel well supported and this has helped them get off to a smooth start this term. Older pupils I spoke to said that teaching is more interesting and ‘has more energy about it’.
p.2
Main findings
School improvement plans are not as helpful as they could be in driving change at a rapid pace. It is sometimes unclear exactly when actions will happen and what the intended impact will be for pupils. Governors are not afraid to pose challenging questions. Governors agree that current improvement plans are not as clear as they could be and this is making it more difficult to hold you and other leaders to account.
p.3
External support
The school is benefiting from a range of high-quality external support. The local authority has been effective in signposting strong practice in other local schools. As a result of work with Rawmarsh Rosehill and Kiveton Park Meadow junior schools, improvements have been made to the teaching of literacy and reading in particular. An external consultant also provides helpful advice and guidance that have helped refine and sharpen your work in improving the school.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Rotherham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion