Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Christ Church CofE Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
4 Jul 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Sims
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SY5 6DH
- Name on report verified
Christ Church CofE Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,229
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Tracey Cansdale Acting Headteacher Christ Church CofE Primary School Sheinton Road Cressage Shrewsbury Shropshire SY5 6DH
p.1
Short inspection of Christ Church CofE Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 4 July 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Christ Church CofE Primary School
As a result of your determined and highly committed leadership the school has maintained the good quality of education since the last inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of Christ Church CofE Primary School
You have continued to secure good outcomes for pupils which by the end of Year 6 exceed national expectations in reading, writing and mathematics. Outcomes in early years are improving rapidly. Teaching remains strong. Governors and leaders have ensured stability and future sustainability for the school during a time of significant changes in leadership. You and governors are clear about why the school is not yet outstanding and what needs to be done to secure further improvements.
p.1
Short inspection of Christ Church CofE Primary School
Parents are overwhelmingly positive about the leadership of the school. Almost all who responded said they would recommend the school to another parent. The ethos of the school, which is rooted in its Christian values, underpins every aspect of school life. However there is more to do to develop pupils’ understanding and experience of cultural diversity in the United Kingdom. Pupils said it is a very caring school. In mixed-age classes pupils often receive bespoke provision according to their individual needs. The school recognises that attendance of the very small numbers of disadvantaged pupils or those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is improving too slowly.
p.1
Short inspection of Christ Church CofE Primary School
At the time of the school’s last inspection in 2013, inspectors reported that more teaching should be outstanding and that pupils’ progress should improve across Years 3 to 6 in mathematics. You have maintained the good quality of teaching and improved the teaching of mathematics so that outcomes are now rapidly improving by the end of Year 6. You are aware that not enough pupils go on to achieve higher standards in reading and mathematics or are working in greater depth in writing.
p.1
Short inspection of Christ Church CofE Primary School
Leaders make sure that safeguarding is their number-one priority, however busy they may be. They ensure that staff are well trained and fully up-to-date with the latest information and guidance. All staff are encouraged to adopt a culture of vigilance in looking out for the well-being of pupils, including those who may have medical needs. Pupils spoken to during the inspection said that they feel very safe. Detailed records of concerns are kept and referrals to other agencies are carried out promptly. Governors have a wealth of knowledge about most aspects of safeguarding that they use to ensure that leaders meet their statutory requirements. However, leaders’ monitoring and analysis of behaviour incidents is not rigorous enough to allow governors to evaluate any emerging trends or patterns.
p.2
Inspection findings
Teachers are adept at teaching mixed-aged classes. They make sure that work is suitably challenging for different groups of pupils given their various starting points. They deploy additional adults well so that most pupils, including those at risk of falling behind, are making at least expected progress. According to the school’s recent survey of pupils, they were highly positive about the changes introduced in mathematics that enable them to problem-solve and work in greater depth. Outcomes at the end of Year 6 for current pupils in reading, writing, mathematics and English grammar, punctuation and spelling all compare favourably with standards nationally. There has been an increase in the proportion of most-able pupils reaching higher standards in reading and working in greater depth in writing. However, there are still no pupils working at greater depth in reading, writing and mathematics combined by the end of Year 6. The proportion of
p.2
Inspection findings
higher-attaining boys working at a greater depth in writing across the school remains low. Outcomes for boys in writing across the school have improved since last year’s tests and assessments. The school has worked well with Shrewsbury Town Football Club as a means of enthusing more boys in their writing. Almost all pupils have met the phonics standards for the end of Year 1 this year, including all boys in the cohort. Outcomes in early years have continued to improve each year from a low base in 2014. This year’s outcomes are well above national expectations, including in writing, physical development and personal, social and emotional development. There are too few boys in Reception to evaluate their outcomes in 2017. The outdoors physical environment has been significantly enhanced. Both inside and outside areas have clear learning zones which promote literacy and numeracy. Leaders also provide opportunities for creative development and science, for
p.2
Inspection findings
example investigating which materials melt in the sun and which do not. The outside area has been designed with a view to engaging the interest of boys more in physical activities and to develop their self-confidence. Opportunities for using computers and technology in the early years are very limited however. Most of the very small numbers of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are doing well in their learning, including in writing. Where they are not, leaders have identified the individual pupils who are in danger of falling behind, and have put in place further measures to help them to catch up. Pupils enjoy their learning and those spoken to were especially keen on art and physical education. Pupils behave well in and around school. Pupils reported that behaviour was good and they welcomed the role of pupil peer mediators, who help to resolve any arguments or disputes between pupils. The previously high
p.3
Inspection findings
proportion of permanent and fixed-term exclusions has been significantly reduced. Even so, leaders’ recording of behaviour incidents is not yet analytical enough to enable governors to know whether any patterns or trends are emerging. The rate of pupil attendance has been maintained at above average compared to national figures. The attendance of the very small numbers of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is still below average, and is not improving quickly enough. Strategies adopted to promote better attendance for these pupils have had limited effect. Pupils’ understanding and experience of cultural diversity in the United Kingdom is very limited, particularly regarding the major faiths that are represented, other than Christianity. The website does not meet the Department for Education (DfE) requirements for information the school should publish on key stage 2 results, curriculum content
p.3
Inspection findings
for each year group, its accessibility plan and governance.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
more pupils in each year group, including boys, from the start of key stage 1 onwards are working at higher standards in reading and mathematics and in greater depth in writing the attendance of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is improving more rapidly the records of behaviour incidents are analysed with more rigour by senior leaders pupils have more experience and understanding of cultural diversity in the United Kingdom the website meets the DfE requirements for information the school should publish. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Hereford and the director of children’s services for Shropshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection I met the acting headteacher and other members of staff. I also held discussions with five members of the governing body, including the newly appointed chair and the former chair. I also met a representative from the local authority. I visited parts of three lessons, which I observed jointly with the acting headteacher. I also observed pupils as they moved around the school. I met with a group of pupils. I scrutinised the school’s self-evaluation, pupil performance information and safeguarding and child protection records. I analysed the 27 responses to the online Ofsted questionnaire, Parent View, and the 27 responses to Parent View free text, and looked at a letter from a parent. There were no responses to pupil and staff surveys .
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion