Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 18 Jul 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rob Hackfath

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Jul 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rob Hackfath

  • Postcode verified

    ST2 8DD

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongeffectivelyclearconfidentlyenthusiasmenthusiasticsuccessful
Criticismpoorconcernerrorsnot effectivelyvariationlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,164
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Katie Dixon Headteacher Birches Head Academy Birches Head Road Hanley Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST2 8DD

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your school on 18 July 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, other leaders, an external consultant commissioned by the school and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I undertook brief visits to a number of lessons accompanied by members of the senior leadership team, and looked at examples of pupils’ work. I evaluated a range of documents and records, including the school improvement plan, information about attendance and behaviour, and school policies.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, you have made some changes to the senior leadership team. These changes include the promotion of colleagues already at the school and the appointment of new staff. You have restructured senior leaders’ roles in response to the school’s improvement priorities. You have developed a new structure for pastoral middle leadership posts, ready for September 2017. Some new members have strengthened the governing body’s educational expertise.

p.2

Context

Leaders and governors have made the decision for the school to join a local multi- academy trust (MAT). The local authority supports this decision. The process of the school’s conversion to become an academy is under way. Beneficial links with the MAT have already been identified, and plans to develop these formally are in place.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers take into account pupils’ prior learning and starting points when planning lessons. Lesson plans include clear identification of learning questions which are structured to increase the amount of challenge throughout the lesson. Sometimes, to reflect their starting points, pupils work on different tasks from those of their peers. As a result, there is now more suitable challenge for pupils in lessons, particularly for the most able pupils. Pupils can confidently identify their starting points based on their past successes, and select appropriate tasks when they are expected to do so.

p.2

Main findings

In mathematics, teachers use questioning effectively to encourage pupils to think more deeply about their learning and justify their answers. These opportunities provide pupils with the chance to consolidate their learning. Where pupils have securely developed resilience and problem-solving skills, they approach challenging and demanding questions with enthusiasm and confidence. They learn well from errors they make, and they benefit from valuable opportunities to learn from each other. Occasionally, teachers do not target their questioning effectively. This leads to a dominance in discussions of the most enthusiastic pupils. As a result, sometimes teachers do not make sure that other pupils are sufficiently engaged in their learning. Teachers regularly use examination assessment criteria in their feedback to pupils. Pupils value this sharply focused dialogue with their teachers, and approach follow-up activities in a purposeful manner.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders focus on developing teachers’ use of strategies and approaches to engage pupils who are uninterested in learning. For example, professional development sessions focus on how teachers can develop pupils’ resilience. Your decision to appoint lead practitioners in the school encourages effective sharing of the strong practice that exists within the school.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders’ recent decision to alter the structure of the school day makes sure that there are valuable opportunities for pupils to read regularly. Form tutors focus on developing pupils’ literacy skills and confidence. Teachers make a point of using subject-specific terms in lessons, and insisting that pupils to do the same. As a result of this support, pupils’ literacy levels are developing. For example, pupils’ reading ages are improving.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, the school’s special educational needs coordinator has established a comprehensive and systematic approach to track how well pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are achieving. Staff regularly review and evaluate which strategies most effectively support these pupils in the classroom. As a result, the special educational needs coordinator has an oversight of the progress that pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make, and can develop teachers’ approaches in class. When required, they can also provide additional interventions for these pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders continue to make improvements in pupils’ attendance. They promote to pupils the benefits of high attendance. High attendance is celebrated and rewarded. Parents of pupils whose attendance is a concern are invited to clinics at school and form tutors develop attendance plans to support pupils. There have been marked improvements in attendance for particular pupil groups, including disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Your recent analysis of assessment information for Year 11 shows that there are expectations of improvement across many subjects. For example, you expect strong improvements in attainment in science for all pupils, and in mathematics for disadvantaged pupils in this year’s GCSE results. Variation in pupils’ outcomes between subjects is reducing as you address the legacy of previous poor teaching, but it still remains. You expect the differences in outcomes between disadvantaged pupils currently in Year 11 and other pupils nationally to diminish in many subjects. Lower down the school, these differences continue to reduce. An increasing number of pupils currently at the school are studying for qualifications which contribute to the English baccalaureate because of clearer guidance when pupils pick their options.

p.3

External support

Effective external support is provided to the school from a variety of sources. A national leader of education (NLE) continues to work with the school, providing targeted leadership support and development for senior and middle leaders. The NLE provides external validation of leaders’ actions and ensures that plans for school improvement are firmly grounded in clear evidence about how well the school is doing. The NLE also models leadership behaviours and practice, for example working alongside middle leaders to monitor the quality of teaching and learning. This develops middle leaders’ skills and confidence.

p.3

External support

Middle leaders participate in subject networks with colleagues from the MAT that the school is intending to join. These opportunities enable external validation of assessment information and the development of teaching schemes in response to national qualification changes.

p.3

External support

Leaders’ decision to participate in a city-wide mathematics project has also provided successful additional leadership and teaching capacity within the school’s mathematics department. This has contributed to better progress in mathematics.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Stoke-on-Trent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion