Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Brierfield Pre School

Inspected 5 Jul 2017 · URN EY386421

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Linda Shore

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Debra Louise Bradshaw

  • Group reference verified

    RP908791

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Jul 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Linda Shore

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Brierfield Pre School

  • URN verified

    EY386421

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+12Mostly positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconsistentlyhappyenjoyeffectivehigh qualitymake good progresspositivelyenjoyment
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesat riskconcernsabsenceharmgapsnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings51w0
  • What needs to improve753w+12

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
764
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 40%

Full report text

Brierfield Pre School Brierfield Community Centre, 21 Colne Road, Brierfield, NELSON, Lancashire, BB9 5HW

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 5 July 2017 30 January 2014

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 The provider has not ensured that the risk assessment programme takes account of the potential risks associated with the only first-aid qualified member of staff being absent.  The monitoring of staff performance is not effectively addressing the inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. This does not ensure that all children make the progress they are capable of.  Staff do not always make effective use of information they gain from their observations of what children can do to consistently plan for their next stage of development.  Systems for self-evaluation have not been rigorous enough to maintain the high quality of the setting that was previously achieved.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children are happy and generally engaged in activities they enjoy. Staff know children well and plan activities that link to children's interests.  Parents comment positively about the care and learning activities their children experience. They are able to support children's learning at home through the book library scheme and comment on their enjoyment and interest in the stories.  Children have access to a good range of resources and move freely around the room, making their own choices about what they play with.  Partnerships with the local school are good. This helps children make the transition to school and settle in ready to learn.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 improve the risk assessment programme to ensure that risks associated with staff absence are identified and addressed promptly 20/07/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that supervision provides effective support, coaching and training for staff in order to drive improvements in the quality of teaching 20/07/2017

p.2

Due Date

 improve teaching so that staff consistently plan challenging experiences for children that help them to build on what they already know and make quicker progress in their learning. 20/07/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 implement a rigorous process for self-evaluation that uses challenging criteria in order to further improve the quality of the provision.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed activities indoors and in the outdoor play area.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector spoke with parents and took account of their views.  The inspector spoke with staff and children at appropriate times during the day and held a meeting with the manager.  The inspector looked at a range of documentation, including policies and procedures and evidence of staff suitability to work with children.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

Although there is a risk assessment programme in place, it is not fully comprehensive. For example, the provider has not considered the risks associated with having only one member of staff who is qualified in first aid and nobody to cover in her absence. Risk assessments are effectively implemented for the environment to help keep children safe. Safeguarding is effective. Staff have a good knowledge of how to identify the signs that children could be at risk of harm. They know the procedures to follow if they have concerns about a child. The manager conducts supervision meetings with staff. However, she does not always focus on the areas that require improvement and not all children are making enough progress. Systems for self-evaluation do not identify weaknesses in practice.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Staff do not always support children's learning well enough. Staff observe and assess children's stage of development and know children's interests well. However, they do not always use the information from these assessments well enough to plan and build on children's individual learning needs. As a result, activities do not always challenge children enough to make good progress. That said, staff are enthusiastic when they play with children and story time is particularly engaging and fun. Interactions with children are warm and positive and staff encourage children to join in with activities. Staff also help children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities or English as an additional language to close gaps in their learning, in partnership with other professionals.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

Weaknesses in leadership and management mean that children's safety cannot always be assured. Children have a key person who takes responsibility for building secure relationships with children and parents and meeting children's individual needs. Staff provide a welcoming environment and children are happy, well behaved and confident with all staff. Staff are good role models and teach children the importance of good hygiene. Children learn about healthy lifestyles and develop their independence skills in preparation for school. They enjoy healthy snacks and confidently choose their own food and pour their milk from a jug.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Weaknesses in the quality of teaching means that not all children are consistently making enough progress in their learning and development. Nevertheless, children are learning some of the skills they will need to prepare them for their eventual move to school. Children learn to play together in small groups and can communicate their needs and ideas. They learn mathematical skills and match colours, sort objects and count how many they have.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY386421 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 1088071 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 30 Number of children on roll 42 Name of registered person Debra Louise Bradshaw

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 30 January 2014 Telephone number 07796313976

p.4

reference number

Brierfield Pre School re-registered under a new individual in 2008 and is in Brierfield, Lancashire. The pre-school operates from Monday to Thursday during term time only. Sessions run from 9.15am to 11.45am and from 12.45pm to 3.15pm. A lunch club is offered where children attend a morning and afternoon session. The pre-school employs six members of staff, five of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 2 to 5. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children and supports children who speak English as an additional language and children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion