Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Caldecott Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Jun 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Mo Galway
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
OX14 5HB
- Name on report verified
Caldecott Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,497
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Ms Katy Walsh Headteacher Caldecott Primary School Caldecott Road Abingdon Oxfordshire OX14 5HB
p.1
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 20 June 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You and other leaders have established a culture in which every person is valued and respected. You know the pupils and their families well, which enables you to provide targeted and specific support when required. You are committed to ensuring that the school is a great place to learn for your pupils.
p.1
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
You have provided diligent and determined leadership. Standards at the end of key stage 2 in 2016 had declined. You rightly focused your attention on the effectiveness of the teaching of both reading and mathematics. This is because the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard in Year 6 was well below the national average.
p.1
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
Your systematic and analytical approach to identifying school development priorities has ensured that all groups of pupils now make at least the progress that the school expects. The proportion of pupils across the school attaining the expected standard is increasing, as is the proportion reaching higher standards. The effectiveness of teaching has improved, particularly in reading and mathematics. Teachers question pupils well to probe their understanding and move their learning on. They create effective opportunities to deepen pupils’ learning and develop their skills.
p.1
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
The governors have, rightly, challenged you to ensure that improvement takes place so that pupils make the progress they should from their starting points. Pupils’ achievement in writing was identified as an area for improvement at the previous inspection. More pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, are attaining well in writing. Pupils’ handwriting and spelling have improved. Ensuring that the most able pupils are challenged in lessons was also identified as an area for improvement. These pupils are making good progress in reading, writing and mathematics. However, the most able are not sufficiently well-challenged in some of the foundation subjects.
p.1
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
Leaders have adapted the school’s assessment procedures in reading, writing and mathematics. Staff now accurately identify strengths and areas for improvement. Teachers use the assessment information well to identify gaps in learning and plan appropriate work to move pupils’ learning on. Leaders and teachers have started to assess pupils’ progress in other subjects, such as science and religious education. However, the school has not yet developed assessment procedures for the other subjects.
p.2
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
Persistent absence of those pupils entitled to free school meals and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities has been high. Leaders have taken effective action to increase the attendance of these groups. The family liaison outreach worker provides effective support and assistance to many families, to ensure that pupils are in school and learning.
p.2
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
The leadership team ensures that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. You keep detailed records and carefully track every staff concern and any involvement with outside agencies. Governors review your processes regularly to check that they are effective. They believe that safeguarding is ‘everybody’s responsibility’. Pupils feel safe and say that bullying is rare. Parents are satisfied with how the school cares for their children. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe, particularly when using the internet. Pupils behave sensibly around the school and in lessons. They are supervised well during break and lunchtimes, when they play happily. Staff who work in the breakfast club and after-school club provide effective provision and look after the pupils well.
p.2
Short inspection of Caldecott Primary School
Staff receive regular, useful training in safeguarding and a noticeboard in the staffroom displays up-to-date information to refer to. They discuss pupils’ safety in weekly staff meetings and leaders take swift action to follow up on any concerns raised by staff. Governors and staff have received training on keeping pupils safe from the dangers of radicalisation and extremism. Leaders work effectively with external agencies when needed. They carry out an annual audit of safeguarding and governors monitor any recommendations to improve the school’s practice carefully.
p.2
Inspection findings
We discussed the lines of enquiry together and agreed to focus on the following aspects: the effectiveness of leaders in creating a strong culture of safeguarding across the school to keep pupils safe; how well leaders have improved teaching so that the most able are sufficiently challenged; how effectively leaders ensure that pupils make the progress they should, particularly in reading and mathematics; how well the curriculum prepares pupils for their next steps in education and for life in modern Britain; and how well leaders have reduced persistent absence. Teachers have had high-quality training and support from the local authority and from leaders in the school. This has improved teaching, particularly in reading and in mathematics. The most able are now more challenged in lessons, as teachers plan more precisely for them. Pupils are regularly given opportunities to deepen their understanding and apply learning in different contexts. The most
p.2
Inspection findings
able are making good progress. For example, in a Year 6 reading lesson, the most able pupils found evidence to justify their opinions about different characters in the class text ‘Bubble Boy’. In a Year 3 mathematics lesson, the most able used their reasoning skills to find out if a statement was true or false. This is leading to a greater proportion of pupils achieving higher standards across the school. Although the most able are challenged in reading, writing and mathematics, further work is needed to ensure that they are sufficiently challenged in the other subjects. The majority of pupils now make the progress that the school expects in reading, writing and mathematics. There is no evidence that a dip in pupils’ achievement at the end of key stage 2 in 2016 is symptomatic of a decline. Leaders and governors monitor the progress of groups rigorously in order to identify areas needing improvement. As a result, quick and effective action is taken to address
p.3
Inspection findings
identified issues. Disadvantaged pupils make good progress across the school and differences are being diminished. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well. As a result, most are making good progress from their starting points. For example, pupils in Year 2 with low starting points are now writing accurate sentences and using appropriate punctuation. Boys are also making good progress, which has led to a greater proportion of them attaining the expected standards. For example, boys are reading more complex books well, due to the introduction of whole-class texts and reading sessions. Leaders’ actions have led to improvements in the teaching of phonics. Consequently, this year’s results are closer to those seen nationally. The curriculum is broad, with a range of topics which pupils enjoy. The music curriculum is strong, offering pupils the opportunity to learn both the recorder
p.3
Inspection findings
and the keyboard. Different learning opportunities such as trips, visitors, drama workshops and musical events enrich the curriculum well. Leaders have recently developed assessment systems for science and religious education, however other subjects are not currently assessed. Consequently, leaders do not know how well different groups of pupils, such as the most able, are achieving across the curriculum. Diversity is celebrated in the religious education curriculum and through topics focusing on Ghana and Brazil. Pupils develop their understanding of spiritual, moral, social and cultural aspects in lessons and other activities. For example, special assemblies are led by pupils who speak English as an additional language, where they share aspects of their culture. ‘Camo’ day is celebrated annually, where children have the opportunity to learn about careers within the armed forces. Pupils develop five learning skills: resilience, resourcefulness, respect,
p.3
Inspection findings
responsibility and reflectiveness, which help them to tackle new learning well. They respect each other, listen carefully to each other’s ideas and work and play happily together. Pupils are prepared well for life in modern Britain and are developing their understanding of British values. Pupil outcomes this year show that they are making good progress in their learning and are well prepared for the next stage in their education. Leaders have taken rigorous action to address weaknesses in attendance. For example, the use of contracts has helped parents to ensure their children are in school. Governors monitor attendance well to check that leaders are taking effective steps to address concerns. As a result, persistent absence is declining, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and for those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.4
Next steps for the school
the most able pupils are sufficiently challenged across the wider curriculum assessment systems to track the progress that pupils make in the foundation subjects are developed further.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Oxfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
I met with you, other leaders, pupils and members of the governing body and spoke to a representative of the local authority on the telephone. With you and your deputy, I visited all classes. I also scrutinised a wide range of pupils’ work with your subject leaders. I took account of 25 staff responses to the online questionnaire and considered 45 responses by parents to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 19 free-text comments. I observed pupils’ behaviour at break and around the school and spoke to a number of parents at the beginning of the school day. I analysed a range of the school’s documentation including information about pupils’ achievement, attendance information, the school development plan and a range of policies and procedures including those for safeguarding. We discussed your own evaluation of the school’s effectiveness.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion