Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

Inspected 27 Jun 2017 · published 12 Sept 2017 · URN 101878

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 Jun 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mehar Brar

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    UB1 1DR

  • Name on report verified

    Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 16% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelystrongimprovedrigorousenjoyhigh expectationseffectivegood progress
Criticismconcernspersistent absenceweakernot stronglowerslowly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1273w+45
  • What needs to improve92w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,354
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr David Woods Headteacher Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School Beaconsfield Road Southall Middlesex UB1 1DR

p.1

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

Following my visit to the school on 27 June 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in December 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

From September 2015, the school expanded by admitting pupils into two forms from Reception. Currently, there remains one form from Year 2 upwards. Leaders managed the accompanying changes in staffing, accommodation and provision for pupils thoughtfully and carefully so that the school continues to improve. You have improved and updated school assessment procedures and the curriculum in response to national changes. Your checks on teaching and learning are rigorous and you use a broad range of professional development opportunities to help teachers improve the quality of teaching. Your school values of self-belief, perseverance and success for life are modelled well by teachers and pupils. Pupils understand, for example, that it is important ‘to keep trying’ when learning is difficult.

p.1

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

Parents and carers overwhelmingly agree that the school is welcoming and inclusive. Pupils say that they enjoy school and learn well because teachers help them with their learning and make lessons interesting. Their views and efforts reflect the school’s ethos of high expectations and ambition to succeed. This is demonstrated by the end of key stage 2 results in 2016, which showed pupils’ progress in mathematics was significantly above the national average.

p.1

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

At the previous inspection, an area to improve was to provide more challenging learning opportunities for the most able pupils. Pupils say that they enjoy their ‘challenge’ activities in lessons, but that the work provided could be even more stretching.

p.1

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

Your assessment system now provides teachers with more precise information about pupils’ progress and attainment. Teachers typically use this information, and their professional development, effectively to plan and adapt work so that they can provide targeted support and challenge for pupils. Consequently, current pupils are making good progress in reading and writing. Progress in mathematics is now much stronger than at the time of the previous inspection. Pupils are developing their reading, writing and numeracy skills effectively in other subjects, such as science and geography, for example through investigations in science lessons and research activities in geography.

p.2

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. Regular training ensures that staff have an up-to-date understanding of risks to pupils. For example, they help pupils understand how to use the internet safely. They also help pupils understand their rights and responsibilities and the importance of respecting the views of others so that we can live together as harmonious communities.

p.2

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

Staff understand the school’s rigorous procedures for reporting concerns about pupils’ safety. For example, the early reporting system is well used by teachers to report concerns about any possible risks to pupils’ well-being and safety. Leaders use these reports to identify any patterns and take further action as necessary. Detailed records, timely responses and partnerships with external organisations ensure that any referrals and concerns are resolved as quickly as possible.

p.2

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

Governors have a secure understanding of safeguarding issues based on reports from the school and their own visits. They have supported the work to enhance parents’ understanding of safeguarding issues. This collaborative focus on safeguarding contributes to a secure culture of vigilance and safety.

p.2

Short inspection of Beaconsfield Primary and Nursery School

Pupils say that they feel safe in school because staff are caring and act promptly upon any concerns raised. Surveys of pupils and parents confirm this view. Cases of bullying are rare and are dealt with promptly and effectively, further underpinning pupils’ welfare.

p.2

Inspection findings

 A focus for the inspection related to the accuracy of your self-evaluation and how well this evidence is used to ensure strong progress across the range of subjects that pupils learn.  Your checks on learning are accurate and reliable. Governors also understand this information and are effective in holding you to account about how well pupils are learning. The improvements in teaching, learning and assessment are the result of staff using detailed information and training to improve their work. The strong outcomes by the end of Year 6 result from a culture of hard work, supported by a focus on improving pupils’ skills and knowledge. This is accompanied by an increasing level of responsibility being taken by pupils for their own learning. You recognise that there is still a need to provide challenging learning activities and opportunities for pupils who are capable of working at a greater depth sooner,

p.2

Inspection findings

including the most able pupils.  Improvements in the quality of teaching, particularly in mathematics, are evident throughout the school. Your additional resource provision (ARP) continues to provide good support for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities across the school, as well as those who learn within the ARP.  The inspection also focused on the progress made by boys and disadvantaged pupils within early years and in key stage 1. This is because in 2016, boys attained less well compared with girls by the end of Reception. This difference remained up to the end of Year 2 for reading and writing. No disadvantaged pupils had reached higher levels of attainment by the end of Year 2.  Staff have used the training you have provided for them, particularly the mentoring by senior leaders, to improve the quality of their teaching. Expectations for pupils’ learning are clearer and they understand the progress

p.3

Inspection findings

that they are making. This includes what pupils need to do to improve their work. Your assessment information and wider checks on learning show that the difference between boys and girls by the end of Reception is closing, but only slowly. Boys join the school with lower levels of language and communication skills, and a few have complex additional needs. You are clear about further actions you need to take to give this improvement more impetus.  By the end of Year 2, the difference in attainment between boys and girls is smaller and improvements have been quicker. Staff training is increasingly effective and inspection evidence shows that the improvements are sustainable. For example, our joint checks on learning and your assessment information showed that the progress made by disadvantaged pupils is now in line with other pupils nationally by the end of Year 2.  A further focus of the inspection was on the impact of leaders’ work to reduce

p.3

Inspection findings

persistent absence overall. This was an issue for most groups of pupils and particularly boys. In addition to weaker attendance, the progress of boys, particularly in reading and writing, was not as strong up to Year 2.  You have made clear the importance of good attendance across the school, including with parents. You have developed more refined sanctions and incentives, and used support from the local authority effectively. These strategies have improved attendance.  Persistent absence of pupils is lower this year compared with last year. A larger proportion of pupils attend well. Boys’ attendance is better now than last year. In Years 5 and 6, attendance is particularly good. You know there is more to do to improve attendance of pupils in Year 3 and Year 4. The school is working to ensure that all families support the school’s attendance policy, including recognition of the potentially negative impact of pupils missing school to go on

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 the progress made by the most able pupils at least matches that of other most- able pupils nationally by providing these pupils with work that is sufficiently challenging  the achievement of boys improves further so that boys make stronger progress from their starting points, particularly in early years.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Ealing. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I met with you and the senior leadership team, and the vice-chair of governors. I spoke with a representative of the local authority by telephone and had a formal discussion with pupils. I considered the 11 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, and examined your own pupil and parent surveys. We jointly visited lessons to observe learning and scrutinise pupils’ work. I evaluated a range of documentation in relation to safeguarding and the school’s website. I reviewed additional documentation related to leaders’ monitoring of the quality of teaching and learning, the school’s self-evaluation and improvement plans, procedures for safeguarding and assessment information and current attendance information.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion