Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Newsome Junior School

Inspected 28 Jun 2017 · published 24 Jul 2017 · URN 107630

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Kate Rowley (lead), Heather Mensah, Susan Twaits

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Jun 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Heather Mensah, Kate Rowley, Susan Twaits

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    HD4 6JN

  • Name on report verified

    Newsome Junior School

  • URN verified

    107630

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivestrongeffectivelycleareffectivesuccessfullysuccessfulexcellent
Criticismrequires improvementnot alwaysdeclinepoornot consistentlygapsdisruptionnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings907w+2
  • Leadership198w−11
  • Safeguarding206w+18
  • What needs to improve1766w+46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
3,012
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 47%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Newsome Junior School Castle Avenue, Newsome, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire HD4 6JN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Considerable turbulence in leadership and staffing, which continues, has contributed to a decline in standards.  While school development plans generally focus on the right priorities, they are not detailed or precise enough to steer improvement rapidly.  Assessment systems do not provide leaders and teachers with clear information about the progress that pupils make from their starting points. As a result, gaps in learning are not always accurately identified.  The monitoring of disadvantaged pupils’ progress has not been robust or well enough organised to check that the additional funding for these pupils is spent effectively. Disadvantaged pupils do not make enough progress over their time in school to catch up with other pupils nationally.  Teachers do not all have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve. Pupils of all abilities are often not challenged enough in their learning. Expectations of how pupils

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

present their work and apply the spellings they have learned are also variable.  Lower-ability pupils do not always receive enough support to develop their writing skills effectively.  Behaviour at lunchtimes is often unsettled. Pupils and staff say that this is a challenging time of the day. In lessons, a number of pupils are disengaged and a few can disrupt their own learning and that of others.  Governors demonstrate a desire to improve the school and support the well-being of leaders and staff, but they are not clear enough about their role in checking the effectiveness of the school’s work to improve outcomes for pupils.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 New leaders have created a positive culture of safeguarding as a priority. They have put effective systems in place to help keep pupils safe.  The care and guidance offered to pupils with complex needs is enabling them to be successful in their learning.  Pupils have a good understanding of different faiths and cultures. They are developing clear moral values.  Pupils are eager to talk about their work. They are proud of their school and speak positively about many aspects of their learning, such as reading, outdoor learning and physical education.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – refining assessment systems to track all pupils’ progress accurately from their starting points, so that any gaps in learning can be quickly identified and addressed – evaluating the progress that different groups of pupils are making, such as those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who are disadvantaged, to check the impact of additional funding and adapt support accordingly – making sure that the school’s plans for improvement are more precise, with clearly identified outcomes, responsibilities and checking points.  Improve the quality of teaching and learning by: – giving pupils of all abilities opportunities to extend their learning and develop their ideas, particularly in mathematics – making sure that there is greater consistency in teachers’ expectations of high- quality presentation and accuracy of spelling

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

– ensuring that lower-ability pupils have the support and resources they need to help them make strong progress in writing.  Improve pupils’ behaviour by: – reviewing the behaviour policy with the school community, to ensure that positive behaviours are expected and consistently promoted by all adults – eradicating low-level disruption and disengagement in lessons – improving the quality of support and engagement for pupils at lunchtimes to ensure that positive behaviours are encouraged and lunchtimes become a more successful and purposeful time of the day. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Since the retirement of the long-term headteacher three years ago, there have been considerable changes in the school leadership and teaching team. While there is an ambition from the current team to improve, there are still major changes taking place, and the decline in standards has not been fully addressed.  When the last substantive headteacher left in summer 2016, the governing body were unable to recruit a permanent leadership team. Leaders and staff working within the school stepped up to the roles of acting headteacher, deputy headteacher and senior leader as a temporary measure. The new leadership team have been committed to tackling the major improvements needed, building on from the previous decline in staff morale, pupils’ behaviour and standards. They have successfully made improvements in fundamental aspects of safeguarding. They have started to unpick the strengths and weaknesses in pupils’ behaviour and the reasons for these differences. However, they

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

have not had the guidance necessary to help them improve outcomes in teaching and learning rapidly enough.  Although inexperienced in leadership, the acting leadership team have good curriculum subject knowledge. They have accurately identified which aspects of teaching and learning most need improvement. However, the plans for directing this improvement are not sharp enough, or monitored frequently enough to secure stronger pupils’ outcomes.  After a slow start, external support has been more forthcoming recently, to accurately assess the current position of the school and plan carefully for the further changes that are inevitable in September. The school learning partner has an accurate understanding of the school. Funding has now been secured by the local authority for a support package focused on improving leadership, teaching and learning. This is due to be implemented in September 2017. A local leader of education has recently started to

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

work with the school and is gaining a secure understanding of the areas for improvement.  Aspects of middle leadership are strong. For example, the mathematics leader has excellent subject knowledge and a clear understanding of the national expectations. She leads well by example, having high expectations of the pupils in her class, recognising gaps in their learning and quickly directing and adapting her teaching to address pupils’ needs. Her work across the school is having a positive impact on pupils’ fluency in mathematics. She has accurately identified that teachers need to have higher expectations of what all pupils can achieve.  The leader with responsibility for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities has a clear view of the wide-ranging needs of these pupils. She has refined systems for identifying which pupils need specific support. She directs training for teachers and support staff well to support their understanding of pupils’ different

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

needs. As a result, staff plan appropriate work to support pupils’ progress, academically, emotionally and socially. Much of the funding for these pupils is directed to provide additional teaching assistant time, so that pupils can successfully learn in small groups or one-to-one activities. These sessions are effective in moving pupils’ learning forward. The leader agrees that a more robust system for assessment will help leaders and staff have a clearer view of the progress that these pupils make over time.  Leaders have assessed the potential barriers to learning that disadvantaged pupils may have and use the pupil premium funding to address these. Although they have checked the progress that pupils are making across the year, they agree that the current assessment systems do not support them in doing this effectively. Leaders have looked at pupils’ work to make some checks on teachers’ assessments, but agree that they

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

need a more robust combination of evidence to be sure of the impact of directed work.  Leaders’ work to improve writing has had a particularly positive impact in upper key stage 2. High-quality shared class texts are engaging older pupils in reading and writing activities and supporting their stronger progress this year.  Leaders value partnerships with parents. They have put a number of activities in place that are encouraging parents to be involved in school life, as well as giving them opportunities to share and celebrate their children’s learning. These include coffee and cake sessions, school picnics and invitations to ‘extra special assemblies’.  Leadership across areas of the curriculum other than English and mathematics is generally in its infancy. Learning in subjects such as science, history and geography takes place, but sporadically across school. However, direction and support in outdoor

p.4

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

learning is strong. In addition, the primary school physical education and sport funding is used well to give pupils wide and frequent physical activity opportunities.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors have a clear view of the key issues facing the school: the difficulties in securing sustainable, high-quality leadership; a recent decline in standards; and perceptions of pupils’ poor behaviour. Being mindful of the previous low staff morale and the strong commitment of the very willing but inexperienced leadership team, they have prioritised steadying the ship and supporting the well-being of staff. However, they have not had a clear enough view, or a good enough understanding, of the progress that pupils and groups of pupils are making. They have not challenged leaders about the impact of their work. For example, although governors know what the pupil premium funding has been spent on, they do not know what impact it has had on the progress, emotionally and academically, these pupils have made. Similarly, they do not know if the funding for pupils who have special educational needs and/or

p.4

Governance of the school

disabilities has helped them to make good progress from their starting points.  Governors are working together with the local authority to think more creatively about the long-term leadership of the school. A consultation is currently taking place about a possible federation with the school’s feeder infant and nursery school.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The acting headteacher rightly prioritised actions at the beginning of the academic year to ensure that the safety of pupils was paramount. These included training updates for staff, an overhaul of the systems for the checking of staff and a secure sign-in system for visitors to the site. Leaders, including the acting headteacher and the local leader for education working with the school, explain that careful consideration is being given to the assessment of the site security. The site is shared with the high school and aspects are open, without physical boundaries. Consultation with the local authority is underway. In the meantime, leaders have put a risk assessment and resulting measures in place to manage any potential risks.  Policies and procedures for keeping pupils safe are in place and understood by all adults in school. Staff have received regular updates this year to make sure that they

p.4

Safeguarding

know exactly what to do if a concern in raised.  There is a clear understanding of the new electronic system for recording concerns. Any incidents noted are followed up efficiently and effectively. There is successful communication with other agencies to ensure that pupils and their families receive appropriate support.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teachers, many who are new to teaching, have started to develop a clear understanding of the national expectations in English and mathematics. However, pupils’ progress over time is not consistently good in reading, writing or mathematics. There is not always enough opportunity for pupils to extend their ideas and learning, particularly those who are the most able.  Teachers are clear about which of their pupils are disadvantaged and generally plan effectively for them in the classroom. They put in place additional activities and support when they spot that these pupils have not grasped a concept. Support staff follow these activities through well and give quick written and verbal feedback to the teacher about the progress made. Generally, short-term accelerated progress can be seen when these interventions take place. However, teachers agree that the school assessment systems do not take into account the pupils’ starting points. Pupils are not

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

making rapid enough progress to catch up with other pupils nationally.  In mathematics, a whole-school focus to develop speed and efficiency in number work is having a positive impact on the progress that pupils are making. However, activities in lower key stage 2 often do not allow pupils the opportunity to explore and develop their ideas using the mathematical skills they have gained.  Pupils in upper key stage 2 are eager to talk about the exciting class texts they are reading and the direction these give to their written work. Pupils have opportunities to write in a wide range of styles in activities they are clearly enjoying. Their tasks are purposeful and engaging and consequently older pupils are making more rapid progress than in recent years. In lower key stage 2, this work is not fully embedded. Expectations of what pupils can achieve are not always as high, for example in the presentation of their work and the application of the spellings they have learned.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

Sometimes the lower-ability pupils do not receive enough support and direction to enable them to successfully complete tasks.  Work across the curriculum is developing. Some aspects are stronger, such as the opportunities through practical activities in physical education and music. For example, a group of Year 6 pupils were improving their football skills alongside developing qualities such as resilience and respect. Pupils across the school spoke eagerly about their trip to the Kirklees Music Festival, where they developed their musical skills, singing and performing with pupils from other schools. The wider development of skills such as team-building and problem-solving are promoted well in the outdoor learning activities. Pupils develop strong moral values and an understanding of tolerance and respect through effective teaching in religious education. The quality of teaching in other areas of the curriculum, such as science, history and geography, is more variable

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

across school. As a result, pupils’ progress in these subjects is not as strong.

p.6

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement.  Although pupils are confident about the support they are given to manage their emotions during lesson times, they are very clear that lunchtimes are a difficult time of the day. They say that there are regular fall-outs that often result in physical violence. Pupils say that well-meaning lunchtime staff encourage them to try to sort the problems out between themselves, but that they are unable to do this.  Pupils are taught about a range of ways to keep safe, for example when out in the community or when riding their bicycles. They are taught how to use the internet safely. They know about potential risks and take care to manage these carefully. For example, they explained that their school grounds are shared with the high school, so they must not access areas outside without at least one adult. They say that bullying is

p.6

Personal development and welfare

rare, but that when it does occur, leaders and teachers step in and support them well.  Vulnerable pupils with complex needs are supported successfully through a number of different strategies that are well matched to their needs.  Pupils speak highly about the school and the opportunities they are offered, for example in visits, sporting activities and musical events. The chance to read to one of the ‘reading friends’ is a highlight of the week for some of the Year 3 pupils. This calm, positive and engaging opportunity to share books with one of the visiting adults is supporting pupils well in developing their reading skills and their love of books.  Teaching about different faiths, cultures and points of view is of high quality. Pupils give thoughtful responses to questions about tolerance and respect. They speak confidently and assertively about how everyone is equal and should be valued. In a

p.6

Personal development and welfare

religious education lesson, pupils gave numerous thoughtful answers to the question, ‘What is more important than money?’ Responses included family, memories, sharing and respect.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  There is a strong feeling among many adults in school that pupils’ poor behaviour has had a negative impact on teaching and learning over recent years. In lessons, some low-level disruption and, more often, disengagement, does negatively affect pupils’ progress in lessons. However, many pupils are polite, listen carefully to each other and adults and want to do their best. They are proud of their school and positive about the support they receive during lesson times.  Although the behaviour policy was updated last year, behaviour strategies and systems are not always used consistently by adults across school, which has an impact on the way pupils respond.  Some pupils have complex needs. Many of these pupils are supported well by caring, patient staff who look at creative, positive ways to address their emotional and academic needs.  Pupils enjoy school. They arrive on time and their attendance is typically in line with

p.6

Behaviour

and sometimes better than that of other pupils nationally.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils enter school in Year 3 with skills that are in line with or better than those of pupils nationally in reading, writing and mathematics. While pupils’ attainment of the expected standard at the end of Year 6 in 2016 was in line with national figures in reading, writing and mathematics, the progress that these pupils made was significantly less than that of their national peers.  Disadvantaged pupils do not make consistently strong progress over their time in school. In 2016, Year 6 disadvantaged pupils made significantly less progress from their starting points than other pupils nationally in reading, writing and mathematics. The current year 6 pupils have made stronger progress this year and the previous gap between these pupils and others in school has diminished. However, across other year groups the gap remains and pupils are not catching up.  Not enough focus and support is given to the most able pupils to extend and deepen

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

their learning, particularly in mathematics. These pupils do not make good progress across school.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are starting to make better gains in their learning now that processes to identify and support their needs have been refined. Specific staff training and programmes of work have helped to ensure that pupils’ emotional needs are well met.  Outcomes across the curriculum are varied. Strong progress is made in subjects such as religious education and physical education, but progress in other subjects is more limited.

p.7

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Website http://newsomejuniors.sharepoint.com

p.8

School details

Email address head.newsomejun@kirkleeseducation.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 4–5 February 2009

p.8

Information about this school

 Newsome Junior School is a slightly smaller than the average-sized primary school.  The school is currently going through a formal consultation to federate with Berry Brow Infant and Nursery School.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is similar to the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities with an education, health and care plan is above average.  The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is similar to the national average.  The proportion of pupils who are known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium is above average.  The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed pupils’ learning in a range of lessons, some alongside the acting headteacher and acting deputy headteacher.  Inspectors looked at a range of pupils’ work across the curriculum. For English and mathematics this scrutiny of work took place alongside middle leaders.  Inspectors looked at a wide range of school documents, including: assessment information; school development planning; school self-evaluation; minutes of meetings of the governing body; external reports; information about the performance of teachers; documents relating to behaviour and safety; and documents relating to safeguarding.  Meetings took place with the acting headteacher, the acting deputy headteacher, the senior leader, middle leaders, teaching and support staff, representatives from the governing body, the local authority learning partner, administration staff and groups of pupils. A phone call took place with the local leader for education who has recently

p.10

Information about this inspection

started work with the school.  Inspectors listened to pupils read.  Inspectors considered the 18 responses on Parent View.

p.10

Inspection team

Kate Rowley, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Susan Twaits Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion