Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Little Gems and Little Treasures Ltd
- Group reference verified
RP908032
- Inspection date verified
14 Jul 2017
- Inspectors verified
Jo Caswell
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
CR3 6SX
- Name on report verified
Little Gems 3
- URN verified
122423
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although arrangements are in place to monitor the provision, improvement plans fail to identify weaknesses in teaching. p.4
- Monitoring of children's progress is not good enough and some targets lack focus. p.4
- The steps children use to access the outside area are unsafe and pose a potential risk of injury. p.4
- The weaknesses in leadership and management impact on children and mean they are not fully protected from possible harm. p.4
- This puts children at risk in the event of an emergency. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure all staff are fully aware of their responsibilities in understanding the 'Prevent' duty and the wider aspects of safeguarding children, including internet safety 01/09/2017 p.2
- make better use of risk assessments to ensure all areas of the premises are consistently safe for children's use and any hazards are quickly addressed 01/09/2017 p.2
- maintain an accurate record of children's attendance, including their actual times of arrival and departure 01/09/2107 p.2
- make the steps to the outside area safe for children to use 01/09/2017 p.2
- improve the quality of teaching to make sure staff continually take account of the individual needs, learning styles and developmental ability of all children, including those who are quiet and less confident 31/10/2017 p.2
- make better use of assessment information to ensure staff accurately identify children's individual learning needs and plan for these in all activities 31/10/2017 p.2
- use assessment procedures more precisely to track the progress of all children, including different groups of children, to make sure any gaps are closing 31/10/2017 p.2
- ensure all records relating to children who have special education needs and/or disabilities are accurate and are used effectively to monitor children's learning, care and development needs. 31/10/2017 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety7
“Risk assessments lack detail.” p.1Safeguarding6
“Safeguarding is ineffective.” p.4Parents & families4
“Parents are happy with the pre-school.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,209
- longer than usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Little Gems 3 United Reformed Church, Harestone Hill, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 6SX
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 14 July 2017 22 January 2014
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Not enough action is taken to protect children. Some hazards on the premises have not been made safe. Risk assessments lack detail. Staff and managers are not fully aware of all aspects of safeguarding. The record of children's attendance is not maintained accurately. Staff do not record children's times of arrival and departure. This puts children at risk in the event of an emergency. The leadership team has not monitored the setting closely enough to recognise the breaches in legal requirements and to improve practice. Staff are not planning accurately for children's individual learning needs or monitoring the progress they make. Records for children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities lack sufficient detail. Staff are not checking that different groups of children, such as boys and girls, are making progress from their individual starting points. At times, some children, particularly those who are quieter, younger or not as
p.1
This provision is inadequate
confident, have less interaction from adults than other children. This impacts on their learning and the progress they make.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Parents are happy with the pre-school. They feel their children are well prepared for starting school. Staff care about the children and form positive relationships with them.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure all staff are fully aware of their responsibilities in understanding the 'Prevent' duty and the wider aspects of safeguarding children, including internet safety 01/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
make better use of risk assessments to ensure all areas of the premises are consistently safe for children's use and any hazards are quickly addressed 01/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
maintain an accurate record of children's attendance, including their actual times of arrival and departure 01/09/2107
p.2
Due Date
make the steps to the outside area safe for children to use 01/09/2017 improve the quality of teaching to make sure staff continually take account of the individual needs, learning styles and developmental ability of all children, including those who are quiet and less confident 31/10/2017
p.2
Due Date
make better use of assessment information to ensure staff accurately identify children's individual learning needs and plan for these in all activities 31/10/2017
p.2
Due Date
use assessment procedures more precisely to track the progress of all children, including different groups of children, to make sure any gaps are closing 31/10/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure all records relating to children who have special education needs and/or disabilities are accurate and are used effectively to monitor children's learning, care and development needs. 31/10/2017
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the pre-school routine and evaluated the quality of teaching inside and outside. The inspector talked to staff and children at convenient times during the inspection. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the pre-school supervisor to assess how well leaders monitor the quality of practice. The inspector held discussions with the pre-school manager and the pre-school supervisor to identify how well leaders monitor the setting and know what to do to make improvements. The inspector talked to a small number of parents at the beginning and end of the session and took their views into account.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. The steps children use to access the outside area are unsafe and pose a potential risk of injury. Leaders are aware of this, but have not been able to make the necessary improvements. The pre-school's risk assessment is basic and lacks detail. It has not taken account of all the potential hazards on the premises, such as the communal use of some areas of the church. Staff know how to protect children from these risks, but they have not ensured that specific areas are regularly checked to identify whether any practice needs to be reviewed. Staff have some awareness of child protection arrangements. They know what to do to report any concerns about children's welfare or if an allegation is made against an adult. However, they have not updated their knowledge to take account of new guidance. Therefore, they are unfamiliar with the 'Prevent' duty and do not know what to do to protect children from any extreme views and behaviour.
p.4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Staff have also not considered the wider aspects of safeguarding, such as how to ensure children and parents understand the risks of using the internet. Partnerships with parents and the local schools are well established. Parents comment they know who their child's key person is and receive regular updates about what their children are learning. Although arrangements are in place to monitor the provision, improvement plans fail to identify weaknesses in teaching. A new manager has been appointed who demonstrates a secure understanding of what needs to improve. However, it is too early to see the impact of the changes she is beginning to make.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Staff provide a range of activities for children. However, these are not always planned to sufficiently take account of each child's learning needs. Provision for children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is particularly weak. Monitoring of children's progress is not good enough and some targets lack focus. Staff are not confident in accurately assessing children's abilities and sometimes they think children can do more than they actually can. Some resources and activities have limited challenge and do not engage children for long enough. For example, on the day of inspection, children enjoyed using the wheeled cars inside. A staff member helped them to recognise numbers and children used red and green signs to remind them when to stop and go, and move around safely. However, later in the session, children's play in this area lacked purpose and became disruptive, resulting in one child falling and having an accident. When staff have
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
children's attention, some of the learning is purposeful. For example, they use practical activities to help children's counting and mathematical skills. There are arrangements in place for staff to regularly meet with the supervisor and discuss their performance. Some staff have benefitted from extra training and this has helped to make a small number of changes to how activities are planned. For instance, after a staff member completed a cookery course, different resources were provided in the role-play area. This increased children's interest in imaginative play.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The weaknesses in leadership and management impact on children and mean they are not fully protected from possible harm. At times, younger, quieter and less confident children spend more time on their own and have less interaction from the staff. When staff do notice children are alone, they do not always attempt to engage them in activities with others, or to play alongside them as much they could. The attendance register is not accurate. Staff do not record the times when children arrive or go home. The current system suggests that if children are not collected at 12.15pm they are staying for the lunch club, but this is not always the case. Therefore, should an emergency situation arise after the morning session, there is no accurate record to show exactly which children are still on the premises. Children generally behave well and older children show confidence in managing their feelings and working out any minor disputes together. Children form warm
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
relationships with the staff and approach them happily for comfort and support.
p.5
Outcomes for children are inadequate
The weaknesses in teaching and inaccurate assessment arrangements mean some children do not make as much progress as they could. It is not clear whether all children achieve as well as each other. For example, staff have not made sure that children who receive funding achieve as well as those who do not, or that boys make as much progress across all areas of learning as girls. This means, staff cannot be sure that any gaps in children's learning are closing. Despite this, children do enjoy their morning at pre-school. They arrive happily and quickly engage with their friends. They talk to adults confidently and older children are particularly excited to discuss their move on to school.
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number 122423 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 1068438 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 33 Number of children on roll 41 Name of registered person Little Gems and Little Treasures Ltd
p.6
reference number
Date of previous inspection 22 January 2014 Telephone number 01883343678
p.6
reference number
Little Gems 3 registered in 2000. It is one of three privately owned settings. The pre- school is open on Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday from 9.15am to 12.15pm during term time only. A lunch club operates each day until 1pm. Funding is accepted for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years. There are six members of staff who work with the children, including the manager. Of these, five hold recognised early years qualifications.
p.6
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.7
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion