Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Buzz Learning Limited

Inspected — · published 7 Aug 2017 · URN 58163

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ken Merry

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NE63 8AP

  • Name on report verified

    Buzz Learning Limited

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 22% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiserapid progresscleareffectivepositivesuccessfullyeffectivelysafehigh-quality
Criticismweaknesseslimitedat risktoo lowdo not knownot effectivenot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1262w+47
  • What needs to improve83w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,327
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Therese Timlin Manager Buzz Learning Limited 8 Esther Court Ashington Northumberland NE63 8AP

p.1

Short inspection of Buzz Learning Limited

Following the short inspection on 5 and 6 July 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The inspection was the first short inspection carried out since the provider was judged to be good in June 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Buzz Learning Limited

You and your staff have successfully addressed almost all the recommendations made at your previous inspection and consequently learners are still receiving high- quality education.

p.1

Short inspection of Buzz Learning Limited

You and your newly introduced advisory board have a clear vision for the future of Buzz Learning Limited. Plans are in place to expand the provision for learners with high needs and this carefully links to the needs and priorities of the local authority, which is supportive of this ambition.

p.1

Short inspection of Buzz Learning Limited

You have strengthened your quality improvement arrangements, and these are effective in identifying strengths and weaknesses in the quality of provision. You ensure that appropriate targets are set, monitored and achieved.

p.1

Short inspection of Buzz Learning Limited

You and your staff know your provision well. Where it has not been possible to secure sustained improvements, such as in the very small proportion of study programmes for young people who were not previously in education, employment or training, you have taken the decision to remove these programmes from your curriculum offer and, instead, refer learners to other providers.

p.1

Short inspection of Buzz Learning Limited

Learners feel safe and demonstrate safe working practices. Teachers ensure that learners have good knowledge of the risks to their safety by skilfully integrating topics such as terrorism and online grooming into their lessons. Learners produce high-quality pieces of work that demonstrate their understanding of such issues.

p.1

Short inspection of Buzz Learning Limited

Well-planned processes to protect learners are in place and understood by staff. Good relationships with the local authority and local police force ensure that staff swiftly identify any learners who are potentially at risk and take appropriate action to keep them safe. Staff keep clear and detailed records relating to potential safeguarding incidents. However, the ‘Prevent’ risk assessment and action plan need updating to reflect better the local threats that learners face.

p.2

Short inspection of Buzz Learning Limited

The designated safeguarding officer and her deputy have carried out appropriate training, and they ensure that all members of staff complete regular training to refresh their understanding of safeguarding, the ‘Prevent’ duty and British values.

p.2

Inspection findings

 An advisory board is now in place to support and challenge managers. The appointment of three external professionals with different specialisms means that managers are more accountable for the quality of provision. There is a clear focus on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment from all managers and advisory board members. This focus has had a positive impact on the experience of learners.  Managers have a clear ambition for the future direction of Buzz Learning Limited, and they articulate this very clearly. They ensure that the curriculum meets local needs and have strong relationships with the local authority. They made the decision to expand the provision for learners with high needs and cease working with learners who were not previously in education, employment or training after careful consideration.  Leaders and advisory board members know the provider well. They make good use of self-assessment to review carefully the quality of the provision. As a result,

p.2

Inspection findings

they accurately identify weaknesses and provide appropriate support to enable staff to make improvements. Managers are clear about what actions they need to take to improve the quality of provision further.  Performance management is effective at maintaining the quality of provision. All members of staff have annual appraisals, and managers set clear objectives for staff to achieve. The appointment of a dedicated quality manager to focus on improving the quality of teaching, learning and assessment has resulted in a series of successful training events that have had a positive impact on teachers’ understanding of key topics, such as the ‘Prevent’ duty and planning for learners with different needs.  Managers evaluate the quality of teaching, learning and assessment accurately by observing lessons regularly. They identify improvement actions for teachers following observations, and closely monitor the progress that teachers make

p.2

Inspection findings

towards overcoming weaknesses. As a result, most teachers improve their teaching skills.  Teachers take account of learners’ starting points very effectively when planning learning. They use information about learners’ prior skills and knowledge well when setting academic and personal targets. Staff regularly review learners’ progress towards their targets and make appropriate adjustments throughout the year to ensure that targets become progressively more challenging. This helps learners to make good progress towards achieving their aspirations.  Learners successfully develop the skills that they need for their future progression. They benefit from teachers’ use of interesting and engaging learning activities. Teachers in different subjects work well and collaboratively to help learners achieve their individual targets; for example, teachers highlight when learners are using English skills in a mathematics session. As a result, learners

p.2

Inspection findings

develop their confidence, independence and team-working skills, and are aware of what they need to do next to improve further.  Learners develop their skills in English and mathematics well. All learners have individualised targets for English and mathematics based on their initial assessments and teachers use these well to ensure that learners take part in activities that develop their knowledge in these subjects. Teachers place appropriate emphasis on learners’ spoken English and broader communication skills. As a result, learners are more confident in speaking to their parents and key workers. However, the proportion of learners who achieve functional skills qualifications in English and mathematics is too low and has been for at least two years.  Careers education, advice and guidance are good. Most learners have very clear plans for their next steps and know what they need to do to reach their intended

p.3

Inspection findings

destinations. The few learners who do not know what they are planning to do when their current course ends receive appropriate ongoing advice from the provider’s careers adviser. Where appropriate, learners are referred to external agencies for further support. Managers now use training staff more appropriately to complete student interviews that ensure that learners start on the right programme.  Staff manage work experience for learners with high needs effectively. Nearly all learners with high needs take part in external work experience placements. Staff carefully select work placements that allow them to agree vocationally relevant targets with learners and employers. Staff review these targets regularly and evaluate the progress of learners in formal reviews. As a result, learners develop the skills that they need for future progression into supported internships or paid employment. However, work placement arrangements for learners on other study

p.3

Inspection findings

programmes are less effective, and this further supports the decision to remove this provision from the curriculum offer for 2017/18.  Support for learners is effective. Managers work closely with the local authority to review education, health and care plans for learners with high needs. Where learners do not have a previous assessment for an education, health and care plan, managers use their strong links with the local authority to ensure that support is put in place that is appropriate to the learners’ needs. Parents value the support that they receive from the provider’s staff and this support helps parents better understand the challenges that their children face in their learning. Appropriately qualified learning support assistants provide helpful support for learners during most lessons. However, in a few instances, assistants are not deployed well enough to ensure that the learners whom they support, particularly

p.3

Inspection findings

the most able, make sufficiently rapid progress.

p.4

Next steps for the provider

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the provider

 a larger proportion of learners achieve functional skills qualifications in English and mathematics  all support staff challenge learners, including the most able, to make rapid progress  the positive actions to keep learners safe from the risks of radicalisation and extremism are formalised into an updated risk assessment and action plan.

p.4

Next steps for the provider

I am copying this letter to the Education and Skills Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors were assisted by the manager as nominee. We met with a range of staff, made telephone calls to appropriate agencies and observed lessons. We scrutinised key strategic and policy documents, including those related to self-assessment, quality assurance and safeguarding. We also considered the views of learners and parents through Ofsted’s online questionnaire and through face-to-face and telephone interviews.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion