Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Old Hutton Pre School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP907282
- Inspection date verified
3 Jul 2017
- Inspectors verified
Katie Sparrow
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LA8 0NQ
- Name on report verified
Old Hutton Pre-School
- URN verified
501095
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities receive excellent support. p.3
- Children are effective risk assessors and learn to manage their own safety very well. p.3
- Children benefit from the small- group size and close support they receive from staff, promoting strong and positive relationships well. p.3
- Children are keen and successful learners who enjoy their time at pre-school. p.3
- Staff are well qualified and, generally support children's learning well through strong teaching. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of changes to members of the committee. p.1
- They have failed to provide Ofsted with the required information to enable them to carry out suitability checks. p.1
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
- The provider has failed to ensure that Ofsted have the information they need to carry out checks that ensure that all committee members are suitable for their role. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure that Ofsted are provided with the necessary information to enable them to carry out suitability checks on committee members. 15/07/2017 p.2
- use self-evaluation more effectively and focus more precisely on the impact of planned changes p.2
- enhance teaching during group activities, particularly with a wide age range of children and provide even more challenge for the most able children. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes3
“Children make good progress in their learning.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 845
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Old Hutton Pre-School Old Hutton Village Hall, Old Hutton C of E School, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 0NQ
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 3 July 2017 5 February 2014
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of changes to members of the committee. They have failed to provide Ofsted with the required information to enable them to carry out suitability checks. This poses a risk to children's safety and welfare. This is also a requirement of the Childcare Register. Self-evaluation does not focus strongly enough on the outcome of planned changes to ensure improvements are targeted and will achieve maximum impact on outcomes for children. On occasion, during large-group activities, staff are not always perceptive to the mixed ability of the group in order to provide the most able children with sufficient challenge.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The manager demonstrates passion and commitment. She highly values the staff team and provides good support through systems of supervision and performance management that are tailored to the needs and working dynamic of the team. Staff prepare children particularly well for their eventual move on to school and good priority is placed on children's high emotional well-being. Staff work very closely with the link school to ensure continuity for children as they prepare to move up to the Reception class. Children are happy, confident and demonstrate a good attitude to their learning. They are, generally, deeply engaged during play as staff plan using children's own interests and ideas. Children make good progress in their learning.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that Ofsted are provided with the necessary information to enable them to carry out suitability checks on committee members. 15/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
use self-evaluation more effectively and focus more precisely on the impact of planned changes enhance teaching during group activities, particularly with a wide age range of children and provide even more challenge for the most able children.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the impact this has on children's learning during play, inside and outside. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the pre-school manager. The inspector spoke to members of staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection and held a meeting with the manager and chair of the committee. The inspector took account of the views of parents spoken to on the day of the inspection. The inspector looked at children's records, evidence of the suitability of staff and a range of other documentation. The inspector discussed the pre-school's planning, policies and procedures and self-evaluation.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The provider has failed to ensure that Ofsted have the information they need to carry out checks that ensure that all committee members are suitable for their role. However, in-depth recruitment procedures help to ensure that staff working directly with children are suitable to do so. Staff are knowledgeable about the procedures to follow if they have any concerns about a child's welfare. Children's progress is subject to close monitoring. The manager can swiftly identify emerging gaps in children's learning and areas of the educational programme that require enhancing. Children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities receive excellent support. Staff are deployed effectively, based on qualifications, skills and experience, to work closely with children, their families and involved professionals to ensure continuity of care and learning. Systems for self-evaluation are not in place to
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
more effectively focus on the impact of planned changes.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
Staff are well qualified and, generally support children's learning well through strong teaching. Staff make regular and accurate assessments of children and plan effectively for what children need to learn next. Staff are skilful in using children's ideas to steer learning in different directions. For example, children use their imaginative skills as they pretend to be doctors and patients in the role-play hospital. Staff join in with their storyline and suggest the doctors write down the injuries, helping promote children's literacy skills well. Staff go on to ask children about the different roles adults have and to draw upon their experiences from home. Children make valuable contributions to discussions and demonstrate very good communication skills. Parents are widely involved in their children's learning and are encouraged to share what they know about their children's learning at home.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The welfare of children is not totally secure because the provider has not ensured that members of the committee have been thoroughly vetted. Children benefit from the small- group size and close support they receive from staff, promoting strong and positive relationships well. Children behave well and take steps to support others to follow the pre- school rules and routine. Children are effective risk assessors and learn to manage their own safety very well. For example, they carefully navigate through the conservation area, showing a good understanding of safe distances they should keep from the pond and nettles. Children develop a good understanding of healthy lifestyles. They are aware of the need to drink plenty of water during warm weather and after physical activity. Children enjoy a wide range of opportunities to play outside and participate in physical activity.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
Children are keen and successful learners who enjoy their time at pre-school. Older children begin to blend letter sounds and some children learn to read simple sentences. Younger children develop good literacy skills and physical skills to develop strength in their hands and fingers necessary for early writing. Children display good social skills. They play cooperatively with their older and younger peers and confidently approach new visitors to the pre-school. Children develop the skills they need for their future learning and in readiness for school.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 501095 Local authority Cumbria Inspection number 1087835 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 12 Number of children on roll 20 Name of registered person Old Hutton Pre School Committee
p.5
reference number
Date of previous inspection 5 February 2014 Telephone number 01539720309 or 07403667031
p.5
reference number
Old Hutton Pre-School registered in 2003. The pre-school is open from 9am to 3pm, Monday to Friday. In total, four staff work at the pre-school, all of who hold relevant qualifications. The pre-school receives funding to provide free early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.5
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion