Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Bamford Academy

Inspected 12 Sept 2017 · published 2 Oct 2017 · URN 137471

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Sept 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Quinn

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    OL11 5PS

  • Name on report verified

    Bamford Academy

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 21% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressenjoystrongimprovedpositivestrengthseffectiveambitious
Criticismlackconcernsweaknessconcerningdeclinenot effectivebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1160w+47
  • What needs to improve102w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,253
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Lisa Matthews Principal Bamford Academy Belgium Street Bamford Rochdale Lancashire OL11 5PS

p.1

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

Following my visit to the school on 12 September 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

You became principal shortly after the previous inspection and since then you have successfully addressed the areas for improvement that inspectors identified at that time. When necessary, you have challenged teachers’ underperformance and have introduced strategies to improve the quality of teaching. These include the appointment of a new subject leader for mathematics, who has provided coaching for teachers and revised the school’s calculation policy; and extra training for staff in the early years to develop their effectiveness.

p.1

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

Because of your actions, evidence from pupils’ work and from assessment information shows that most pupils across the school make good progress in mathematics now and that children in the early years make good progress from their starting points. However, you acknowledged during our joint observations that there was a lack of challenge seen in some classes, especially for a few of the most able. You also accepted that there were occasional instances where teachers lacked accuracy in their technical language.

p.1

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

You have improved the quality of the care you provide for pupils before and after school in your wrap-around-care clubs. You have made changes to staffing to bring about a more structured experience for pupils, who now enjoy activities such as dodgeball and craft. Staff also provide them with breakfast before school.

p.1

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

I spoke with a group of pupils from Year 5 and Year 6 during the inspection. These pupils showed themselves to be polite and confident. They told me that they enjoy coming to school and that they feel safe because there are ‘nice people here’. They find the adults in school friendly and trustworthy. They know they can speak to the school’s counsellor or to their teacher if they have any concerns. They take part in a range of clubs, like football and drama, and enjoy educational visits, such as residential adventure trips. These activities contribute well to pupils’ spiritual, moral social and cultural development. Pupils also said their teachers provide challenging work, and a typical comment was, ‘They push us to do our best.’

p.2

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

You also promote pupils’ appreciation of fundamental British values effectively. I met with members of staff who spoke knowledgably about the programme of themed events and planned lessons in, for example, religious education that support this aspect of pupils’ development.

p.2

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

The majority of parents are supportive of the school and its staff. Many of those who responded to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, made positive comments about the school, typically describing it as having a ‘fabulous community spirit’ and being a ‘lovely, warm, welcoming school’.

p.2

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

Governors are ambitious for the school and have an accurate picture of its strengths and areas to develop. They challenge you and your school leaders strongly, with minutes of meetings showing that they typically ask searching questions about the effectiveness of the education the school provides.

p.2

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

The school’s external consultant has an accurate view of the strengths and areas for development of the school. He provides effective support by advising members of the governing body who are responsible for managing your performance.

p.2

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. You record concerns appropriately and you are prompt in following up issues with other agencies, such as social services. The school’s record of checks on staff is compliant.

p.2

Short inspection of Bamford Academy

The school has a strong culture of safeguarding. Staff have received effective training and are knowledgeable about the signs of different types of abuse. Leaders have provided extra training about safeguarding issues that are specific to the local area, such as child sexual exploitation. Staff provide pupils with the knowledge they need to keep themselves safe in various situations. For example, pupils know how to stay safe online by not revealing personal information. They also develop road sense through programmes such as ‘Bikeability’, which improves their cycling skills.

p.2

Inspection findings

 I focused on a number of key lines of enquiry during the inspection, which I agreed with you at the beginning of the day. I have covered some aspects of these previously in this letter. They were related to safeguarding and to addressing the areas for improvement contained in the previous inspection report.  One line of enquiry I followed concerned the progress of children in Reception, especially in reading and mathematics. Recent unvalidated assessment information and evidence from children’s work indicate that the extra training you introduced to improve the quality of teaching in the early years has had a positive effect. The proportion of children reaching a good level of development, including in reading and writing, is above the most recent national average and is higher than in 2016.  Another focus was the progress of pupils in reading, writing and mathematics in key stage 1. You correctly identified that results at the end of Year 2 in 2016

p.3

Inspection findings

were well below the national averages for a number of groups. You made the improvement of teaching in key stage 1 a priority and introduced strategies such as peer coaching, which allows teachers to observe each other’s work and share good practice. The effectiveness of your actions can be seen in the good progress that current pupils make and in the improved achievement in reading, in writing and in mathematics in the provisional Year 2 results for 2017. There is also clear improvement in the proportion of pupils achieving at greater depth in these subjects. We observed good behaviour and attitudes to learning in our short visits to classrooms, but you accepted that sometimes in mathematics there was a lack of effective match between the task and pupils’ abilities.  My next focus was the apparent decline in a small number of aspects of achievement in the unvalidated Year 6 test results for 2017, especially concerning

p.3

Inspection findings

mathematics. Although most measures showed that pupils achieved in line with or better than the national average in many respects, you were prompt to identify the main weakness and have made improvement in mathematical questioning a priority for the current school year. You have rearranged staffing to match teachers’ skills to the appropriate year group. You anticipate that there will be no repeat of lower attainment among the current Year 6. Evidence from their work in Year 5 and from the school’s own assessment information indicates that they currently make good progress.  Finally, there were a few minor omissions from school’s website. Leaders have undertaken to rectify matters as soon as possible.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 they secure even better progress for pupils in mathematics in key stage 2 by developing strong mathematical questioning skills among teachers  in mathematics, teachers provide a more consistent match between tasks and pupils’ abilities, including challenge for the most able, and are accurate in their use of technical language  the school’s website is compliant and remains so.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Rochdale. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I carried out short visits to the early years and all year groups in key stage 1 and key stage 2, which were joint activities with you. I scrutinised a range of documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation summary, action plans for school improvement, records of incidents of bullying and misbehaviour, minutes of meetings of the governing body and records connected with the safeguarding of children. I held discussions with members of staff, governors and pupils. I had a discussion on the telephone with the external consultant you have commissioned. I analysed pupils’ work and the school’s own assessment information. I evaluated 76 responses received through Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey. I also analysed 41 responses to the staff questionnaire. There were no other survey responses.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion