Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Harefield Infant School

Inspected 8 Jun 2017 · published 18 Jul 2017 · URN 102382

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    8 Jun 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Avtar Sherri

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    UB9 6BT

  • Name on report verified

    Harefield Infant School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 89% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveeffectivelyimprovedimprovinggood progressconsistentlysafe
Criticismconcernsbelowlowernot improving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1373w+84
  • What needs to improve98w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,459
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Bernadette Lloyd Harefield Infant School High Street Harefield Uxbridge UB9 6BT

p.1

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

Following my visit to the school on 8 June 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in December 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

The school continues to improve under your leadership and the leadership of the head of school. You, the head of school, middle leaders and governors work effectively as a team to ensure that pupils achieve well. In your role as the executive headteacher of Harefield Infant School and Harefield Junior School, you ensure that effective practice is shared to improve teaching. You also ensure that there is smooth transition for pupils when they join the junior school at the end of Year 2. For example, pupils in Year 5 read with Year 2 pupils to help improve their reading skills. The local authority thinks highly of you, acknowledging the work you do to support training programmes on improving leadership in other schools. The local authority is also complimentary about the work your leaders do with other schools on moderating pupils’ work to ensure that assessment procedures are accurate.

p.1

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

Leaders work closely with the children’s centre on the school’s site, providing training for parents on literacy and mathematics to support their children’s learning. This also ensures the effective transition of children who attend the children’s centre into your Nursery provision.

p.1

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

You provide strong and passionate leadership. Governors share your ambition, providing leaders with effective support and challenge to ensure continuous improvement. You know your parents well and have built a strong sense of community. The school has achieved several national awards, including for the work you do to ensure that your most-able pupils achieve well and your work with families to overcome any barriers to learning. Parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, were overwhelmingly supportive of the school’s leadership. They used words such as ‘fantastic’ and ‘amazing’ to describe the school.

p.1

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

You have been relentless in your approach to improving the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, and provide your staff with effective training and support to improve. You have established a stable team of staff and their morale is high. You have rightly identified that improving the attainment and progress of pupils in phonics (letters and the sounds they represent) is a school priority.

p.2

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

At the time of the previous inspection, the outside learning area for children in the early years was highlighted as an area where the school needed to improve. Since that time, you and your leadership team have been effective in improving the outside area. It is well equipped and supports all areas of children’s learning. It is a fun place for children to learn. Under your leadership, a successful ‘Forest School’ has been created as an extension to the outdoor learning area. Children love the Forest School, where they have plenty of opportunities to explore their surroundings, be imaginative and extend their understanding of the world.

p.2

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

The other area for improvement highlighted in the previous inspection was to do with developing the skills of boys in writing. At the end of Year 2 in 2016, the overall standards in writing were higher than found nationally. A higher proportion of boys achieved the expected standard in writing compared with boys nationally. Leaders are predicting standards to rise in writing overall this year. However, you acknowledge that writing can be improved further, particularly for some of the lower-attaining boys.

p.2

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

Leaders and governors ensure that all safeguarding arrangements are in place and are fit for purpose. There is a strong culture of vigilance to ensure that safeguarding is effective. All the vetting checks on the suitability of staff and volunteers are carried out rigorously. Safeguarding is central to the work of the governing body and governors regularly check the school’s work to ensure that pupils are kept safe.

p.2

Short inspection of Harefield Infant School

Staff, including governors, receive regular and relevant training about safeguarding and child protection procedures. Staff know how to respond to concerns about a child’s safety and welfare. You use the school’s website well to inform and signpost parents to other websites that they can access to keep their children safe, including when online at home. Pupils told me that they ‘always feel safe at school’. Pupils said that staff keep them safe and they are taught to keep themselves safe, for example when using the internet. All parents who responded to Parent View agreed that their children are kept safe. You work extremely well with external agencies and vulnerable families to ensure the safety and welfare of pupils. You ensure that records are detailed and of high quality. Leaders make referrals to external agencies quickly and effectively.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The first focus for this inspection was how effectively leaders are diminishing the differences in attainment between disadvantaged pupils and other pupils nationally in reading, writing, phonics and early years. At the end of 2016, disadvantaged pupils did not achieve as well as other pupils nationally in reading and writing in key stage 1. When compared with other pupils nationally, disadvantaged pupils’ attainment was lower in the Year 1 phonics screening check and for the proportion of children achieving a good level of development in the early years.  Leaders ensure that the progress of individual pupils and groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, is monitored frequently. Teachers know their pupils well and support their learning effectively. Leaders have been effective in targeting disadvantaged pupils and providing them with individual and small group support to ensure that they achieve well. The schools’ current information

p.3

Inspection findings

and work in pupils’ books show that disadvantaged pupils are making good progress in reading, writing, phonics and in the early years. The governing body ensures that pupil premium funding is used well.  The second focus of this inspection was on boys’ writing. Boys’ writing is improving. The school’s current assessment information and work in pupils’ books show that boys are making good progress. The Forest School, for example, enthuses boys to write about scientific investigations and brings their writing alive.  In the early years, the woodwork benches encourage boys to make shapes and objects out of wood. This motivates them to write about what they have made. Although boys’ writing is improving, it is not improving rapidly for some of the lower-attaining boys when compared with their classmates. Pupils’ books show that sometimes they do not write at length to practise and improve their writing

p.3

Inspection findings

skills.  The third focus of this inspection was on how effectively leaders have improved the quality of teaching in phonics. In 2016, the proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard in the phonics screening check at the end of Year 1 was below the national average, particularly for disadvantaged pupils.  There is ongoing and increasingly effective training for staff. Pupils who are not making the progress they should in phonics are quickly identified for individual support. Some strong teaching of phonics was observed during the inspection; pupils used their understanding of letter sounds in their reading and writing.  Pupils who were listened to reading demonstrated their knowledge of phonics when reading difficult or unfamiliar words. However, you acknowledge that the teaching of phonics needs to be consistently strong to ensure that pupils, particularly disadvantaged pupils, achieve the expected standard in the phonics

p.3

Inspection findings

screening check at the end of Year 1.  My final line of enquiry focused on attendance. This was because it has been below the national average, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Leaders have worked effectively to improve attendance, particularly through working with parents. As a result, attendance has improved and is now in line with the national average. However, although attendance has improved for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, the attendance of disadvantaged pupils remains below average. You have targeted this as an area for improvement so that disadvantaged pupils can make consistently strong progress.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 pupils, particularly lower-attaining boys, improve their writing skills  the quality of teaching in phonics is consistently strong so that a greater proportion of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, achieve the expected standard in the phonics screening check at the end of Year 1  the attendance of disadvantaged pupils improves quickly towards the national average.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hillingdon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

 I met the executive headteacher, the head of school, middle leaders, the chair of the governing body and four other governors. I met with a local authority representative and the school’s improvement partner. I also met a group of pupils from key stage 1.  I observed learning in key stages 1 and 2 and in early years with leaders, looking at pupils’ books. I spoke with pupils and heard them read.  I looked at the schools’ information on attendance, safeguarding and recruitment procedures. I also reviewed pupils’ progress information.  I took into account the views of 33 responses to Parent View. There were no responses to the staff survey or the pupil survey.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion