Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Perham Down Nursery

Inspected 13 Sept 2017 · published 7 Oct 2017 · URN 146001

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Tiffany Morris

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    TNB Garrison Early Years and Play Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP906629

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Sept 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Tiffany Morris

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    SP11 9LF

  • Name on report verified

    Perham Down Nursery

  • URN verified

    146001

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−50Criticalmore positive than 40% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivesafesecuremake good progresstrusting relationshipsdelayeffectivelyconfidently
Criticismnot alwaysnot effectivebreachesat riskweakweaknessharmfails

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings272w−60
  • Leadership93w−69
  • What needs to improve347w−7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
701
shorter than usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
26%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 22%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 28%About the inspection 42%

Full report text

Perham Down Nursery Freemantle Road, Perham Down, Andover, SP11 9LF

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 13 September 2017 20 April 2015

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The manager does not swiftly follow Local Safeguarding Children Board procedures or liaise with the local statutory children's service agencies without delay. This has a significant impact on children's well-being and safety.  Staff do not ensure that children remain safe and secure and develop positive relationships with them. This significantly impacts on the younger children's social and emotional development.  The key-person system is weak. For example, links with some parents are not yet strong and staff do not have a clear knowledge of children's needs, particularly those that hear or speak a different language at home.  Staff do not focus on children next steps in learning to help them make the best possible learning. This means that gaps in some children's learning do not close quickly.  Self-evaluation is not effective in identifying key weakness and breaches of requirement.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children independently explore a wide range of activities enabling them to investigate and learn some new skills.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 implement the policy and procedures to safeguard children in line with the Local Safeguarding Children Board procedures and liaise with the local statutory children's service agencies without delay 20/09/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that children remain safe and secure and develop positive relationships with staff 20/10/2017

p.2

Due Date

 improve the key-person system to ensure that childcare is tailored to meet children's individual needs and to build positive relationships with their parents 20/10/2017

p.2

Due Date

 improve the quality of teaching to provide activities and experiences that help children move on to the next stage in their learning and make good progress in their development, including those children who need additional support. 20/11/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 improve self-evaluation to identify key areas for improvement and breaches of requirements.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed staff interacting with children.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector sampled a selection of documents, including policies, children's records and staff qualifications.  The inspector spoke to the manager and staff about safeguarding and child protection.  The inspector spoke to a selection of parents and took their views into consideration.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is not effective. The manager is aware of the signs that may indicate that children are at risk of harm. However, she fails to follow Local Safeguarding Children Board procedures to ensure children are kept safe. Staff do not always support younger children's social and emotional welfare needs effectively and ensure that children remain safe and secure. At times, this leads to a disorderly environment and impacts on the other children and the learning environment. The manager offers staff training. However, this is not fully effective in raising the quality of teaching.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Overall staff observe and assess children's progress. However, they do not plan effectively for children's next steps in learning. For example, children are not always given opportunities to develop their social skills with others. Partnerships with parents are not fully effective for staff to find out detailed information about all children's backgrounds and individual needs. This does not support those children who hear or speak other languages at home and staff cannot closely monitor and support their language development. Staff provide some enjoyable activities, for example, children explore a range of materials and natural objects. However, staff are not always aware of children's next stages of development and how an activity can support them to develop further.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Staff do not always respond quickly to children's emotional needs or give appropriate support to help them resolve or manage their feelings. This has a significant impact on children's ability to form ways to manage their feelings and form trusting relationships with staff and other children. Staff do not always respond quickly when children put themselves at risk of harm, such as when they put raw pasta in their mouths and walk around. Children have daily access to outdoor play and fresh air to help build on their physical skills and well-being.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Not all children are working towards developing key skills for starting school, particularly in their personal, social and emotional development. Staff do not help all children make the best possible progress. Some older children listen to instructions and independently manage their personal care. They use mathematical language in their play and confidently use a range of tools, such as safety knives to cut and explore vegetables. Older children hold conversations with each other and have their opinions valued, helping to build their confidence.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 146001 Local authority Wiltshire Inspection number 1089727 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 12 Name of registered person TNB Garrison Early Years and Play Committee

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 20 April 2015 Telephone number 01980 843556

p.4

reference number

Perham Down Nursery opened in 1980. It is located at Perham Down, at a military base near Upavon. The nursery is open between 8am and 4pm, during term time only. The committee employs seven staff. The setting receives early years education funding for two, three and four-year-old children. The manager holds a foundation degree in early years and all other staff hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion