Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Independent school inspection

Manchester Jewish School for Special Education

Inspected 22 Jun 2017 · published 4 Sept 2017 · URN 135027

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jean Olsson-Law

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Jun 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Jean Olsson-Law

  • Postcode verified

    M7 4QY

  • Name on report verified

    Manchester Jewish School for Special Education

  • URN verified

    135027

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−0Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelypositiveoutstandingeffectiveindependentconsistentlysafesuccessfully
Criticismconcernsnot metweaknessesnot yetseriousnot effectivelynot effectiveweak

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings2528w−2
  • What needs to improve63w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,506
longer than usual (typical 1813)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 49
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

School progress monitoring inspection report

p.1

Manchester Jewish School for Special Education Manchester Jewish Community Centre, Bury Old Road, Manchester M7 4QY

p.1

Main inspection findings

Part 1. Quality of education provided Paragraph 2(1), 2(1)(a), 2(1)(b), 2(1)(b)(i)  This standard remains unmet.  At the previous inspection, the standard was unmet because curriculum plans and schemes of work did not contain enough detail to ensure that teachers were able to teach effectively. Teachers did not cover the range of secular subjects fully and study programmes for learners over the age of 16 were limited. The schemes of work did not take into account the ages, aptitudes and needs of all pupils, including those with an education, health and care plan.  The action plan submitted to the Department for Education (DfE) did not provide enough detail to guarantee that the actions proposed would be successfully implemented. There was no indication of how staff would be expected to deliver the schemes of work.  Leaders have produced a draft curriculum policy. This has been updated to meet the

p.1

Main inspection findings

independent school standards. However, the schemes of work have not yet been completed in line with the timescale proposed in the action plan. Leaders are drawing on the support of external advisers and expertise from an outstanding special school in Oldham to assist with the schemes of work. They have set a realistic timescale for full implementation of new schemes of work at the start of the next academic year.  The action plan still does not include details of how leaders will ensure that schemes of work are implemented effectively and how teaching will take full account of the ages, aptitudes and needs of all pupils.  Study programmes for learners over 16 are being reviewed and some positive changes have been made. Leaders are now ensuring that learners over the age of 16 can take accredited qualifications within their capability. Where appropriate, they are teaching GCSE courses in English and mathematics and ASDAN courses to develop learners’

p.1

Main inspection findings

personal and employability skills. Paragraphs 2(2)(d)(ii)  This standard remains unmet.  At the previous inspection, the standard was unmet because pupils were not given sufficient opportunities to broaden their understanding of differences between people based on their culture, religion, gender, gender identity and sexual orientation.  The action plan submitted to the DfE did not show how leaders would check and evaluate that pupils gained an understanding of such differences.  Leaders have plans to promote pupils’ understanding and respect for people with protected characteristics appropriate to their ability, but these plans have not yet been implemented.  Pupils receive effective education in other aspects of personal, social and health development through the social and emotional aspects of learning programme and in religious studies. Pupils show respect for each other and everyone in school. Sex and

p.1

Main inspection findings

relationships education has been introduced for older pupils. Paragraph 2(2)(e), 2(2)(e)(i), 2(2)(e)(ii) and 2(2)(e)(iii)  This standard is now met.  At the previous inspection, the standard was unmet because learners over the age of 16 did not have access to independent, impartial careers advice and guidance. They did not have appropriate work experience placements and were not able to make informed choices about their career options.  The action plan submitted to the DfE did not explain how the success of actions to improve careers education would be measured or the cost implications to the school.  Leaders and governors acted quickly to employ an impartial careers adviser to work with learners. They have also developed links with a local employment agency that serves Manchester’s Jewish community. Each learner has received personalised advice and guidance.  Learners are now receiving support to develop relevant work-related skills in lessons. For

p.2

Main inspection findings

example, they have been supported to write and submit their curriculum vitae. Where appropriate, learners have been provided with work experience that enables them to develop their skills. Learners are very positive about the improvements made to this aspect of their education. They feel that their aspirations are supported well. Paragraph 3, 3(a), 3(c)  This standard remains unmet.  At the previous inspection, the standard was unmet because the quality of teaching in subjects such as English, mathematics, history, science and geography was too varied. Teaching did not develop pupils’ ability to read, write, speak, listen and understand mathematics sufficiently. Assessment was not used effectively to build on previous learning and identify next steps in learning. Some teaching did not engage pupils’ interest and work was not matched well to their different starting points and abilities.  The action plan submitted to the DfE did not explain what leaders would do to improve

p.2

Main inspection findings

teaching or how they would evaluate the quality and impact of teaching.  Leaders have not addressed the issues raised in the evaluation of the action plan. They have not considered fully how the improvements in teaching will be brought about and the curriculum is not yet developed sufficiently to provide breadth and depth in learning in secular subjects.  Pupils still do not have sufficient opportunities to apply their learning in varied activities and different contexts. Many pupils need to repeat learning in order to consolidate what they know. However, the activities provided for them to do this are not varied or stimulating enough to help them to deepen their knowledge and develop their skills further.  Resources are not used as effectively as they could be in some classes to provide pupils with further support and add interest to their learning. Teaching assistants and additional adults are not routinely deployed to make the best use of their skills.

p.2

Main inspection findings

 Some improvements to teaching and learning have been secured. The books of younger pupils show more breadth in the subjects being covered than was reported by the previous inspection. Younger pupils are now being provided with more opportunities to write and apply their knowledge.  Leaders have introduced a more effective approach to assessment. They are using a new system to chart pupils’ small steps in learning and to ensure that their learning targets are revised appropriately. This is being used consistently by teachers and is having a positive effect on pupils’ progress.  Leaders are seeking out external support to improve teaching. There is also some effective practice within the school that could be shared, for example in the deployment of teaching assistants and in the use of resources. Although the work to improve teaching is at early stages, leaders are starting to build capacity to secure the necessary

p.3

Main inspection findings

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraph 7, 7(a), 7(b)  This standard is now met.  The standard was unmet at the previous inspection because leaders were unaware of the most recent statutory requirements for keeping children safe. The safeguarding policy did not have regard to guidance on keeping children safe in education. The school’s policy and practice for preventing radicalisation were underdeveloped and staff had not had training in this area. The school’s records of safeguarding concerns and behaviour were not sufficiently robust.  The action plan submitted to the DfE did not indicate how staff would be made aware of their responsibilities.  Leaders and governors have acted quickly to update their knowledge and understanding of safeguarding issues and legislation. The safeguarding policy has been updated and now complies with requirements.  Leaders have ensured that staff have had safeguarding training appropriate to their roles

p.3

Main inspection findings

and responsibilities and the designated lead for safeguarding has undertaken enhanced training. All staff have read and affirmed their understanding of the latest guidance outlined in Part 1 of ‘Keeping children safe in education’.  Further training is currently being undertaken in the ‘Prevent’ duty. An external adviser is working with staff to develop their skills in supporting pupils to understand risks associated with extremist views and radicalisation.  Leaders have ensured that more robust records are kept of any safeguarding or behavioural concerns. They have engaged appropriately with outside agencies.  The school has commissioned a safeguarding audit from Manchester local authority. This thorough audit has supported leaders to ensure that all requirements are now met. It provides a useful framework for further checks.  A complaint made to the DfE also raised some concerns about the well-being of pupils.

p.3

Main inspection findings

During this inspection, there was no evidence to uphold the concerns detailed in the complaint. Pupils are happy, and say that they feel safe and that adults care for them well. Staff do all they can to make sure that pupils are safe and secure. Staff have positive relationships with the pupils. Pupils behave with consideration towards each other. Paragraph 9, 9(c)  This standard is now met.  The standard was unmet at the previous inspection because leaders had not set out the sanctions that were to be used in the event of pupils’ misbehaviour. The school’s anti- bullying policy did not contain sufficient detail, for example regarding prejudice-based bullying.  The action plan submitted to the DfE did not indicate how consistency of expectation for behaviour would be ensured or how the impact of sanctions would be monitored.  All classes now keep a behaviour log that includes a record of any sanctions used and

p.4

Main inspection findings

their effect. Teachers have been provided with clear guidance on what sanctions can be used, in what circumstances, and how they should be recorded. The focus in the school’s behaviour policy is on preventative strategies and the reinforcement of positive behaviour. Staff and pupils uphold the policy successfully and serious misbehaviour is extremely rare. The behaviour and anti-bullying policies are in the process of being updated. Paragraph 14  This standard continues to be met.  The DfE commissioned a review of the standard relating to the supervision of pupils following the complaint that was made after the previous inspection.  There are suitable levels of staffing, including individualised support for most pupils. Staff are deployed effectively to support pupils’ special educational needs and disabilities and ensure their welfare. There was no evidence to suggest that pupils are not properly

p.4

Main inspection findings

supervised. Paragraph 15  This standard is now met.  The previous inspection found this standard to be unmet because the school’s admission register did not contain all the required details and pupils’ attendance was not analysed systematically.  The admission and attendance registers are now maintained as required by regulations. Part 6. Provision of information Paragraph 32(1), 32(1)(c)  This standard is now met.  The standard was not met at the previous inspection because the school did not have a compliant safeguarding policy.  The safeguarding policy is now compliant and is provided for parents on request. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b)  This standard remains unmet.  The standard was not met at the previous inspection because leaders were not aware of the independent school standards. They did not have sufficient knowledge and skills to

p.4

Main inspection findings

ensure that they were all met. The procedures to check on and improve teaching were not effective and planning for school improvement was weak.  Leaders are now fully aware of the independent school standards and the statutory requirements. Leaders have a better understanding of what they need to do to meet them. They have tackled the weaknesses in careers education and safeguarding and ensure that pupils are safe and secure. However, several standards remain unmet.  School improvement planning lacks clarity about how improvements to the curriculum and teaching and learning will be secured. Improvement plans do not yet explain how leaders will measure the success of their actions. The school’s action plan to address the weaknesses has not been revised since it was submitted to the DfE.  Leaders have a lot of relevant information about the quality of teaching and learning based on their observations of teaching and checks on pupils’ progress. However, they

p.5

Main inspection findings

are not using this information effectively to analyse strengths and weaknesses in teaching and to identify what needs to be done to improve teaching further.  The procedures to manage teachers’ performance do not take sufficient account of the information from leaders’ checks on teaching and pupils’ progress. Teachers are not provided with performance targets that would improve their teaching or develop their roles.  Leaders, governors and the trust board are drawing on external support and advice effectively. They have commissioned an audit of their safeguarding procedures from Manchester local authority. This has helped to ensure that all safeguarding requirements are now met. They have employed external consultants to support curriculum development and improvements in teaching and learning. Leaders are seeking out support from an outstanding special school in the development of monitoring and evaluation and planning for improvement. The impact of support from consultants and

p.5

Main inspection findings

school partnerships is at very early stages but it is adding expertise and capacity to secure further improvements to leadership.

p.5

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.

p.6

The school does not meet the following independent school standards

Standards that were not met at the previous inspection and remain unmet at this inspection  The proprietor ensures that a written policy on the curriculum, supported by appropriate plans and schemes of work, which provides for the matters specified in sub-paragraph (2) is drawn up and implemented effectively; and the written policy, plans and schemes of work take into account the ages, aptitudes and needs of all pupils, including those pupils with an education, health and care plan; and encourages respect for other people, paying particular regard to the protected characteristics set out in the 2010 Act (paragraphs 2(1), 2(1)(a), 2(1)(b), 2(1)(b)(i), 2(2)(d)(ii)).  The proprietor must ensure that the teaching at the school enables pupils to acquire new knowledge and make good progress according to their ability so that they increase their understanding and develop their skills in the subjects taught; involves well-planned

p.6

The school does not meet the following independent school standards

lessons and effective teaching methods, activities and management of class time (paragraphs 3, 3(a), 3(c)).  The proprietor must ensure that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently (paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b)).

p.6

The school now meets the following independent school standards

 The proprietor must ensure for pupils receiving secondary education, access to accurate, up-to-date careers guidance that is presented in an impartial manner; enables them to make informed choices about a broad range of career options; and helps to encourage them to fulfil their potential (paragraphs 2(2)(e), 2(2)(e)(i), 2(2)(e)(ii) and 2(2)(e)(iii)).  The proprietor must ensure that arrangements to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State (paragraphs 7, 7(b)).  The proprietor must promote good behaviour among pupils by ensuring that a record is kept of the sanctions imposed upon pupils for serious misbehaviour (paragraphs 9, 9(c)).  The proprietor must ensure that an admission and attendance register is maintained in accordance with the Education (Pupil Registration) (England) Regulations 2006 (paragraph 15).  The proprietor must ensure that particulars of the arrangements for meeting the standard

p.6

The school now meets the following independent school standards

contained in paragraph 7 are published on the school’s internet website or, where no such website exists, are provided to parents on request (paragraphs 32(1), 32(1)(c)).

p.6

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.7

School details

Type of school Independent special school

p.7

School details

School status Independent special school

p.7

School details

Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed

p.7

School details

Of which, number on roll in sixth form 3

p.7

School details

Date of previous standard inspection 8–10 November 2016

p.7

Information about this school

 The Manchester Jewish School for Special Education is housed in a Jewish community centre in north Manchester. It is owned by a charity that also operates under the name of T’mimei Lev. It has a trust board with three members, including the chair of governors.  The vast majority of pupils have an education, health and care plan or a statement of special educational needs. Most pupils have moderate learning difficulties and some have more complex needs.  Torah Tots nursery operates from the same building and is led by the same headteacher and board of trustees. The nursery is inspected separately and the most recent report can be found on the Ofsted website.  The school is registered for pupils aged from four years, although the youngest currently in school are aged eight.  The school is registered for boys and girls although at the time of the inspection all 16 pupils on roll were boys.  Pupils attend for four and a half days a week. The school also offers after-school facilities

p.7

Information about this school

each evening and Sunday mornings.  The school’s action plan was evaluated on 6 March 2017 and was judged not to be acceptable.  This was the first monitoring inspection of the school to check on its progress in meeting the independent school standards that were judged to be unmet in the inspection in November 2016.  This inspection was undertaken without notice to the school.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards and other requirements that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection.  This was the school’s first monitoring inspection and was conducted at no notice to the school.  The inspector also considered standards relating to a complaint that had been made to the DfE.  The inspector met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher and two external advisers. She met with a group of pupils aged 16 and over and spoke with other pupils during lessons.  The inspector observed teaching and learning and sampled pupils’ work in classes.  The inspector looked at a range of documentary evidence, including the school’s improvement plans, pupil progress tracking, assessment information, performance

p.9

Information about this inspection

management, monitoring of teaching, and admission and attendance registers. She also looked at a range of safeguarding documents including behaviour logs, case studies, the single central record and the safeguarding policy.

p.9

Inspection team

Jean Olsson-Law, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visitwww.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion