Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Calder, Deborah Evelyn

Inspected 10 Jul 2017 · published 29 Jul 2017 · URN 510224

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Anneliese Fox-Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jul 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Anneliese Fox-Jones

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    510224

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelygood progressaccurateimprovedeffectivesecureenjoyconfident
Criticismat risklackconcernsconcerndelaysharmnot successfulnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings37w0
  • What needs to improve766w+8

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
765
about usual (typical 743)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%What needs to improve 61%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 10 July 2017 17 November 2016

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 The assessment carried out on children between two years and three years does not involve parents and provide them with sufficient detail of their child's progress in the prime areas. The lack of recorded information means any potential delays in children's learning are not recognised.  The childminder is less successful in using information she gains from assessment to monitor and compare children's learning, to be sure that all children make equally good progress.  The childminder's reflection of her practice is not vigorous enough. It does not highlight areas of her teaching practice that would benefit from further development and does not fully take account of the parents' views when evaluating and reflecting on her provision.  The childminder does not seek precise information about what children already know and can do from the outset, to identify accurate starting points in their learning.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder teaches children how to negotiate with their friends and to independently resolve any conflicts that arise, enabling them to play together harmoniously and safely.  Children develop their emotional well-being effectively. They are kind to each other, build friendships and behave well.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that the written progress check is carried out on children aged between two and three years and provide parents with a summary of their progress in the prime areas of learning 21/07/2017

p.2

Due Date

 monitor the information gained from assessment, compare the progress of children even more effectively and address any differences in achievement more quickly. 21/07/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 develop the use of self-evaluation to include the views of parents more and identify clearly where teaching practice can be improved to target a programme of professional development  gather more precise information when children first start, so that prior achievements can be considered fully when assessing their starting points to inform future planning.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector carried out a joint observation with the childminder, discussed learning activities, and assessed the quality and impact of teaching on the children's learning.  The inspector spoke with the childminder and the children at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector looked at documentation, including children's records, and discussed the childminder's policies.  The inspector took account of the parents' views through their written comments.  The inspector discussed the childminder's self-evaluation processes and plans for improvement.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

Since the last inspection, the childminder has made some improvements. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder has completed a course to update her knowledge of the local procedures that she should follow if she had concerns about a child's welfare. She is alert to signs that may indicate a cause for concern. She has secured knowledge of recent changes to safeguarding matters, should a child be at risk of harm from extreme views, and has adapted her procedures accordingly. The childminder's approach to reviewing her service is not fully effective. She has not fully evaluated all areas of her practice to raise the quality of the service she provides. In particular, she does not actively seek ways to develop her skills and knowledge further to improve her quality of teaching.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

The childminder interacts playfully with children and they have fun in her company. However, the childminder does not monitor and review children's progress accurately to identify areas where they may need further support. She has not completed the required progress checks for children aged between two and three years and shared a written summary of these with parents. The childminder supports children's language and mathematical development well. For example, she talks to children as they play and repeats simple words and numbers to build younger children's vocabulary. Children show an interest in the activities available, such as puzzles and a matching picture card game. Younger children are curious and imaginative. For example, they match shapes and discover how things fit together.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

The childminder exchanges general information with parents daily. However, she does not work with the parents to get an accurate understanding of the children's development needs before they start attending. Despite this, children are settled and emotionally secure. They have built secure relationships with the childminder and their care needs are met. The childminder follows the children's lead, allowing them the opportunities to make their own choices. Children learn about healthy lifestyles. They have fresh air and enjoy a range of different experiences and outings. For example, they use the outside space and go to the park to use the different equipment. The childminder provides a range of resources for children with which to play, including items which reflect diversity so the children can learn about other cultures.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Children make some progress in their learning. For example, children become more confident and sociable. They are able to fit puzzles together, show an interest in words, and recognise some colours and shapes. However, assessment is not rigorous enough in monitoring the children's progress to ensure that all children are challenged successfully in the next stages of their learning.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 510224 Local authority West Berkshire (Newbury) Inspection number 1078922 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6

p.4

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 17 November 2016

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 1994. She lives in Thatcham, Berkshire. The childminder offers care from 8am to 6pm on Monday to Friday, all year round, including out-of-school care.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion