Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
ACE Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Austin Community Enterprise Limited
- Group reference verified
RP905120
- Inspection date verified
6 Jul 2017
- Inspectors verified
Janice Hughes
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
DE23 8DH
- Name on report verified
ACE Nursery
- URN verified
206189
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some staff do not recognise signs and symptoms that indicate a child is at risk of harm or where to refer allegations against a member of staff should they arise. p.1
- However, self- evaluation is not accurate enough to identify or address the more pressing weaknesses, such as those in safeguarding and the quality of teaching. p.3
- The provider has failed to attend relevant child protection training. p.3
- The provider cannot assure children's well-being due to weaknesses in safeguarding practice. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff working in the pre-school do not make the most of the opportunities and activities provided for the children to extend their learning. p.3
- They do not encourage children to think or develop their understanding of solving problems. p.3
- Some staff's teaching does not inspire children to learn. p.3
- In contrast, the staff in the baby and toddler rooms are teaching well and interact with enthusiasm. p.3
- Staff encourage young children's physical development effectively. p.3
- For example, babies stretch and grab things, such as bubbles, and two-year-old children use their small-muscle skills effectively to stir soil and make pretend cakes in the mud kitchen. p.3
- Assessments of children's development are used to identify their next steps in learning. p.3
- Outcomes for children in the pre-school room are not good enough. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes3
“Outcomes for children in the pre-school room are not good enough.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 763
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
ACE Nursery Grange Avenue, Derby, Derbyshire, DE23 8DH
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 6 July 2017 16 April 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The provider, who is the manager and the designated lead person for safeguarding, has not attended child protection training or trained staff effectively in this. Some staff do not recognise signs and symptoms that indicate a child is at risk of harm or where to refer allegations against a member of staff should they arise. This means children are not adequately safeguarded. Teaching standards are not consistently good in the pre-school. Some staff do not make the most of opportunities to challenge and extend children's learning in order to help them reach their full potential. The provider has systems in place to evaluate staff performance, however, they are not yet robust enough to raise the quality of teaching in the pre-school room to a consistently good level. Self-evaluation is not strong enough to help identify all areas where improvement is needed in order to provide high-quality care and teaching for children.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff build useful partnerships with parents and other professionals. This helps to support children's care and learning, especially for children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language. Children behave well. Staff provide clear guidance and explanations to help them manage their behaviour. Children are kind and demonstrate good manners.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that the designated lead person for safeguarding attends training to gain an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues and can provide support, advice and guidance to other staff with regard to all safeguarding issues 28/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the quality of teaching in the pre-school room and ensure staff challenge and extend children's learning so they make the best possible progress in all areas 30/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that staff supervisions are more sharply focused on improving the quality of teaching of all staff. 30/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
improve the ongoing self-evaluation process to identify all areas of weakness across the nursery.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector spoke with members of staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection and held meetings with the deputy manager. The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the deputy manager. She took into account the views of parents spoken to on the day of inspection. The inspector spoke to key persons about the children's development and their progress in learning. She also discussed how they identified children's next steps and planned for children's individual needs. The inspector discussed the staff's suitability and qualifications with the deputy manager. She also sampled the policies and procedures and the nursery's action plan, and discussed the safeguarding procedures.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. The provider has failed to attend relevant child protection training. In addition to this she has not effectively trained staff. Some staff's knowledge of safeguarding issues is not secure and has not been embedded into their practice. This compromises children's safety. The manager has made some improvements since the last inspection, such as presenting writing materials in a more inviting way. However, self- evaluation is not accurate enough to identify or address the more pressing weaknesses, such as those in safeguarding and the quality of teaching. The provider does conduct recruitment procedures to ensure the suitability of the staff. However, the supervisions to support staff are not robust enough to ensure consistently good teaching. The provider has used extra funding effectively to help provide more language resources and training.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of teaching is variable. Staff working in the pre-school do not make the most of the opportunities and activities provided for the children to extend their learning. They do not encourage children to think or develop their understanding of solving problems. Some staff's teaching does not inspire children to learn. In contrast, the staff in the baby and toddler rooms are teaching well and interact with enthusiasm. Staff encourage young children's physical development effectively. For example, babies stretch and grab things, such as bubbles, and two-year-old children use their small-muscle skills effectively to stir soil and make pretend cakes in the mud kitchen. Assessments of children's development are used to identify their next steps in learning.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The provider cannot assure children's well-being due to weaknesses in safeguarding practice. In addition, the inconsistencies in the quality of teaching mean that some children are not motivated, supported or inspired to learn as much as they can. Despite this, staff follow children's interests and are attentive to their needs. Children enjoy warm relationships with the staff, who are kind and caring. Staff support children to learn about healthy lifestyles effectively. Children have opportunities to exercise daily and are provided with healthy meals and snacks. Children are learning to respect each other's opinions and about their similarities and differences.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Outcomes for children in the pre-school room are not good enough. They are not supported to help reach their full potential. However, they are gaining some skills to support their future learning. They are listening, taking turns and developing their personal skills. The youngest children make good progress. They are exploring the opportunities that are on offer and developing their communication skills effectively.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 206189 Local authority Derby, City of Inspection number 1089934 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 74 Number of children on roll 110 Name of registered person Austin Community Enterprise Limited
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 16 April 2015 Telephone number 01332 774255
p.4
reference number
ACE Nursery registered in 1999. The nursery is open each weekday from 7.30am to 6pm, all year round, except for a week between Christmas and New Year and on bank holidays. The nursery employs 15 members of staff. Of these, 11 hold appropriate early years qualifications at levels 2 and 3. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion