Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Little Bloomers Day Nursery and Pre School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Kathleen Anne Bloomfield
- Group reference verified
RP909753
- Inspection date verified
2 Aug 2017
- Inspectors verified
Alexandra Brouder
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
LE15 7BL
- Name on report verified
Little Bloomers Day Nursery and Pre School
- URN verified
EY432811
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They have formed warm, caring relationships with staff and show secure emotional attachments. p.1
- Staff do not make accurate assessments of children's learning and progress to provide effective support and challenge to enable every child to make good progress. p.1
- That said, children are happy and enjoy playing with the range of resources and activities on offer. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Self-evaluation is not good enough to help the manager and her team to identify any weaknesses in the provision or to help drive improvement. p.1
- Many areas within the nursery are cluttered and poorly maintained. p.4
- Self- evaluation is weak and does not identify areas for improvement. p.4
- The quality of teaching overall is poor. p.4
- Staff fail to recognise when children are ready to move on to the next stage of their learning. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure younger children are supervised and monitored more effectively in the outdoor area to ensure their safety 03/08/2017 p.2
- ensure that risk assessments are completed and all reasonable steps to remove, minimise and manage risks are taken, with particular regard to risks associated with children gaining access to the ground floor bathroom and laundry room. 16/08/2017 p.2
- act on information provided by parents and carers about a child's dietary needs 09/08/2017 p.2
- ensure that children engage in good hygiene practices, in order to prevent the spread of infection 09/08/2017 p.2
- make regular and precise assessments of children's learning and use the information gained to plan suitably challenging activities to help all children make good progress 02/10/2017 p.2
- improve the quality and consistency of teaching, ensuring that staff have the appropriate skills to plan and deliver challenging and enjoyable learning experiences that take into account children's interests and stage of development 02/10/2017 p.2
- develop the partnership with parents and carers so they are actively involved in establishing the starting points for children's learning and are well supported to guide their children's learning at home. 30/08/2017 p.2
- strengthen self-evaluation to ensure that it accurately identifies significant weaknesses to improve the quality of the nursery and outcomes for children. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety10
“Risk assessments are not robust.” p.1Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is ineffective.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,005
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Little Bloomers Day Nursery and Pre School H M Forces, Kendrew Barracks, Cottesmore, OAKHAM, Rutland, LE15 7BL
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 2 August 2017 7 September 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Staff do not supervise children well enough, particularly in the outdoor area. This leads to younger children being exposed to risks. Risk assessments are not robust. For example, household paints and chemicals are accessible to children in the bathroom and laundry room. Occasionally, good hygiene practices are not followed appropriately in the baby room to minimise the risk of cross-infection. Staff do not make accurate assessments of children's learning and progress to provide effective support and challenge to enable every child to make good progress. The manager does not identify weaknesses in the quality of teaching. She does not ensure that all staff have the appropriate skills to plan and deliver challenging and enjoyable learning experiences for children. Staff do not involve parents in establishing what children know, understand and can do. They do not always offer enough support to help parents to guide their child's learning
p.1
This provision is inadequate
at home. Occasionally, staff do not meet the individual needs of children who have identified allergies. For example, alternative food choices are not offered during mealtimes. Self-evaluation is not good enough to help the manager and her team to identify any weaknesses in the provision or to help drive improvement.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children are happy and settled. They have formed warm, caring relationships with staff and show secure emotional attachments.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure younger children are supervised and monitored more effectively in the outdoor area to ensure their safety 03/08/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that risk assessments are completed and all reasonable steps to remove, minimise and manage risks are taken, with particular regard to risks associated with children gaining access to the ground floor bathroom and laundry room. 16/08/2017
p.2
Due Date
act on information provided by parents and carers about a child's dietary needs 09/08/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that children engage in good hygiene practices, in order to prevent the spread of infection 09/08/2017
p.2
Due Date
make regular and precise assessments of children's learning and use the information gained to plan suitably challenging activities to help all children make good progress 02/10/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the quality and consistency of teaching, ensuring that staff have the appropriate skills to plan and deliver challenging and enjoyable learning experiences that take into account children's interests and stage of development 02/10/2017
p.2
Due Date
develop the partnership with parents and carers so they are actively involved in establishing the starting points for children's learning and are well supported to guide their children's learning at home. 30/08/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
strengthen self-evaluation to ensure that it accurately identifies significant weaknesses to improve the quality of the nursery and outcomes for children.
p.2
Inspection activities
This inspection was carried out as part of a risk assessment process, following information received by Ofsted. The inspectors observed the quality of teaching during activities inside and outside, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspectors spoke with staff, children and parents during the inspection and took account of their views. The inspectors completed two joint observations with one of the deputy managers. The inspectors held meetings with the manager and one of her deputies. They looked at relevant documentation, such as staff qualifications and the evidence of suitability of all those working with children.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. Although staff are adequately deployed and required staff-to- child ratios are met, staff do not supervise younger children to ensure their safety outdoors. For example, younger children run around with pencils in their hands and with small pieces of plastic in their mouths. Staff do not promptly intervene to ensure children's safety. Despite this, staff have a suitable knowledge of child protection matters and know how to refer concerns. Staff attend first-aid training and accident and medication records are maintained appropriately. Indoors, the manager and her team do not manage or identify risks effectively. Many areas within the nursery are cluttered and poorly maintained. Further to this, hazardous chemicals and household paints are stored within reach of children. Hygiene practices within the baby and toddler rooms are not consistently implemented. Children share face flannels at mealtimes. This means there is a
p.4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
risk of cross infection. Most staff are qualified. However, they do not observe, plan and assess children's learning effectively. The manager does not monitor the quality of teaching and staff practice in order to take effective action and address weaknesses. Self- evaluation is weak and does not identify areas for improvement. Staff do not involve parents in a two way dialogue to share information about what children know, understand and can do. They do not suggest ideas to help parents to guide their child's learning at home.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The quality of teaching overall is poor. For example, staff in the baby room do not offer enough opportunities for children to develop their emerging speaking skills. Staff caring for older children miss opportunities to build on and challenge children's ideas. This means that children do not make sufficient progress in their learning and development. The planning of activities is often generalised and is not used to precisely identify individual next steps in learning for each child. That said, children are happy and enjoy playing with the range of resources and activities on offer. Older children use glue spreaders and brushes to cover surfaces and stick paper onto balloons. They look at their fingers covered in glue and comment on this being 'sticky' and 'yucky'. Young children and babies make choices from a range of easily accessible toys and resources. For example, they choose from a range of books and battery-operated toys stored in shelves and low-level boxes.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Leaders, managers and staff do not ensure that children are always safe. Children's health and welfare are not promoted. Occasionally, when planning menus, the manager does not consider suitable alternatives for those children who have identified allergies. This means that sometimes their individual needs are not fully supported. Children behave well and have secure bonds with staff. They are confident to invite staff and visitors into their play. Children have regular opportunities during the day to play outside where they have opportunities to run, climb, crawl through tunnels and use wheeled toys to promote their physical skills.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Staff do not support children's development well enough, to ensure that they gain the skills needed for their future learning. Sometimes, children lack motivation as staff do not challenge their skills or thinking. Staff fail to recognise when children are ready to move on to the next stage of their learning.
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number EY432811 Local authority Rutland Inspection number 1109732 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 120 Number of children on roll 59 Name of registered person Kathleen Anne Bloomfield
p.6
reference number
Date of previous inspection 7 September 2015 Telephone number 01572 812 828
p.6
reference number
Little Bloomers Day Nursery and Pre School registered in 2011. The nursery is open each weekday from 7am until 6pm, all year round. An additional out-of-school provision operates from Monday to Friday from 7am until 9am and 3.20pm until 6pm during term time. The nursery employs 16 members of staff. Of these 12 hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 2 and 3. One member of staff holds early years professional status. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.6
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.7
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion