Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Manchester
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Sept 2017
- Inspectors verified
Michelle Jacques
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY481649
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Weaknesses in the childminder's safeguarding knowledge and the failure to create a safe environment for children, compromise their well-being. p.3
- Her knowledge of how to make a referral, should a concern arise, is weak. p.3
- Despite this, the childminder has completed safeguarding training and understands how to identify signs and symptoms that may suggest a child is at risk from other types of harm. p.3
- Risk assessment procedures are inadequate. p.3
- The childminder's risk assessment procedures are ineffective. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure risk assessment procedures are robust to identify and minimise all hazards to children, with particular regard to chemicals, cleaning products and staples 05/11/2017 p.2
- have regard to the 'Prevent' duty guidance and be able to deal with concerns about extremism in an appropriate manner 05/11/2017 p.2
- improve knowledge and skills to impact on the quality of teaching. 05/11/2017 p.2
- ensure that information obtained through observation and assessment is used to plan sufficiently challenging activities to support children's progress. 05/11/2017 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“Risk assessment procedures are inadequate.” p.3Health & safety6
“Risk assessment procedures are inadequate.” p.3Records & policies4
“Risk assessment procedures are inadequate.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 771
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 5 September 2017 17 February 2017
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Requires Improvement
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Since the last inspection the childminder has focused her attention too closely on improving some aspects of her practice. This has led to a decline in other areas of her service. The childminder's risk assessment procedures are ineffective. The childminder does not adequately assess all areas of her home to identify and minimise potential hazards to children. For example, the childminder has not taken action to remove chemicals, cleaning products and sharp staples so children cannot access them. These objects present a hazard to children and compromise their safety. The childminder's knowledge relating to the 'Prevent' duty guidance is weak. This affects her ability to maintain children's welfare and safety. The quality of teaching is poor. The childminder does not extend children's language, thinking and problem-solving skills sufficiently. This impacts on children's overall development. The childminder does not use information obtained through observation and
p.1
This provision is inadequate
assessment to plan challenging activities for children. As a result, they are not supported well enough in their learning and do not make good progress from their starting points.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The childminder is gentle and kind. Children are happy in her care.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure risk assessment procedures are robust to identify and minimise all hazards to children, with particular regard to chemicals, cleaning products and staples 05/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
have regard to the 'Prevent' duty guidance and be able to deal with concerns about extremism in an appropriate manner 05/11/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve knowledge and skills to impact on the quality of teaching. 05/11/2017 ensure that information obtained through observation and assessment is used to plan sufficiently challenging activities to support children's progress. 05/11/2017
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. The inspector held a number of discussions with the childminder. She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of persons living in the household. The inspector spoke to children during the inspection. The inspector took account of the views of parents by reading written feedback provided.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is not effective. The childminder has failed to ensure her knowledge is up to date relating to changes in government legislation, particularly in relation to the 'Prevent' duty guidance. She is not aware of her responsibilities to recognise concerns relating to children being exposed to extreme views. Her knowledge of how to make a referral, should a concern arise, is weak. This impacts negatively on children's safety and welfare. Despite this, the childminder has completed safeguarding training and understands how to identify signs and symptoms that may suggest a child is at risk from other types of harm. Risk assessment procedures are inadequate. The childminder does not identify and remove hazards within her home. For example, chemicals, cleaning products and sharp staples are all accessible to children. The childminder has addressed some weaknesses in her practice since the last inspection. For example, improvements to child enrolment
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
records and child attendance monitoring mean all necessary information is now recorded. The childminder works closely with parents. She shares information with parents about children's routines and preferences. This enables her to provide care and complement what is delivered at home.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The quality of teaching is weak. The childminder fails to provide sufficient support to fully extend thinking, communication and problem-solving skills. For example, as children play, the childminder sits and supervises with limited interaction. She does little to build on what children already know and can do. Despite completing regular observations of children's achievements, the childminder does not plan suitably challenging activities. As a result, children do not make good enough progress. The childminder regularly leaves children to play alone for short periods. During these times, children are often waiting for her to return, rather than continuing with their play. This disrupts their learning and enjoyment. The childminder occasionally repeats words children say. At times, she counts and identifies colours of objects. However, she does not engage children in meaningful discussions, or do enough to develop their language and understanding. Despite poor
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
adult interaction, children enjoy exploring the range of toys available. They move from one resource to another and play with some engagement and imagination.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Weaknesses in the childminder's safeguarding knowledge and the failure to create a safe environment for children, compromise their well-being. Despite this, children smile at the childminder and are emotionally reassured by her presence. The childminder is clear in her expectations of children. For example, she makes sure they understand they must help her to tidy away toys when requested. Children behave well and enjoy a range of nutritious, home-cooked meals.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
The childminder does not guide or support children's learning effectively. Consequently, children do not make good enough progress in their learning. They are not developing the necessary skills for the next stage in their development and the eventual move on to school. However, children do experience some opportunities to develop their independence. For example, they have opportunities to select resources themselves.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY481649 Local authority Manchester Inspection number 1107912 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 6 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4
p.5
Name of registered person
Date of previous inspection 17 February 2017
p.5
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2014 and lives in Benchill, Manchester. She operates her provision all year round, from 6am to 8pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder offers overnight care. The childminder provides funded early education for two-year-old children.
p.5
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion