Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Anderton Primary School

Inspected 22 Jun 2017 · published 7 Sept 2017 · URN 119202

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Mark Quinn (lead), Neil Dixon (lead), Linda Griffiths

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    22 Jun 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Linda Griffiths, Mark Quinn, Neil Dixon

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    PR6 9NN

  • Name on report verified

    Anderton Primary School

  • URN verified

    119202

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivemake good progressgood progresseffectivelyconsistentlystrongstrengthsclear
Criticismnot consistentlyrequires improvementnot strongweaknessesvariablelackpoorlyconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings551w+9
  • Leadership99w+14
  • Safeguarding108w+46
  • What needs to improve2276w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,959
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 15%Leadership 3%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 61%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Anderton Primary School Babylon Lane, Adlington, Chorley, Lancashire PR6 9NN

p.1

Inspection dates 6 June and 21 – 22 June 2017

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Pupils in key stage 1 do not make consistently strong progress across a range of subjects, including English and mathematics.  In subjects other than English and mathematics, progress is variable across the school.  Leaders’ plans to improve pupils’ achievement do not have statements that say how they will precisely measure the success of their actions.  Leaders of subjects other than English and mathematics do not have a clear system to assess and track pupils’ progress.  The quality of teaching is not consistent across key stage 1.  Teachers do not provide work that deepens pupils’ knowledge consistently enough.  Teachers do not provide challenging work to the most able pupils with enough regularity.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The headteacher has managed staffing issues well and has begun to make the improvements that the school needs to secure pupils’ more consistent progress.  The atmosphere is friendly and the premises are well kept. Staff and pupils have a clear sense of pride in their school.  Pupils behave well and their overall attendance is above the national average.  Children in the early years settle well and make good progress from their starting points.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of leadership and management by: – making sure that all leaders include in their improvement plans precise criteria for evaluating the success of their actions on pupils’ achievement – putting in place an efficient system for assessing and tracking pupils’ progress in subjects other than English and mathematics, so that leaders of these subjects have a clear view of standards.  Secure consistently strong progress across year groups and a wide range of subjects by: – building on the effective teaching in key stage 2 to ensure that teaching in key stage 1 is more consistently effective in English and mathematics – ensuring that pupils acquire the relevant knowledge, understanding and skills more securely in subjects other than English and mathematics – regularly providing work that challenges the most able pupils.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 There has been a decline in pupils’ achievement in recent times, but the headteacher is determined to put this situation right. She has managed effectively some staffing issues that have contributed to the weaknesses identified in recent published assessment information, including tackling some underperformance. She also has appropriate systems in place for checking the quality of teaching, but these are not currently having a strong enough effect on improving provision across the school.  Senior leaders have understandably focused on improving standards in English and mathematics. There is evidence of good progress in these subjects in key stage 2, but pupils’ progress in English and mathematics in key stage 1 remains variable. Furthermore, the progress of pupils in subjects other than English and mathematics is not consistently strong.  Leaders check the performance of teachers regularly. They give them targets based on

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

pupils’ achievement. Leaders plan appropriate training for staff to enhance their teaching skills. These processes have been at their most effective in securing improvements in the teaching of English and mathematics in key stage 2.  Senior leaders have devised plans that contain appropriate actions for bringing about improvements in the school. However, leaders acknowledge that they are not precise enough about how they will measure whether their actions are working.  Leaders of subjects other than English and mathematics do not have a systematic approach to assessing and tracking pupils’ progress. Consequently, they do not have a clear picture of standards in these subjects.  The curriculum is broad and balanced, and contributes well to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. It also promotes fundamental British values well. As well as national curriculum subjects, there are lessons in religious education and

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

personal, social and health education. These contribute well to pupils’ understanding of, for example, other faiths. A programme of visits from, for instance, a local magistrate effectively promotes pupils’ understanding of the rule of law.  There is a wide range of extra-curricular clubs that enhance pupils’ social and spiritual development well. These include football, netball, chess and recorder clubs.  School leaders make effective use of the funding for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. They provide extra help through, for example, one-to-one support or extra work in small groups. The headteacher is also the special educational needs coordinator. She manages the provision of support well. These pupils make good progress from their starting points, as a result.  Leaders make effective use of the pupil premium funding. They help pupils to overcome barriers to their learning in various ways. For instance, leaders provide

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

individual tuition to help pupils with their learning in English and mathematics. They also provide support for pupils who have social and emotional needs. The current pupils in this group make good progress.  Leaders use the primary school physical education and sports funding effectively. They have provided an increasing number of opportunities for pupils to take part in sports competitions, such as rugby and tennis. Leaders have also improved teachers’ skills by providing specialist coaches to work alongside them. As a result of the activities provided by the school, some pupils have been inspired to join sports clubs outside school, such as gymnastics.  The local authority provides effective support to the school. The adviser has a good understanding of the school’s context and knows its strengths and areas for development.  The large majority of parents have a very positive view about the school. In

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

conversation with the lead inspector or in response to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View, they typically commented that the school has a ‘family feel’, the headteacher has ‘energy and enthusiasm’ and their children are ‘well looked after’.

p.4

Governance of the school

 The governance of the school is effective.  Governors are supportive and are actively involved in the work of the school. They have a clear awareness of its strengths and weaknesses. However, the governors’ view of the quality of teaching is slightly more optimistic than pupils’ achievement would suggest.  The governing body has received appropriate training, including regular safeguarding training. At least three governors are trained in safer recruitment.  Governors say that they challenge leaders strongly. While the minutes of governing body meetings do record governors’ questions, they currently lack incisiveness in their level of challenge.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The school’s systems for checking on the suitability of staff whom leaders employ are appropriate and thorough.  The school has a strong culture of safeguarding. Staff have a very good knowledge of what to do if they have a concern about a pupil. Pupils all say that they feel safe in school. They talk confidently about how to stay safe, such as when they are on the internet, because staff give them the relevant information. Parents say that staff communicate with them well. The school premises are secure and staff check visitors’ credentials thoroughly before they enter the building.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching, learning and assessment are inconsistent in quality.  Although teaching in key stage 2 produces mainly good progress among pupils in English and mathematics, in key stage 1 progress is more varied. Overall, in key stage 1, teachers do not use learning time productively enough because they do not consistently plan work that provides the right degree of demand for different ability groups.  Some teachers do not consistently provide work that develops, consolidates and deepens pupils’ knowledge, understanding and skills. This was not only evident in English and mathematics in key stage 1, but it was also clear from work across subjects other than these. For example, in key stage 1 geography, Year 1 and Year 2 books showed pupils in both year groups doing the same work on oceans and continents. Added to this, there was scant evidence of pupils making good progress in history or geography in Year 3.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teachers sometimes provide work that challenges the most able pupils in English and mathematics, but this is less evident in key stage 1. In English in Year 2, for example, the level of demand of the work varies, with the most able pupils sometimes doing the same work as middle-ability pupils. In subjects other than English and mathematics, most-able pupils typically have the same work as other pupils, although the quality and quantity of their work are noticeably better.  Some teachers apply the school’s marking and assessment policy inconsistently. However, this is not so much the case in English and mathematics. Where there is inconsistency, it means that there are times when pupils do not learn from their mistakes or know what the next steps in their learning are.  Teachers provide most pupils with opportunities to use their writing skills in other subjects. For example, pupils write about aspects of Islam in religious education and

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

they write reports in science. There are also some opportunities for pupils to use their mathematical knowledge, such as counting and recording heartbeats per minute, in a science investigation. In key stage 1, however, there are times when most-able pupils do not produce writing in, say, science that is as good as their writing in English.  Most pupils show good attitudes to their learning. Teachers establish good relationships with them and expect good behaviour. This has resulted in pupils making good progress in English and mathematics in key stage 2 and some groups of pupils, such as disadvantaged pupils, in key stage 1.  Where teachers plan well, they use their good subject knowledge to produce lessons that sustain pupils’ interest and make them think hard. In mathematics in Year 4, for example, pupils enjoyed solving problems in which they had to answer different calculations that provided the key to unlocking a code. In Year 6 English, pupils

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

watched a stimulating video that led to challenging work that required them to make predictions and justify their opinions.  Teachers set appropriate homework that supports the work that pupils do in school. According to the parents who spoke with the lead inspector, there is a variety of interesting tasks and most pupils respond well to these tasks.  Teachers keep parents well informed about their children’s progress. They provide formal parents evenings and end-of-year reports for each pupil. Teachers also communicate frequently with parents through pupils’ homework record books. Parents who spoke with the lead inspector said that the school ‘sees parents as partners’.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 Leaders work to promote pupils’ personal development, and welfare is good.  Pupils receive helpful information from staff that gives them the understanding about how to stay safe. For example, staff teach them how to stay safe on the internet and how to avoid harm when playing near water.  Pupils understand the different forms of bullying that exist, including cyber and homophobic bullying. They say that there are very few examples in school. Pupils know that teachers will address any bullying issues promptly and effectively.  Most pupils demonstrate positive attitudes to their learning. They appreciate the clubs and educational visits that leaders provide to make their learning more exciting.  Pupils have opportunities to develop a sense of responsibility through membership of the school council. Pupils also participate in the school’s ‘buddies’ system, where older pupils look after their assigned younger pupils at various points in the day.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils’ conduct around school is good. They show good manners to adults and to each other.  Pupils are confident enough to approach trusted adults and speak to them appropriately. They felt secure enough to greet inspectors politely and pleasantly, and were happy to discuss their work when asked.  Pupils’ behaviour in class is mostly good. Sometimes pupils misbehave; however, adults have effective strategies for managing behaviour. Consequently, pupils lose very little learning time.  Pupils play well together on the playground, showing consideration for each other. They enjoy playing with the equipment provided, such as skipping ropes and balls. Adults on duty supervise them well and make sure that pupils are safe.  Attendance is good. The large majority of groups of pupils have attendance rates above the national average.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Current pupils do not make consistently strong progress in key stage 1 in English and mathematics. In a wide range of other subjects, pupils across the school make variable progress.  There is evidence of good progress in English and mathematics for most pupils in key stage 2 and particular groups of pupils in key stage 1, such as disadvantaged pupils. However, there is a wider lack of consistency in subjects other than English and mathematics. For example, pupils do not gain enough knowledge, skills and understanding in science in key stage 1. However, pupils in all year groups make good progress in developing their art skills.  The most able pupils do not consistently do work that is challenging. There was evidence of work that stretched pupils in mathematics in key stage 2. However, in other subjects such as science in key stage 1, the most able did not have to attempt work that was any more demanding than that of other pupils.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Most pupils read well and do so for pleasure. The most able pupils read fluently and show good comprehension skills. The least able pupils can mostly use their knowledge of phonics to tackle unfamiliar words, but sometimes they can be unsure of how to approach such words.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress from their starting points. This is because of the effective support that leaders have put in place. For example, pupils in Year 3 progress from producing writing that is poorly spelled and hard to read, to clearly written sentences with reasonable attempts at spelling, such as ‘The boys had to colect (collect) fire wud (wood)’.  Disadvantaged pupils make good progress. This is because leaders have provided effective support, such as one-to-one tuition. This has helped this group to improve their skills in English and mathematics.  The most recent published assessment information showed that the proportion of Year

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

1 pupils reaching the expected standard in the phonics check was above the national average. Leaders anticipate that the proportion this year will be smaller. However, a higher proportion of pupils in the cohort than last year have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Nevertheless, leaders still expect about three quarters of pupils to reach the expected standard.  Achievement in mathematics by the end of Year 6 in 2016 was close to or above the national average. From all starting points, progress was in line with the national average and the attainment of some groups was significantly above.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Children enter the Reception Year with knowledge and skills that are broadly typical for their age and stage of development. Typically, a large majority have the skills that they need for Year 1 by the time they leave the early years. Current children are making good progress from their starting points.  The early years leader is effective and has identified the strengths and areas for development in the Reception class. She has brought in more systematic observation and assessment of children’s progress, and she has improved the teaching of phonics. The effectiveness of these improvements is evident in the good progress that current children make.  Staff plan interesting and engaging activities for children. The quality of teaching is good. For example, children show good reading skills when they are working with the class teacher. They use their phonics skills well to read challenging sentences, such as

p.7

Early years provision Good

‘I will turn off the tap when I brush my teeth’. They show good coordination and creativity as they enthusiastically paint pictures of planets and space rockets. Staff make effective use of the limited outdoor space to provide a range of activities that enable children to develop, for example, physical skills.  Disadvantaged children make good progress, because leaders use the pupil premium funding effectively. They provide children with effective support for their learning of basic English and mathematical skills, as well as for their social and emotional needs.  Children in the early years show that they are safe by their good behaviour and their attitudes to their learning. They are cooperative with other each other. They show confidence in their relationships with adults. They were even confident enough to greet the lead inspector and ask why he was in their class.  Early years staff have a good partnership with parents. They involve them in their

p.7

Early years provision Good

child’s progress and development throughout their time in the Reception class. Staff invite parents to events, such as ‘stay and play’, before their child starts and they keep them up to date as their child progresses through ‘home/school’ books. There are formal parents’ evenings every term and staff keep informal communication channels open throughout the year.  Staff ensure that children’s transition into the Reception Year is smooth. They are equally careful to provide a smooth transition into Year 1. Staff ensure that Reception- age children have experience of Year 1 activities at the end of their Reception Year. The early years lead makes sure that the Year 1 teacher has a clear understanding of the needs of the children.  Safeguarding in the early years is effective, as it is part of the whole-school safeguarding procedures. There are no breaches of the welfare requirements.  While teaching in the early years is good, sometimes the quality of questioning from

p.8

Early years provision Good

teaching assistants can be undemanding. This means that there are occasional opportunities missed to deepen children’s understanding.  There are some links with local private pre-school providers that involve sharing relevant information, but leaders do not systematically look at assessment processes across the settings. Leaders recognise this and plan to develop appropriate processes in the next school year.

p.8

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.9

School details

Email address head@anderton.lancs.sch.uk

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 12–13 March 2013

p.9

Information about this school

 The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The school is smaller than an average-sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils who receive support in school for their special educational needs and/or disabilities is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who have an education, health and care plan or a statement of special educational needs is slightly above the national average.  The proportion of pupils who are supported through pupil premium funding is roughly half the national average.  The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is well below the national average, as is the proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language.  The proportion of pupils who leave or join the school at times other than the start of the Reception Year is below the national average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum

p.9

Information about this school

expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress by the end of Year 6.

p.10

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors carried out observations of learning in all year groups. Some of these were joint observations with the headteacher and members of the inspection team. The headteacher was also present at inspection team meetings.  A range of documentation was scrutinised, including the school’s self-evaluation summary, action plans for school improvement, records of the monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning, minutes of meetings of the governing body and records connected with safeguarding children.  Inspectors held discussions with various stakeholders, including the headteacher and other senior leaders, subject leaders, other members of staff, governors, a representative from the local authority, parents and pupils.  Inspectors listened to pupils read and analysed pupils’ work in writing and mathematics, as well as their work in other subjects. They also looked at the work of children in the early years.

p.11

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors evaluated 52 responses received through Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey. There were no other survey responses.

p.11

Inspection team

Mark Quinn, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.11

Inspection team

Neil Dixon, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.12

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion