Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder EY370442
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Jun 2017
- Inspectors verified
Mary Butler
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY370442
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder's lack of knowledge has resulted in a significant number of breaches to welfare and safeguarding requirements. p.1
- The childminder has a weak understanding of the early years foundation stage learning and development requirements, which limits the quality of learning experiences offered to children. p.1
- The poor quality of teaching means that children are not making expected progress in their personal development. p.4
- Significant weaknesses in teaching and assessment practice do not ensure that children are prepared for their next stage of learning. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action p.2
- ensure that Ofsted is informed of all persons aged 16 years or older living or working on the premises 21/07/2017 p.2
- ensure that effective risk assessments are completed and all reasonable steps to remove, minimise and manage risks are taken, with particular regard to the outside area and the trampoline 21/07/2017 p.2
- update child protection procedures in line with the current Local Safeguarding Children Board guidance, with particular regard to the use of mobile phones 21/07/2017 p.2
- develop knowledge of the government’s statutory guidance ‘Working together to Safeguard Children 2015’ and of the ‘prevent duty guidance for England and Wales 2015’ 21/07/2017 p.2
- put in place appropriate arrangements for the supervision of staff, providing support, coaching and training to promote the interests of children and improve the quality of teaching and outcomes for children 21/07/2017 p.2
- ensure that all persons working with children understand safeguarding policy and procedures and have an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues, with particular regard to understanding how to respond to, and where to refer, concerns about a child 21/07/2017 p.2
- ensure that individuals whose suitability has not been fully checked do not have unsupervised contact with children. 21/07/2017 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“The childminder establishes some partnerships with parents.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 903
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 26 June 2017 2 June 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder's lack of knowledge has resulted in a significant number of breaches to welfare and safeguarding requirements. For example, she has not informed Ofsted of all adults working at the premises and her procedures are not in line with those of the Local Safeguarding Children Board. Children's safety is compromised. The childminder's knowledge and understanding of safeguarding and risk assessment are weak and there is little effective support for assistants. The childminder has a weak understanding of the early years foundation stage learning and development requirements, which limits the quality of learning experiences offered to children. This also hinders the progress they are able to make in their learning and development. The childminder has not made any arrangements to complete the statutory progress check for children aged two years and provide the required written summary to
p.1
It has the following strengths
The childminder usually provides a range of toys and activities for children to engage in play. Children are confident to invite adults into their play. Children generally behave well and play together cooperatively. Older children are caring towards babies. The childminder establishes some partnerships with parents. For example, she involves them in their children's care through daily discussions. The childminder reviews her practice and involves her assistants in this process.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that Ofsted is informed of all persons aged 16 years or older living or working on the premises 21/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that effective risk assessments are completed and all reasonable steps to remove, minimise and manage risks are taken, with particular regard to the outside area and the trampoline 21/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
update child protection procedures in line with the current Local Safeguarding Children Board guidance, with particular regard to the use of mobile phones 21/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
develop knowledge of the government’s statutory guidance ‘Working together to Safeguard Children 2015’ and of the ‘prevent duty guidance for England and Wales 2015’ 21/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
put in place appropriate arrangements for the supervision of staff, providing support, coaching and training to promote the interests of children and improve the quality of teaching and outcomes for children 21/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that all persons working with children understand safeguarding policy and procedures and have an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues, with particular regard to understanding how to respond to, and where to refer, concerns about a child 21/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that individuals whose suitability has not been fully checked do not have unsupervised contact with children. 21/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
implement systems to complete the required progress check for children aged two, and provide a short written summary to parents 31/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the quality of teaching practice across all areas of learning, and make regular assessments of all children's progress so that their next stage of learning is planned for accurately. 31/07/2017
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector had a tour of areas of the home used for childminding. The inspector observed teaching practice throughout the inspection and discussed this with the childminder. The inspector held discussions with the childminder to assess her knowledge of statutory requirements. The inspector spoke with the childminder's assistants and the children. The inspector reviewed some of the childminder's policies and documents.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder does not routinely ensure hazards are minimised for children during play. For example, too many children play together at the same time on the trampoline in the garden, which is a risk to their safety. The childminder can identify signs that would cause concern about a child's welfare. However, she does not demonstrate sufficient awareness of the procedures to then follow so that children are fully protected, such as involving relevant local agencies appropriately. The childminder has also overlooked her responsibility to update her knowledge on recent changes in legislation and of Local Safeguarding Children Board procedures. For example, she does not have an effective policy on the appropriate use of mobile phones. Her ability to support her assistants effectively enough to improve their knowledge and practice is weak.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Although the childminder reviews teaching practice, she has limited knowledge of the different ways that children learn and develop. For example, she does not always provide or adapt activities to match all children's needs effectively. The childminder does not carry out assessments of individual children's progress regularly enough to inform their next steps in learning accurately and secure good outcomes for children. However, children are encouraged to choose their own play, and the adults follow their lead. For instance, the assistants support children to communicate their understanding about creatures that live under the sea, and then create colourful drawings from their own ideas.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Children’s welfare cannot be assured because of the childminder’s lack of understanding of safeguarding and risks to their safety. The poor quality of teaching means that children are not making expected progress in their personal development. For example, children are not supported effectively to develop an appreciation of diversity in society beyond their immediate experience. Also, the childminder does not consistently teach children to follow good hygiene practices, such as washing their hands before snack time. However, children are developing some understanding of healthy lifestyles, for instance, they enjoy fresh air and exercise in the childminder's garden. Settling-in routines for new children are flexibly arranged. The childminder gains information from parents about their children from the outset, which helps her to provide consistency for children's care.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Significant weaknesses in teaching and assessment practice do not ensure that children are prepared for their next stage of learning. Children do not have enough opportunities to develop some important skills needed in preparation for school. Nevertheless, children are confident to engage in their chosen activities and can concentrate well.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY370442 Local authority Ealing Inspection number 1093362 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 3 Total number of places 12 Number of children on roll 12
p.5
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2008 and lives in the London Borough of Ealing. She operates her provision between 7am and 6pm on weekdays, throughout the year. The childminder receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years. Two assistants work with the childminder. The childminder holds a relevant childcare qualification at level 3.
p.5
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion