Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Stoke Gabriel Pre-School

Inspected 13 Jul 2017 · URN 106231

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Stoke Gabriel Preschool Group

  • Group reference verified

    RP517835

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jul 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Sarah Madge

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    TQ9 6SD

  • Name on report verified

    Stoke Gabriel Pre-School

  • URN verified

    106231

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 17% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconfidentlysuccessfullystrongmake good progresswarmcaringeffectivelyconsistently
Criticismfailedconcernsdelays

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings517w+76
  • Leadership162w−14
  • What needs to improve54w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
725
about usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 40%Leadership 13%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 43%

Full report text

Stoke Gabriel Pre-School The Old School Room, Church Walk, Stoke Gabriel, Totnes, Devon, TQ9 6SD

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 13 July 2017 26 February 2014

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2

p.1

This provision is good

 Children settle in quickly, and arrive at the pre-school confidently and eagerly. Staff know the children well and form warm and caring relationships with them. Children use these strong attachments with staff to learn good social skills that help them to make friends. For example, children are kind and offer to help each other without any prompts from staff.  Staff use their accurate assessments and knowledge of children's interests to plan a wide range of activities and experiences which successfully builds on what children know and can do. All children make good progress in their learning.  Staff provide particularly good support for children who have special educational needs and developmental delays. They work closely with parents and outside agencies to implement consistent strategies and effectively meet children's individual needs.  Since the last inspection, the provider and manager have worked hard to maintain good

p.1

This provision is good

outcomes for children. For example, they have increased the range of technology toys, to provide more opportunities for children to explore cause and effect.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 At times, staff do not make best use of opportunities to challenge the oldest children and extend their learning further, such as giving children time to work things out.  Although the manager has links with some other settings that children attend, this does not apply to all early years settings, to enable complementary learning for all children.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 make better use of opportunities to consistently extend the learning of the oldest children even further  form closer partnerships with all other settings that children attend, to exchange regular information about their learning and enable greater consistency in experiences.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the interactions between staff and children, and observed children's participation and engagement during self-chosen and adult-led activities.  The inspector carried out joint observations with the manager, to reflect on the quality of teaching and learning.  The inspector took account of the views of children, their parents and staff, spoken to on the day of the inspection.  The inspector held discussions with the manager and committee members at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector sampled a range of documentation, including children's learning records, evaluative action plans, and staff training certificates and suitability records.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is good

Safeguarding is effective. The manager and staff have a clear understanding of child protection issues and the procedures to follow if they have any concerns about a child's welfare. The committee failed to notify Ofsted of changes to its members within the required timescale. However, there is no impact on children's safety because members of the committee are never on their own with children and have all obtained Disclosure and Barring Service checks. The manager provides good support and coaching, to promote staff's continued professional development. She holds regular meetings with them to talk about their performance and target areas for development. For example, after discussing teaching strategies with the manager and observing good practice from colleagues, staff have improved their teaching of communication and language. The provider and manager are proactive in evaluating the overall quality of the setting. For example, they have plans

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is good

to further develop partnerships with parents and enhance the monitoring of the progress of groups of children.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

Children demonstrate good communication skills and successfully express themselves using a wide vocabulary. For example, they describe the texture of paint as 'squelchy'. Staff teach children well to recognise their name, which helps to support their good literacy development. Staff provide a broad range of activities to develop children's control and coordination of their movements. Children skilfully thread buttons onto wool, and chop and peel fruit for snacks. They confidently use technology toys and eagerly anticipate the effects of the buttons they press, such as sounds and lights. Staff routinely share information with parents and invite them to contribute to children's development records, so they can work together to focus on children's next steps in learning.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good

Children receive good encouragement to behave well from the calm and patient staff, which helps children to understand the boundaries. For example, staff remind them to use the sand timer to help them take turns. Children develop confidence in managing their personal needs and carrying out small tasks, such as asking to help prepare snacks. Staff provide daily opportunities for children to play outside in the fresh air and offer nutritious snacks, to support their healthy lifestyles.

p.3

Outcomes for children are good

Staff prepare children well for the next stage in their development and school. Children learn to count correctly and recognise numbers, such as identifying how many friends are present. They demonstrate high levels of concentration and involvement in their chosen activities, and are curious and motivated learners. For example, they explore paint as they mix colours with their hands, and re-enact what they know and have seen during imaginative games.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 106231 Local authority Devon Inspection number 1068360 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 17 Number of children on roll 32 Name of registered person Stoke Gabriel Preschool Group

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 26 February 2014 Telephone number 01803 782 155

p.4

reference number

Stoke Gabriel Pre-School registered in 1973 and operates from an old school room in the village of Stoke Gabriel, near Totnes, in Devon. The pre-school receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years. It is open during school term time, on Monday to Friday from 9am to 3.30pm. There are six members of staff, one of whom holds a degree, one holds a foundation degree and two hold relevant level 3 qualifications.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion