Summary
Sam Hainey (lead), David Bryant, Diane Rochford, Stephen Hall
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Jul 2017
- Inspectors verified
David Bryant, Diane Rochford, Sam Hainey, Stephen Hall
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Outstanding
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
IG5 0DB
- Name on report verified
Parkhill Junior School
- URN verified
133939
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareOutstanding
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural (SMSC) skills are exceptionally well promoted and developed. p.1
- Pupils are prepared exceptionally well for life in modern Britain. p.3
- Reviews of pupils’ learning show that they are making consistently strong progress. p.7
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare Outstanding p.1
- Pupils’ SMSC knowledge and skills are very well developed. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics18
“Pupils take reading seriously.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,713
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Parkhill Junior School Lord Avenue, Clayhall, Ilford, Essex IG5 0DB
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders, governors and staff have created a culture at the school where pupils’ safety and well-being are at the heart of the school’s work. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural (SMSC) skills are exceptionally well promoted and developed. The headteacher has the confidence and full support of the school community. Staff morale at the school is high. The school’s motto of ‘enjoy learning’ flows throughout the school. Pupils’ attainment in reading, writing, mathematics and science is high. Pupils make progress in writing and mathematics that is above the national average. Pupils’ progress in reading has improved over time. In 2016, it was in line with the national average. The curriculum supports pupils in learning across a wide range of subjects. The range of clubs, visit and activities ensures that pupils can apply their knowledge and skills in different ways. The curriculum is securing good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
outcomes for pupils. Teaching is good overall. It is particularly effective in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils’ skills, for example in problem solving in mathematics, are well developed. Pupils’ behaviour is outstanding. Pupils work hard and are fully committed to their learning. Low-level disruption is rare. Pupils interact well with each other, both during lessons and at social times. Pupils relish the wide range of roles they have in the life of the school, for example, as ‘Rights Respecting ambassadors’, ‘digital leaders’ and ‘Parkhill parliament’. Pupils are confident and self-assured young people. These roles, together with the SMSC curriculum, are fully preparing pupils for life in modern Britain. Pupils love their school. It is palpable how well cared for pupils are. This is because staff know pupils and their families well. Leaders are always willing to try new things, for example ‘hot chocolate mornings’ to encourage parents
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
and carers to come into the school and learn alongside their children. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress overall. However, some teaching does not meet pupils’ more complex learning needs, including through the use of additional adults. Pupils make good progress in subjects other than English and mathematics. Teachers’ expectations in some subjects are not as high as they are in English and mathematics. Leaders have not yet ensured that their assessment processes of work in other subjects are thorough enough. Leaders are not precise enough in their improvement planning. There is a lack of specific progress and attainment targets for different subjects and groups that are the focus of leaders’ work.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by leaders at all levels by: – setting precise targets for different subjects and groups of pupils that can then be used to hold leaders to account – improving assessment processes so that pupils’ progress from their different starting points can be measured and monitored more accurately in subjects other than English, mathematics and science. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – teachers and adults more effectively meet the needs of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities so that they can make the progress of which they are capable – teachers consistently have the same high expectations for the quality of work that pupils produce in all their subjects to reflect that typically seen in English, mathematics and science.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Leaders have a created a school where pupils are developing into mature, caring and responsible young people. Pupils’ SMSC knowledge and skills are very well developed. Pupils of all ages can explain how respecting their rights affects their attitudes towards each other and their views on the world around them. Pupils speak about how well the school fosters positive relationships between different groups of pupils. They enjoy taking on responsibilities, for example in helping to design the playground and teaching each other about e-safety. Pupils are prepared exceptionally well for life in modern Britain. Leaders have ensured that pupils have high levels of literacy and numeracy. Pupils’ reading skills have improved over time. Leaders’ decisions on the reading curriculum and their investment in library facilities have ensured that pupils read widely and often. Pupils take reading seriously. Leaders have ensured that they challenge and support teachers in improving their
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
teaching and senior leaders ensure that middle leaders develop their skills to manage their curriculum areas confidently. Leaders manage teachers’ performance effectively. Staff morale is high. Almost all of the 30 staff who replied to Ofsted’s questionnaire strongly agreed that leaders are doing all they can to ensure that there is a motivated, respected and effective teaching staff. There are no teachers new to the profession currently employed at the school. Leaders use additional pupil premium funding well. Leaders track pupils’ attendance and progress carefully. They work directly with families as well as pupils to ensure that pupils are motivated to attend school and to be academically successful. As a result, pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds attain highly and make progress in line with other pupils nationally, particularly in English and mathematics. Leaders manage the physical education (PE) and sport funding effectively. It has
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
increased pupils’ access to a wider range of sporting experiences including golf, the scooter track and outdoor gym that pupils frequently use. Pupils who replied to Ofsted’s questionnaire and those that spoke to inspectors agree that the school encourages them to look after their physical health. Leaders have used additional funding for special educational needs and/or disabilities to secure good outcomes for pupils overall. However, there is some teaching and additional support from adults that are not enabling some pupils, particularly those who have complex needs, to fulfil their potential. The curriculum is securing good outcomes for pupils. Pupils learn a range of subjects including humanities, art, music, drama, computing, languages and design technology. Leaders create new and exciting projects to engage pupils’ interests, including an impressive range of clubs and visits. For example, the science, technology, engineering
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
and mathematics (STEM) project for girls in Years 5 and 6 is having a demonstrably positive impact on their attitudes towards mathematics and science. However, in some subjects in the wider curriculum, pupils’ progress is not as sustained and substantial as it is in reading, writing and mathematics. Similarly, leaders’ approaches to assessing and monitoring progress across the curriculum is not as thorough as it is in reading, writing and mathematics. Leaders’ school improvement planning identifies groups of pupils whose progress leaders are looking to improve. The plan includes details of actions and owners for each action. However, it does not specify the targets that leaders are looking to achieve in terms of the final impact on pupils’ outcomes, including in reading. As a result, it is more difficult for governors to hold leaders to account for their work.
p.4
Governance of the school
Governors are committed to and supportive of the school’s work. They have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Governors receive a wide range of information from school leaders, for example at the ‘curriculum committee’ and the meeting of the full governing body. Governors’ understanding of the school is enhanced by their decision to undertake focused visits to the school. These visits, in the words of one of the governors, are to see that leaders ‘are doing what they are saying’. Records show that these visits challenge school leaders on the impact of their work. Governors then share their findings at the full governing body meetings with each other.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have secure systems in place to support all pupils. Staff are aware of the risks facing young people at the school. They can identify the signs they should be alert to, for example, changes in pupils’ behaviour and attitudes. They subscribe to the belief that ‘it could happen here’. Adults report concerns promptly and leaders deal with them quickly. The school’s record keeping is of high quality and leaders audit their safeguarding work, including the ‘Prevent’ duty, regularly and thoroughly. The school makes use of a range of appropriate ways, including through counselling, to meet pupils’ needs. Pupils have a strong understanding of how to stay safe, particularly when using the internet. This is in part, due to the ‘digital leaders’. These are pupils who work with teachers to take responsibility for educating other pupils and parents on staying safe
p.4
Safeguarding
online. Pupils are also aware of how to stay safe on their journeys to and from school. Most parents who spoke to inspectors and those that replied to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents, feel that their children are safe at school. The voice of one parent, whose views echoed that of many others, stated that they had ‘no worries at all about leaving my son in school’. Parents were able to give specific examples of how the school helps their children to be safe and well. School leaders regularly survey parents. Their survey results reinforce the view that parents feel that their children are well looked after.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Teachers have good subject knowledge, which they typically use well, particularly in English, mathematics and science. When teaching is most effective, teachers ask probing questions that challenge pupils in their thinking. Teaching is motivating. Pupils enjoy learning and want to learn. Teachers have created a culture where pupils have highly positive attitudes to learning. Pupils self-regulate, for example, in selecting books or when teachers ask them to work together. Pupils have a range of opportunities to read across the curriculum. Teaching helps pupils to read fluently. As a result, pupils’ comprehension skills have improved quickly. Leaders’ decisions on strengthening the curriculum for reading are helping pupils to develop effective skills in inference, predicting and reasoning. Work in reading, writing, mathematics and science is typically challenging. Pupils enjoy challenge in their learning, whether that be in solving a difficult problem in
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
mathematics or writing an advertisement in English. Also, when teachers ask pupils to work in pairs or in groups, they do so quickly and purposefully. Pupils work well together. Teachers are typically good at checking pupils’ understanding during lessons. Their use of questioning and the guidance they give to pupils help them to know what pupils can and cannot do. Teachers use the information they gather from reviewing pupils’ learning to help refine their planning. Teacher’s expectations of pupils’ work in some subjects are not as high as they are in others, for example, English and mathematics. In some cases, pupils are not showing deep enough knowledge, skills and understanding. In other subjects, such as computing, pupils’ subject specific-skills are developing well. Teaching for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is good. However, particularly where pupils have more complex learning needs, some teaching
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is outstanding.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Leaders’ work to ensure that pupils have developed a deep sense of responsibility and maturity is impressive. It is striking how articulate and knowledgeable pupils are about the world around them. Pupils show a high level of tolerance and respect to any differences they find out about people. Pupils have formed a ‘festivals and celebration’ committee where they organise and celebrate events in relation to different religions and beliefs. Pupils have a deep understanding of their rights. Pupils can explain these rights and how they affect their lives fluently. The culture at the school is one where pupils resolve differences calmly and maturely. The wide range of pupils spoken to by inspectors and those who completed Ofsted’s survey were clear in their message: ‘bullying is not tolerated’. Pupils speak confidently about the different types of bullying. Parents agree with the views expressed by their children, that is, that bullying is rare
p.5
Personal development and welfare
and when it does happen, leaders deal with it effectively. The safeguarding curriculum at the school is age appropriate and practical. The strategies used by leaders and teachers are helpful. Pupils speak confidently about how to stay safe, whether that be about ‘stranger danger’, or their physical and emotional well-being. The playground is well designed and offers pupils a range of activities to meet their needs, including ‘quiet areas’ for pupils should they need it. Staff supervise all areas of the school well. Leaders support pupils well in preparing for secondary school and beyond. This includes ensuring that pupils have the speaking, writing and numeracy skills they need to access the curriculum. Pupils are also encouraged to think and talk about any concerns and worries that they have about secondary school. Pupils learn about jobs and careers in a variety of industries. Overall, parents and pupils feel that the school
p.6
Personal development and welfare
manages transition processes well, including for those pupils who move into Year 3.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is outstanding. Pupils behave impeccably. Pupils have the highest standards for their own behaviour. They regulate themselves and do not need reminders from teachers. During a lesson, an inspector was talking to pupils about behaviour. A pupil, whose words chimed alongside others, said low-level disruption is ‘highly unlikely’. When pupils play outside or when they move around the building, they do so calmly and safely. Pupils have a caring attitude towards each other. This impacts positively on their behaviour and how they talk and play with each other. Pupils take pride in their work. They want to do well and to achieve highly. Pupils are proud of their school and the role they play in it. Leaders manage attendance well, including using local authority support. No groups of pupils are underachieving due to low attendance. The school’s attendance has improved, including continuing to reduce persistent absence. Staff track attendance
p.6
Behaviour
meticulously and take quick action when needed. Leaders take a firm stance on not authorising holidays during term time.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
In 2016, pupils’ attainment in reading, writing, mathematics and science was high. In 2016, pupils’ progress in writing and mathematics was above the national average at the end of key stage 2. Reading progress, including for most groups from their different starting points, was in line with the national average. Pupils’ reading skills, particularly their comprehension skills, are now stronger. Pupils read confidently and regularly. Their reading records and reviews of pupils’ reading and literacy books show that pupils are successfully accessing more difficult comprehension skills. Pupils typically have strong speaking skills. They speak articulately and with maturity and about their learning, as well as about their views on their safety and well- being. Pupils’ mathematical skills are very well developed. Pupils are confident mathematicians. In one lesson, pupils were motivated and confident in working out
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
their solutions to hard problems. Pupils routinely have opportunities to use their reasoning skills to solve problems. They show their workings and can explain confidently how they approached their work. Leaders’ effective use of pupil premium funding has resulted in disadvantaged pupils achieving in line with other pupils nationally from their different starting points. There are no significant differences between the progress made by current disadvantaged pupils and their peers. The most able pupils achieve well. In 2016, they achieved significantly above the national average in mathematics. Reviews of pupils’ learning show that they are making consistently strong progress. This is because teaching is challenging and making them think. Leaders organised a STEM programme for a group of 14 girls in Years 5 and 6 in early 2017. Pupils recently ‘graduated’ from the programme and the outcomes they achieved
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
were impressive. Pupils were able to explain confidently about how the activities, visits and learning experiences motivated them to engage more in mathematics and science. Pupils on the programme attained highly, considering their starting points, in science and mathematics in 2017. Teaching is not fully effective in meeting the needs of the range of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. This group of pupils make good progress overall, particularly for those who have higher cognitive ability. However, some teaching and support provided do not meet the more complex needs of pupils. In other subjects across the curriculum, pupils have a wide range of opportunities to apply their knowledge and skills. However, the quality of their work is not consistently of the same high quality that it is in reading, writing, mathematics and science. Overall, leaders are preparing pupils well for the next steps in their education.
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Website www.parkhill-junior.redbridge.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Email address admin.parkhill-jun@redbridge.gov.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 5–6 December 2012
p.8
Information about this school
The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The proportion of pupils at the school eligible for free school meals is well below the national average. Most pupils are from an Asian background. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is in line with the national average. Pupils who attend the school have above-average prior attainment from their primary school education. There are no pupils attending alternative provision. The school currently meets the government’s floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ progress and attainment.
p.8
Information about this inspection
The inspection team visited lessons in a range of subjects and year groups. Leaders accompanied inspectors to some of the lessons visited. During these visits, inspectors also looked at pupils’ learning over time. Inspectors reviewed a large number of books in a range of subjects across the curriculum. Inspectors met with several different groups of pupils to hear about their views of the school’s work. The inspection team held meetings with senior and middle leaders to evaluate the impact of their work. The lead inspector held separate meetings with governors and the local authority. The lead inspector also met with a small group of parents. Other inspectors met parents dropping off their children at school. The inspection team evaluated 11 responses to Parent View, 48 responses to the pupil survey and 30 responses to the staff survey. Inspectors evaluated leaders’ surveys of staff, pupil and parent views that had been previously undertaken. Inspectors also
p.10
Information about this inspection
considered an email communication from a parent. Inspectors scrutinised a variety of documentation provided by leaders, including: internal assessment information for pupils in all year groups; leaders’ self-evaluation; the school improvement plan; minutes of governing body meetings; attendance and behaviour information; case studies; a variety of school policies; the single central record of recruitment checks; evidence of SMSC across the school; and a wide range of other information relating to the safeguarding of pupils.
p.10
Inspection team
Sam Hainey, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Diane Rochford Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion