Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Highfield Primary School

Inspected 28 Jun 2017 · published 24 Jul 2017 · URN 106329

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    28 Jun 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lenford White

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    M41 9PA

  • Name on report verified

    Highfield Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesuccessfullyhighly effectiveeffectivelystrongexceptionallystrengthssafeambitious
Criticismweaknessesconcernconcernslower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1365w+75
  • What needs to improve97w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,453
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Lorna Robertson Headteacher Highfield Primary School Bridgenorth Avenue Urmston Greater Manchester M41 9PA

p.1

Short inspection of Highfield Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 28 June 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in December 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Highfield Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You and your other leaders work exceptionally well together. You are highly motivated, well organised and ambitious. All members of staff know where the school’s strengths and weaknesses lie. Your self-evaluation is accurate and provides a solid basis from which to continually move the school forward. Staff morale is high. All know what the school is aiming to achieve and support senior leaders and governors in their ambitions. Staff are proud to work at Highfield Primary School, which they say, quite correctly, has sustained and extended the strengths identified at the previous inspection. Pupils enjoy coming to school and make good progress due to its caring and purposeful ethos. Parents are overwhelmingly positive about the school and are of the view that their children are safe and well looked after.

p.1

Short inspection of Highfield Primary School

Governors describe you as a good leader, with skills that complement those of your senior leadership team. Your regular reports to governors provide a solid foundation for them to ask pertinent questions in relation to both your and the school’s performance. You have successfully introduced a new tracking system which allows you to not only assess pupils’ progress in subjects such as reading, writing and mathematics, but also capture information about pupils’ interests and attitudes to learning. Your records for monitoring the quality of teaching offer good advice to teachers on how they can improve their practice. In addition, you hold teachers accountable for pupils’ achievement. These practices help to ensure that pupils’ progress continues to improve and provide a secure base from which to pin-point areas for improvement.

p.1

Short inspection of Highfield Primary School

You have successfully tackled the areas for improvement from the previous inspection. One of the things you were asked to do was to improve the rate of pupils’ progress in reading and writing in key stage 1. You were also asked to improve their knowledge of letters and sounds. Highly effective teaching in the early years, notably in phonics, has raised outcomes, which have been well above average for several years. The improvement in pupils’ phonics skills provides them with a solid grounding in reading and writing, which is built on very effectively in Year 1. For several years the results of the national phonics screening check at the end of Year 1 have been well above average. Similarly, since 2014, pupils’ attainment at the end of key stage 1 has been at least good in reading, writing and mathematics. In 2016, the performance of the most able pupils was especially strong, particularly in reading.

p.2

Short inspection of Highfield Primary School

Inspectors also asked leaders to review teachers’ planning to ensure that enough attention is given to the most able pupils. You have acted upon this with rigour and ensured that teachers’ planning accounts for the specific educational needs of the most able pupils. This is clear in pupils’ workbooks. The most able are set challenging tasks in English, and their work is very expressive and demonstrates accurate grammar, punctuation and spelling. In mathematics, particularly in key stage 2, pupils routinely solve complex problems and regularly apply their good calculations skills in subjects such as science and geography. Pupils know how to improve their learning because they take note of the useful advice provided by their teachers.

p.2

Short inspection of Highfield Primary School

Together with staff and governors, you have ensured that safeguarding procedures are robust. Records are up to date, well maintained, fit for purpose and successfully implemented. Staff and governors, and your designated safeguarding leaders, are trained effectively and conversant with the most current government guidelines on keeping children safe in education. Your school has risk assessments in place to cover all eventualities. Those I examined, including one for your Nursery children’s trip that took place during the inspection, were comprehensive.

p.2

Short inspection of Highfield Primary School

Your induction arrangements for new staff are effective and help to maintain the strong sense of safety and security in the school. All staff know what to do if they have a concern about a pupil’s safety or welfare. All parents who completed Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, indicated that they are happy that their children are safe and well looked after in school. Their texts and comments to me echoed this view.

p.2

Short inspection of Highfield Primary School

You and your colleagues work effectively to ensure that most pupils’ attendance is good. You recognise the need to continue to work with families, especially those of disadvantaged pupils, to improve attendance even further. Pupils have a good understanding of dangers and risks. They say that bullying is rare and always dealt with. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe when using the internet. They are aware of various forms of prejudice-based bullying, such as racism, which they say rarely takes place in school. Pupils appreciate that they can talk to staff about concerns and have them dealt with promptly.

p.2

Inspection findings

 During the inspection, I focused on four different areas. After reviewing safeguarding, my second line of enquiry was to assess how well disadvantaged pupils perform in the school. I looked particularly at the effectiveness of the school’s work to diminish the differences between disadvantaged pupils’ performance and that of other pupils nationally. This was because outcomes for these pupils at the end of Year 6 in 2016 were much lower than in 2015, at which time they were good. You were disappointed with this outcome and, with the full support of governors, have taken prompt remedial action this year.  Your senior leaders and teachers’ work focuses closely on supporting disadvantaged pupils. They know exactly how these pupils perform because of your good procedures for tracking pupils’ performance. Specialist training and timely interventions have helped to accelerate the progress of disadvantaged

p.3

Inspection findings

pupils across the school, as shown in your own progress data and assessment information and in disadvantaged pupils’ workbooks. However, you appreciate that more work needs to be done to further diminish the difference between their progress in reading, writing and mathematics and that of other pupils nationally.  My third focus was on the quality of teaching in key stage 2, concentrating on pupils’ achievement in reading. This was because pupils’ attainment and progress in this subject at the end of Year 6 in 2016 was not as good as in writing or mathematics. You immediately recognised this ‘dip’ and set about raising the bar to promote the importance of reading across the school. Initiatives to improve pupils’ comprehension skills, such as encouraging pupils to write creatively and read poetry during National Poetry Day, have improved pupils’ skills. In addition, promoting reading through your reading ambassadors’ scheme and introducing

p.3

Inspection findings

reading at breakfast during World Book Day, have all helped to raise the profile of reading and improve standards.  Pupils told me that they are especially fond of book club, where they read very challenging texts, and that their interest in reading has heightened as a result of meeting visiting authors. The most able pupils in Year 6 are avid readers who appreciate the books of many different authors.  Finally, I investigated the effectiveness of senior leaders’ work to improve the attendance of a small group of pupils. Most of these pupils are disadvantaged, and some have special educational needs. In 2016, their attendance was identified as being in the lowest 10% of all pupils nationally. You work closely with families to emphasise the importance of attendance and how this impacts on their children’s achievement. In addition, your close-working relationship with different partners, including education welfare officers from the local authority, is

p.3

Inspection findings

paying dividends. The result of your arduous work has been to improve the attendance of disadvantaged pupils. You are aware of the need to continue to improve the attendance of this group as well as a small core of pupils who have special educational needs.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 the progress of disadvantaged pupils in reading, writing and mathematics continues to improve, making sure that differences between their performance and that of other pupils nationally continue to diminish  strategies to improve the attendance of a small group of disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs continue to be stringently implemented.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Trafford. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, the designated leader for safeguarding, and the deputy headteacher, the leader of the early years provision. I also met with English and mathematics coordinators, your coordinators for special educational needs and members of the governing body. I held a meeting with your adviser from the local authority. Together with you and your deputy headteacher, I visited a Reception class and classes in key stages 1 and 2. I scrutinised pupils’ workbooks and held a meeting with pupils from across the school to talk to them about behaviour and safety. I also met with pupils from Years 2 and 6 to discuss books and authors and listen to them read. I met informally with parents at the start of the school day, and considered 41 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, which included 39 comments. I took account of 21 responses to the staff survey administered at the time of the inspection, as well as the school’s own

p.4

Information about the inspection

surveys of parents and pupils’ views. I scrutinised various documents, including a range of policies, safeguarding records, the school self-evaluation, behaviour records and information on current pupils’ progress and attendance.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion