Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Sudbury Primary School

Inspected 12 Jul 2017 · published 21 Sept 2017 · URN 138608

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Jul 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Helen Morrison, Robert Greatrex, Susan Ladipo, Tim McLoughlin

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HA0 3EY

  • Name on report verified

    Sudbury Primary School

  • URN verified

    138608

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+68Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedgood progressstrongpositiveeffectivelyenjoysuccessful
Criticismseriousrequires improvementnot consistentlylacksnot alwayslackconcernsinconsistency

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1994w+63
  • Leadership712w+73
  • Safeguarding139w+57
  • What needs to improve77w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,862
about usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Leadership 20%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Sudbury Primary School Watford Road, Wembley HA0 3EY

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The headteacher is ambitious and has worked effectively with leaders and governors to raise standards.  Pupils in all year groups are making good progress. Effective systems are in place to ensure that groups of pupils do not underachieve because their progress is well understood. As a result, disadvantaged pupils are making better progress, though differences remain between them and their peers.  Governors have been effective in ensuring that leadership has improved outcomes for pupils. This has contributed to the school improving quickly. In particular, they have created stability within the school’s leadership team and this has resulted in rapid progress being made in the past year.  Teaching has not only focused on improving pupils’ skills in English and mathematics, but also on developing pupils’ work in the wider curriculum, through the work of specialist teachers, for example in the pupils’ work in art.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Pupils’ attendance is above what is typical for primary schools in England because they have a clear work ethic and all groups of pupils enjoy coming to school.  Teachers know the pupils well. Where teaching is good, learning is exciting and captures the interests of pupils. In some subjects and year groups, disadvantaged pupils could make even better progress by being given work which further challenges them.  Most-able pupils are not consistently well challenged. This is true in some subjects, including those taught by subject specialists.  Progress in reading and writing is not as great as that made by pupils across year groups in mathematics. This is because most-able pupils are not given sufficient challenge to work at greater depth.  From their starting points, children make good progress in the early years. Good provision in the Reception class means that children progress rapidly and are well prepared for Year

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

1.  Pupils show tolerance and kindness towards others and have a serious attitude to their work.  Pupils are well behaved and are willing to work hard. When the teaching lacks imagination, pupils’ attention can falter and they are more likely to lose concentration.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of teaching further by: – providing more opportunities for pupils to work at greater depth in reading and writing in key stage 2 – improving pupils’ progress in science, geography and history – making sure that all teachers deliver lessons which meet the needs of the most able pupils and those who are disadvantaged – ensuring that children in the Nursery class make the same good progress as children in the Reception classes.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Since the last inspection, the school has undergone several leadership changes. The headteacher has been in post for the past year and was initially seconded to the school from a local secondary school. She has made an effective partnership with the previous acting headteacher, who is now the school’s associate headteacher. They are well supported by an executive headteacher. These changes have brought about a consistent focus on raising standards of learning across the school, which has resulted in accelerated progress being made.  The headteacher has led the school with determination and skill. She has a clear vision to improve teaching and outcomes for all pupils and the current assessment information and work in pupils’ books show that this is proving successful.  Middle leaders are similarly ambitious for the school. Although some are new to their roles, they are proud of the work they have done thus far and hold a clear view of how

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

the work they do links directly with improved outcomes for pupils. A good example of this is the successful work to develop an innovative approach to the teaching of mathematics. This has led to increased expertise in this subject, which has led to significant improvements in teaching and rates of progress in key stages 1 and 2.  Pupil premium funding is used to support disadvantaged pupils through a range of activities in their learning across the curriculum. Funds support pupils more intensively through the work of the school’s well-deployed teaching assistants. Additionally, the money is used to develop these pupils’ self-esteem by enabling them to benefit from the range of extra-curricular activities that are available.  Although the school has a good awareness of the social issues, which may prevent disadvantaged pupils from making good progress, this is not always used to target interventions where they are most needed. For instance, a lack of focus in key stage 1

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

last year resulted in standards in this key stage being lower for disadvantaged pupils than their peers. This has improved over the current year and differences have diminished because of effective actions taken to address the identified issues.  The primary physical education (PE) and sport premium is carefully spent. PE teachers lead lessons in dance and additional equipment is being purchased to enhance outdoor sports participation. It has also helped to provide access to competitions. Pupils benefit from a good range of clubs and opportunities and take part in sports events with other local schools.  The school makes good provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. This is helping pupils gain a thorough understanding of life in modern Britain through a clear set of deeply held school values.  Sudbury’s curriculum is broad and diverse. As well as focusing on developing pupils’

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

key literacy and numeracy skills, pupils have experienced studying an appropriate range of other subjects. Work in art and PE is strong. Work in science, geography and history is less developed and pupils make less progress than in mathematics, for instance.  The school has received useful support from the Brent Schools Partnership. They have a good understanding of the school and have provided advice and consultancy to support leaders’ strategies. The school has found this helpful in gaining an accurate view of current standards.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Governors are effective and diligent in carrying out their duties, particularly in both supporting and challenging the headteacher and other senior leaders. They have acted on the recommendations of a review of governance following the previous inspection. Because of this, the significant issues holding back leaderships’ work at the school at the previous inspection have now been resolved. All senior leaders are now in step with the governing body and unified in their focus on raising standards at the school. They know the school very well and have been determined to ensure that the school achieves the best outcomes possible.  Governor committees provide a focus on pupils’ progress and curriculum provision. Governors question the progress of groups of pupils and the impact of additional funding, such as the school’s use of special needs funding and the pupil premium. Consequently, pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are making

p.4

Governance of the school

good progress and progress rates for disadvantaged pupils have shown recent improvement.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  School leaders have ensured that all members of staff are trained in child protection procedures. The school’s policies and practice are thorough. A strong culture of safety exists in the school where key staff engage with parents, carers and other stakeholders to ensure that all pupils are supported and safe.  Pupils are very confident that the school is a safe place and both parents and staff at the school who responded to Ofsted’s surveys or spoke with an inspector agree with this view. Governors are thorough in their checking of safeguarding procedures and place the safety of pupils uppermost in their work. School leaders work effectively with external agencies, such as social services, to ensure that when concerns are raised, they are always followed up quickly and with due care.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Teaching at Sudbury is good and teachers use their time well to ensure that all groups of pupils do well. Teachers have high expectations of the quality of work they expect in lessons and pupils know how to improve their work.  The promotion of language development is a strong feature of the teaching and this is helping pupils to become attentive listeners. They are eloquent when speaking to adults and one another.  The school has a very clear approach to the way in which work is assessed so that pupils can see easily how well they have done and how they can improve their work. This has been a helpful development since the last inspection, but some inconsistency remains in some subject areas, such as science, history and geography.  Teaching in mathematics is good because teachers make the lessons challenging and interesting for the pupils. For example, in a mathematics lesson, pupils worked at

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

different task to look at the relationship between multiplication and division. Their work was challenging because the teacher spotted when they found it easy and moved them on to work of greater complexity. This is typical of the diet pupils receive.  In some lessons, the most able pupils are not challenged enough. Consequently, this group of pupils sometimes spend too long on work that they can already do. This affects pupils’ behaviour during these lessons and, when they lose concentration, this can lead to them becoming distracted more easily.  Teaching staff have strong relationships with the pupils and make effective use of additional adults in their lessons, who are used to support pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. This strong work ethos supports pupils well as they know that the staff want them to do well. In turn, this has developed pupils’ positive attitudes towards school and a thirst for learning.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 The teaching of phonics and early reading is good. The school has employed subject specialist teachers to teach some subjects such as music, PE and art. In these subjects, teachers have good subject knowledge and use this to inspire pupils. In other subjects, such as science, geography, history and RE, teaching quality varies across and between year groups.  Pupils in key stage 2 are all now reaching at least average standards in reading and writing. However, not enough pupils achieve higher standards in reading and writing by the time they leave key stage 2. This is also true of the most able pupils.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Leaders have ensured that pupils are taught to show tolerance of diversity and awareness of how to be successful learners.  Positive messages about how to tackle and respond to bullying have been helpful to pupils. Pupils are particularly aware of how to keep safe while working on the internet. Pupils say that bullying is rare at the school, though were it to occur, they know the systems that exist are robust and easily accessible. The school’s records of behaviour incidents demonstrated this to be the case over time.  Leaders have instilled a sense of pride in the school, which is evident in how the pupils care about their appearance and the presentation of their work. They are taught how to show respect for one another, even if they hold very different beliefs or points of view.  Pupils show kindness and understanding in their attitudes towards one another and

p.5

Personal development and welfare

different groups of people in society. The school is developing pupils’ awareness of different faiths, races and cultures, although their work to develop awareness of different types of families and sexual orientation is not as well developed and, as a result, some pupils find this difficult to understand.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. They are confident, friendly and polite. They hold good attitudes to school life, take their work seriously and are respectful of the adults who teach them. Pupils help each other and hold positions of responsibility, which add to the productive culture of the school.  Since the last inspection, the school has worked effectively to create sensitive and consistent approaches to behaviour management. Teachers ensure that positive messages about good behaviour are consistently applied throughout lessons. This results in pupils behaving well. However, in a small number of lessons, their attention wanders and they occasionally lose concentration.  The school is a happy and calm place. Pupils want to come to school every day and demonstrate a serious attitude to their work.  Attendance rates have improved and are now above the typical averages for primary schools in England for all groups of pupils.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

 Current pupils are making very good progress in mathematics and improving rates of progress in reading and writing. This is reflected in their progress over time, in their books and their learning in lessons. Pupils’ work reflects the diligent way in which they approach their studies.  From their different starting points, pupils make good progress. This is seen in English and mathematics, and in a range of other subjects, including art and PE. Outcomes have improved continuously for pupils over the past two years in key stages 1 and 2.  The proportion of Year 1 pupils achieving the expected standards in the phonics screening check was above that seen nationally last year. Standards of reading are good and pupils read with clarity and understanding. They clearly enjoy reading and told inspectors about their favourite authors with great zeal.  In 2016, standards of attainment in key stage 2 were above the national averages in

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

mathematics and similar to national figures for reading and writing. In key stage 1, standards were similar to national averages in all subjects. School assessment information indicates that current pupils are on track to match at least the progress made in the previous two years. This is the result of improved teaching over time.  Pupils’ progress in science, history and geography is shallower than in English and mathematics, as pupils are not given sufficient opportunities to explore the curriculum in as great a depth.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are making better progress because the leadership of this area has improved since the last inspection. Their needs are now better identified and are given precise support by teachers and support staff.  Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education when they leave the school at the end of Year 6. This is because of the good foundation they receive at

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

Sudbury Primary School. Pupils are confident and positive about their future because they have learned well enough to be successful.  Disadvantaged pupils are making improved rates of progress. Leaders are tracking their progress closer and differences in progress and attainment are diminishing. Leaders recognise this difference and are committed to developing this area further through targeting additional support where it is most needed.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Staff plan carefully to ensure that children learn well and make substantial progress from their starting points to achieve improving levels of development that are now above those seen nationally.  In the Reception classes, teachers create a vibrant learning environment that enthrals children in activities that they find enjoyable and interesting. Teaching assistants work well to support children in developing effective learning behaviours. Children focus attentively upon phonics tasks and enjoy learning about the links between letters and sounds. Children settle swiftly to work and are well behaved and respectful towards one another.  Classrooms are well resourced and staffed so that adults can support many groups of children at the same time, and encourage them to explore the activities that are provided for them. Children are enthusiastic and work well together, enjoying the activities which take place both indoors and outside.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 This strength of provision is better in the Reception classes than the school’s Nursery class. In the Nursery, resources, particularly those intended to focus children’s attention on developing the key skills of reading, writing and number, are less well used. Teaching is less focused on promoting effective learning, as staff are less skilled at ensuring that resources available help children to excel in their development.  The recently appointed early years leader has made a very good start in her role. She, together with other senior leaders, carries out regular checks of children’s progress. This allows them to identify any gaps in children’s understanding and act to address them. As such, leadership and management of the early years provision is good. The early years leader has worked effectively to improve provision and has clear plans to develop the Nursery class.  Since the last inspection, the school has worked successfully to eradicate the difference

p.7

Early years provision Good

in the standards achieved by the school’s disadvantaged children so that they now achieve as well as their peers.  Children develop a very positive attitude to school life in the early years and are well prepared for moving into Year 1. They are already showing increased skill in writing longer pieces of text and enjoy their reading.  The school is developing effective partnership working with parents, who are invited in each week to share in learning activities. As a result, the school is able to build on the interests of the children and parents are kept aware of the work their children are doing.  Learning journals chart children’s progress over the Reception Year and contain a range of work, observations and photographs of children working independently. As well as becoming a valued keepsake for parents, teachers use this information to help plan work which builds on what the children already know.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.9

School details

Email address office@sudbury.brent.sch.uk

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 17 November 2015

p.9

Information about this school

 The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish.  The school is larger than most primary schools. The largest ethnic groups represented at the school are from Indian and other Asian backgrounds. The proportion speaking English as an additional language is above average. The proportion of pupils that join or leave the school during term time is slightly below average.  The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium is slightly below average. The pupil premium is additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and children who are looked after by the local authority.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching in samples of lessons in all year groups throughout the inspection, several of which were visited jointly with members of the school’s senior leadership team.  The inspection team heard some of the school’s pupils read, and looked at samples of work throughout the inspection.  Inspectors looked at a range of documents, including the school improvement plan, records of pupils’ behaviour, and information relating to safety, safeguarding and attendance. They also scrutinised information on individual pupils’ progress, anonymised records of teachers’ performance, and records of meetings of the governing body.  Inspectors met with teachers and spoke with pupils. A meeting was held with five members of the governing body. A meeting was also held with two representatives from the Brent Schools Partnership.  The views of parents were obtained through 36 responses to Ofsted’s online survey,

p.11

Information about this inspection

Parent View, as well as informal discussions, which were held with parents on the second day of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

Tim McLoughlin, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.11

Inspection team

Robert Greatrex Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.12

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion