Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Eastlea Community School

Inspected 13 Jul 2017 · URN 102784

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jul 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Anne Murray-Hudson, Beverley Johnston, Carolyn Dickinson, James Whiting, Katerina Christodoulou, Tim Williams

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    E16 4NP

  • Name on report verified

    Eastlea Community School

  • URN verified

    102784

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressconsistentlyimprovedeffectivelygood progresssafepositiveimproving
Criticismrequires improvementnot consistentlydisruptionuneventoo oftenlacknot good progresstoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings702w−10
  • Leadership131w+25
  • Safeguarding102w+68
  • What needs to improve1416w−12

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,285
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 46%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Eastlea Community School Pretoria Road, Canning Town, London, Essex E16 4NP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Too many pupils are not making the progress expected for their age. This is particularly the case for the most able pupils.  In 2016, Year 11 pupils did not achieve as well as other pupils nationally in many subjects, including in English and mathematics.  Leaders do not systematically monitor and evaluate academic and pastoral performance, including attendance. As a result, self- evaluation has been over-generous and improvement plans are not focused sharply enough.  The quality of teaching is not consistently good. For example, teachers do not use questioning well enough to deepen pupils’ understanding.  At times, teachers do not use assessment information effectively to plan work that has the right level of challenge. As a result, pupils do not make sustained progress.  Pupils’ attendance is close to the national average. However, attendance of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities remains low.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The broad and balanced curriculum is complemented with a range of extra-curricular activities which promote good personal development.  Pupils are well behaved. They treat each other with respect and act maturely around the school site. Instances of disruption in lessons are rare.  Pupils have positive attitudes to learning.  Leaders have ensured that the quality of careers education and independent advice and guidance that pupils receive is good. As a result, pupils are well informed to make decisions about the next stage of their education.  The promotion of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is a strength of the school.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by ensuring that: – monitoring and evaluation processes enable leaders and teachers to compare the progress of different groups of pupils from their starting points – leaders and governors evaluate the impact of additional funding on the achievement and attendance of disadvantaged pupils; and of those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – teachers consistently plan activities which closely match the abilities and prior attainment of pupils, particularly the most able – teachers develop their use of questioning to deepen pupils’ understanding – pupils know exactly what they need to do improve their work. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

order to ascertain how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 The school’s leadership, including the governing body, has not been successful in sustaining the good quality of education seen at the previous inspection in March 2014.  School leaders, including governors, have not evaluated the performance of the school accurately. This has led to complacency and an acceptance of pupils’ poor progress from different starting points. Although expectations are now higher, senior leaders have not secured consistently strong teaching so that pupils make good progress across a range of subjects.  The quality of middle leadership is variable. Some middle leaders have not ensured that teaching improves rapidly in their subject areas. In some areas, such as English and science, teaching is improving quickly, but in others change is slow. This has resulted in uneven progress for pupils.  Good practice in the application of the school’s policies in subjects such as English and

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

science is not replicated across all subject areas.  Leaders have not ensured that the funding to support disadvantaged pupils is targeted precisely to raise attainment. However, Year 7 catch-up funding is used more effectively and is improving the pupils’ reading ages.  Teachers’ performance management is rigorous and staff are set clear targets. Newly qualified teachers are enthusiastic and value the supportive and constructive feedback they receive from mentors.  The curriculum is broad and balanced and fully inclusive to ensure equality of access to those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, including those with profound disabilities.  Additional study in philosophy and Mandarin is offered to the most able pupils. They also receive one-to-one mentoring from local business personnel and take part in a range of trips to deepen their knowledge and understanding, such as visits to leading

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

universities. There is insufficient evaluation of the impact of this programme on the progress of the most able pupils.  Governors, leaders and teachers are all committed to maintaining the inclusive nature of the school, which welcomes pupils of all abilities and backgrounds. They are keen to meet the needs of every pupil. The school integrates pupils with profound special educational needs and/or disabilities into mainstream school life very effectively.  School leaders promote well pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and ensure that pupils are prepared well for life in modern Britain. Pupils develop a good understanding of and respect for different cultures and religions through a programme of personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education. Pupils are also helped to develop a good understanding of the importance of democracy and the rule of law.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Governors are very supportive of senior and other school leaders and are involved in the life of the school. There is a good breadth and depth of expertise on the governing body. However, they do not challenge senior leaders robustly enough about pupils’ achievement and attendance.  Governors’ knowledge of the effectiveness of the school in some crucial areas has been limited. For example, governors are not clear on how pupil premium funding is used to raise the achievement of eligible pupils.  The governor responsible for safeguarding works closely with leaders to check that the school’s procedures for keeping pupils safe are effective. All members of the governing body fully understand their responsibilities regarding keeping pupils safe.  Governors are rightly proud of the inclusive ethos of the school.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Appropriate checks are carried out to ensure that staff are safe to work with pupils. The recording of these checks meets statutory requirements.  There is a culture of keeping pupils safe right across the school. All staff are trained appropriately and understand their responsibilities. Pupils say they feel safe in school.  School leaders ensure that vulnerable pupils who face substantial personal challenges in their lives are given the support they need to be successful. School staff work well with parents and the local authority to protect those in need of care and support.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is too variable between and within subjects.  School leaders have not given middle leaders clear direction as to how pupils’ work should be assessed. There are too many different systems of assessment used between departments and within departments. Consequently, teachers do not consistently use pupils’ prior assessment information to plan lessons to help pupils to make good progress from their various starting points.  Too often, pupils complete the same work as their peers, regardless of whether it is too easy or too hard for them. As a result, pupils across the range of ability are not provided with challenge or support that allows them to make consistently good progress.  The use of questioning to deepen pupils’ knowledge and understanding is uneven. Where questioning is more skilful, for example in science and English, pupils provide extended answers which are used to deepen the learning of others. However, where

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

less effective questioning is used, pupils’ answers lack depth of understanding. Consequently, pupils do not make consistently good progress.  There is inconsistency in the way teachers apply the school’s policy on feedback to pupils. For example, learning in mathematics and French is sometimes hampered because of a lack of clear guidance. This means that pupils’ work in these subjects is, too often, not of the standard expected for their age. In subjects such as English and science, feedback contributes to pupils’ good progress.  Teachers’ expectations of the most able pupils are inconsistent. There are times when pupils are given opportunities to extend themselves, for example by discussing ideas and solving complicated real-life problems. However, this does not happen often enough, and at times they are given tasks which fail to stimulate them.  Pupils’ positive attitudes to learning lead to a pride in their work. This was evident

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

across the subjects and from all ability levels.  Teaching assistants are used well to help pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. They encourage pupils’ independence by providing a good balance of challenge and support.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils feel well cared for and safe. They value the help provided by the student support team of staff.  Pupils are known as individuals by staff. Relationships between pupils and teachers are good. Pupils feel confident that they can approach staff with a problem when they need to.  School leaders have successfully developed pupils’ awareness of the need to be alert to threats such as gang crime, extremism and sexual exploitation. Pupils have good knowledge about matters of safety when using technologies, including the internet.  The vast majority of pupils are proud of their school. They wear their uniform well and the site is clean and free from litter.  Pupils enjoy good opportunities to develop their personal views and understanding of world affairs, during mentor (form) time, PSHE education lessons and after-school

p.5

Personal development and welfare

clubs. For example, in a form period, pupils were considering the roots of extremist behaviour. Pupils were able to discuss values and beliefs that different faiths have in common and the importance of inter-faith collaboration .  Older pupils told inspectors that they feel well informed about their career choices for the next stage of their education or training. They have access to good-quality, impartial advice and time is devoted to exploring the wide range of opportunities available.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils behave well in lessons; they are keen and ready to learn. At break, lunchtime and at the change of lessons, pupils move around the school in a sensible, orderly and timely manner and are polite to visitors.  Pupils’ attendance is broadly in line with other schools nationally. Persistent absence and the absence levels of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities remain higher than for other pupils nationally. Leaders routinely follow up on absent pupils. However, the impact of their work lacks sharp analysis.  A small proportion of pupils have particularly challenging medical circumstances which prevent them from attending regularly. The school works effectively with other agencies, including health professionals, to minimise disruption to learning for these pupils.  Pupils report that bullying is rare and when it does occur it is swiftly dealt with by staff.

p.5

Behaviour

The inclusive nature of the school enables pupils to have a strong awareness of the individual needs of others.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils across the school are not making good progress overall. This is the result of inconsistencies in the quality of teaching.  Over the last three years, pupils have made significantly less progress in mathematics and English than found nationally. This is particularly the case for middle-attaining and most-able pupils. Current school assessment information and work in books indicates that progress in both mathematics and English is now improving and pupils are achieving more. However, there remains too much variation in progress between groups of pupils.  In humanities subjects, many pupils achieved broadly the same outcomes as other pupils nationally in 2016, but this was not the case for the most able pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils. Work in books and the school’s assessment information shows that these pupils are now making improved progress.  The progress and attainment of disadvantaged pupils is uneven across the school. So,

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

too, is the progress of those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. In 2016, these pupils made progress that was considerably below that of their peers nationally. Some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities successfully follow alternative courses to GCSE, such as applied and general science, which equip them well for the next stage of their education.  The most able pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils, have not been stretched sufficiently in recent years. Across a range of subjects in 2016, a smaller proportion of these pupils attained the top grades at GCSE than found nationally. The work in pupils’ books shows that the most able pupils currently in the school respond well to better teaching.  Outcomes for lower-ability pupils are better than for other groups in the school. The progress of these pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, is stronger than that

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

of other pupils nationally with the same starting points.  Many pupils join the school in Year 7 with standards in reading, writing and mathematics which are well below the national average. The Year 7 catch-up funding helps pupils with low literacy and mathematical skills to improve. However, they do not apply the skills that they gain consistently across subjects.  The school promotes reading for all pupils and provides support for pupils to overcome any barriers. The strategies used include regular reading lessons for key stage 3 pupils and the use of computer systems that check their understanding of what they are reading. As a consequence, reading standards are improving.  Pupils who attend off-site provision at Education Links make good progress towards their learning goals because teaching is tailored to their needs.  Despite underachievement in key stage 4, the number of pupils who go on to further

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

education or training remains high. This is because the quality of information, advice and guidance is tailored to individual pupils, and helps them to achieve appropriate next steps in their education or training.

p.7

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Email address info@eastlea.newham.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 27–28 March 2014

p.8

Information about this school

 The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The school is an average-sized secondary school.  The proportion of pupils at the school who are disadvantaged is above average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average.  More pupils join and leave the school part-way through their secondary education compared with pupils nationally.  A very small number of pupils attend alternative educational provision at Education Links.  The majority of pupils are of minority ethnic heritage. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is well above average.  In 2016, the school met the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress by the end of Year 11.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 The inspection team visited teaching sessions across a wide range of subject areas in Years 7 to 10. The majority of these visits were conducted together with members of the senior leadership team.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and senior leaders. Inspectors looked at work in pupils’ books and spoke to pupils informally during observations of teaching and around the school. They also met with groups of pupils from Years 7 to 10. Inspectors listened to selected pupils read.  Meetings were held with staff, including newly qualified teachers, pastoral and academic senior and middle leaders.  An inspector spoke with a representative from the local authority via the telephone and met with a governor.  Inspectors took into account the views of 15 parents who responded to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire. There were no responses from staff or pupils to the inspection surveys.

p.10

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors scrutinised a variety of documentation provided by the school including: assessment information for pupils currently at the school; the school’s self-evaluation; improvement plans; minutes of meetings; attendance and behaviour information; case studies; the single central record of recruitment checks; and other information relating to the safeguarding of pupils.

p.10

Inspection team

Carolyn Dickinson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

James Whiting Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion