Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Southampton City Council

Inspected — · published 20 Jul 2017 · URN 54509

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Richard Pemble

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SO14 7LY

  • Name on report verified

    Southampton City Council

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyvery wellpositivesafehigh expectationsimprovedvery highmake good progress
Criticismyet toat risknot confident

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings832w+80
  • What needs to improve189w+9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,010
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 50
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Denise Edghill Head of Economic Development and Skills Southampton City Council Municipal Block Civic Centre Road Southampton SO14 7LY

p.1

Short inspection of Southampton City Council

Following the short inspection on 27 and 28 June 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The inspection was the first short inspection carried out since the provider was judged to be good in May 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Southampton City Council

You and your team have worked effectively to make sure that a very high proportion of learners on courses that do not lead to qualifications achieve their course objectives and personal learning goals. This enables a similarly high proportion to move on to positive destinations and/or next steps, which include employment, volunteering, community work, improving their own health and well- being and improving family life.

p.1

Short inspection of Southampton City Council

Your learners are supported very well by your staff and by those who work for your subcontractors. They receive very clear and appropriate advice on their choice of course and this helps to make sure that the vast majority of learners are on a course appropriate to their starting points and aspirations and that they have high rates of attendance at lessons.

p.1

Short inspection of Southampton City Council

Your managers have set clear and high expectations to your subcontractors to make sure that learners are safe. Most of them know how to keep themselves safe in the wide range of learning venues across the city and in their daily lives.

p.1

Short inspection of Southampton City Council

Safeguarding arrangements meet statutory requirements, and managers ensure that subcontractors, who all have a designated lead manager for safeguarding, work effectively to make sure that learners feel safe and are safe in the wide variety of learning locations which they use. On the rare occasions when safeguarding incidents arise, council managers investigate these thoroughly and sensitively and take appropriate actions.

p.1

Short inspection of Southampton City Council

Managers’ expectation, and contractual requirement, that subcontractor staff are up to date with their safeguarding training is monitored at least annually through the contract review process. However, records for safeguarding training are not complete for all subcontractors, despite training having taken place. Safeguarding is discussed at the bi-monthly provider meetings and good practice is shared effectively.

p.2

Short inspection of Southampton City Council

Learners are developing a sound understanding of British values and how these relate to their daily lives. Teachers are using British values well to help the majority of learners understand how to keep themselves safe from the dangers of extremism and radicalisation. For example, learners on a course for English for speakers of other languages talk confidently about how British values relate to living in their new community in Britain, while also practising their spoken English skills. However, learners who learn online or who do not have allocated teaching sessions are less confident about how to keep themselves safe from these dangers.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Teachers on courses that do not lead to a qualification have high aspirations and ambitions for their learners. They set them specific learning and personal goals that raise their aspirations and ambitions to do well on their course and move on to a positive destination. As a result of this, most learners improve their confidence, develop much enthusiasm for learning and make good progress. The majority move on to positive destinations, such as employment, further learning or improved health and well-being. For example, learners on family cooking courses learn to cook healthy dishes to a budget and with unfamiliar ingredients for their families; they share recipes and cooking tips through social media during the course and once the course has finished.  The majority of learners on courses that lead to qualifications, which form a small minority of your provision, achieve these. However, about a fifth are not

p.2

Inspection findings

successful and either leave the course early or do not pass their examinations or assessments. In a few cases, teachers do not have sufficiently high aspirations for what their learners, particularly the most able, can achieve, and l find the course too easy or they do not fulfil their potential and excel.  Managers work very effectively with subcontractors to ensure that the range of courses offered meet the skills needs of learners and the council’s community priorities very well. Through their frequent contact with and monitoring of subcontractors’ performance, managers are able to reallocate funding for new courses through the contract year to meet changing local priorities for learning. While managers work closely with subcontractors’ staff and provide them with good support to help improve areas of underperformance, they have yet to set targets and actions to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment

p.2

Inspection findings

for them.  Learners receive very good advice, guidance and support to help them make a suitable choice of course when they first enquire about the opportunities that adult learning can achieve. Managers have improved recently the access that learners have to high-quality careers guidance while they are on their course, particularly for those on courses that lead to a qualification. However, this has yet to extend to all subcontractors.

p.2

Next steps for the provider

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the provider

 a larger proportion of learners on courses that lead to a qualification achieve these, by monitoring closely their progress and intervening swiftly where learners are at risk of not achieving  teaching, learning and assessment improve further, particularly on courses that lead to a qualification, with emphasis on making sure that the most able learners have challenging targets and that teachers are highly ambitious for what these learners can achieve  they set subcontractors actions to improve the quality of teaching and learning, and that managers monitor and support them to achieve these  all subcontractors, particularly those who offer courses online or by distance learning, make sure that they have appropriate methods of training to help learners understand how to keep themselves safe from the dangers of extremism and radicalisation  records of safeguarding training and refresher training for all relevant council and

p.3

Next steps for the provider

subcontractor staff are up to date and reflect the training that they have completed.

p.3

Next steps for the provider

I am copying this letter to the Education and Skills Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and one Ofsted Inspector. We were assisted by the community learning manager as nominee. We visited subcontractors’ sites to observe teaching, learning and assessments and to look at learners’ work. We met with learners, senior leaders, managers and teachers. We reviewed key documents, including the services’ most recent self- assessment report and development plans, and documents related to safeguarding. We also analysed data on the performance of learners currently on programmes and considered the views of learners, staff and leaders.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion