Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
St Matthew's Church Preschool
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
St Matthews Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP903968
- Inspection date verified
26 Jun 2017
- Inspectors verified
Ben Parsons
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BN11 4HB
- Name on report verified
St Matthew's Church Preschool
- URN verified
113726
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The manager has not ensured that all staff have a thorough understanding of changes in statutory safeguarding guidance. p.1
- Although staff have a clear understanding of what to do if they are concerned about a child, they are not fully up to date with wider aspects of safeguarding, such as the 'Prevent' duty. p.1
- Sometimes, staff do not organise changes in routine in the most effective way to include children and enable them to fully develop and extend their play. p.1
- Self-evaluation is not used effectively to identify and address key weaknesses. p.1
- The manager and staff have a clear understanding of how children learn, and they monitor their progress accurately. p.1
- They quickly identify and address any gaps in children's learning, including in different groups of children. p.1
- There are positive systems to provide additional support for funded children, and all children make good progress from their developmental starting points. p.1
- They are positive role models for children and help them to build trusting attachments. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding4
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 775
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Matthew's Church Preschool St Matthews Church Hall, 101 Tarring Road, WORTHING, West Sussex, BN11 4HB
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 26 June 2017 6 May 2014
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2
p.1
3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Good 2
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The manager has not ensured that all staff have a thorough understanding of changes in statutory safeguarding guidance. Although staff have a clear understanding of what to do if they are concerned about a child, they are not fully up to date with wider aspects of safeguarding, such as the 'Prevent' duty. Sometimes, staff do not organise changes in routine in the most effective way to include children and enable them to fully develop and extend their play. Self-evaluation is not used effectively to identify and address key weaknesses.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The manager and staff have a clear understanding of how children learn, and they monitor their progress accurately. They quickly identify and address any gaps in children's learning, including in different groups of children. There are positive systems to provide additional support for funded children, and all children make good progress from their developmental starting points. Staff are welcoming, caring and kind. They are positive role models for children and help them to build trusting attachments. Children enjoy their time at the pre-school. There are effective partnerships with professionals, parents and local schools. For example, staff make good use of the knowledge and expertise of speech therapists. They work together to help further support children who need extra help with their communication and language skills. All children are well supported in their learning.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
improve systems for monitoring the effectiveness of staff's understanding of government guidance, such as the 'Prevent' duty and how to implement it fully. 26/07/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
manage planned changes in routines more effectively and help minimise interruptions to children's play make better use of self-evaluation to identify and addresses areas of weakness effectively.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed teaching practices and the impact these have on children's learning. The inspector held discussions with the manager, staff, children and parents. The inspector read some of the setting's documentation, including the safeguarding policy and procedures. The inspector sampled children's development information and records. The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager and discussed children's play, learning and progress.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The manager has a secure and up-to-date understanding of all safeguarding issues. Staff confidently recognise the signs of abuse, knowing what actions to take. However, the manager does not monitor staff's understanding closely to ensure that all staff fully understand how to protect children from extremist views. This does not have a significant detrimental impact on children's well-being. Safeguarding is effective. Staff help engage parents in their children's learning well, such as by providing home-reading and activity packs. Self-evaluation is not fully effective. However, the manager does make some positive improvements to the provision, overall. She offers support and coaching to staff to help improve their teaching, such as through observations of their practice and further training. For example, after recent training staff have improved their understanding of the different ways children learn and how to support them further through planning.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
Staff use information gained from parents and their own observations to help build a detailed understanding of each child's individual learning style. They consistently provide interesting and challenging activities. For example, children enjoy playing a game where they use rods to carefully hook toy fish. Staff skilfully help extend children's learning, such as by encouraging younger children to organise the fish by colour and older children to count them and compare quantities. Staff support children's communication and thinking skills well. For instance, they start plenty of conversations and consistently ask thought- provoking questions, encouraging children's ideas and ability to solve problems.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Not all staff know how to identify extremist views and prevent children from being drawn into these. However, they know to go to the well-trained manager for advice and to share concerns, which limits the impact on children's well-being. Children enjoy regular opportunities to be active. For example, they skilfully kick balls to each other in the garden and climb trees. However, staff often stop children's play suddenly during the day, not giving them the chance to bring their play to a natural end. Children eat healthy snacks and confidently talk about the benefits of healthy food on their bodies. Children behave well. They are kind, considerate and sociable and make positive friendships.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
Children are well-motivated and enthusiastic learners. They confidently write their name on finished drawings and know the letter sounds. Children have positive self-esteem. They express themselves well and proudly stand at the front of the group and talk about toys they have brought in from home. Children enjoy creative activities and pay good attention to detail, such as when creating models with household items. They happily explore musical instruments and are curious about the sounds they can make. Children are willing to give things a go and quickly gain the skills needed for their future learning.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 113726 Local authority West Sussex Inspection number 1068400 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 40 Number of children on roll 75 Name of registered person St Matthews Pre-School Committee
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 6 May 2014 Telephone number 01903 218071
p.4
reference number
St Matthew's Church Preschool opened in 1973. The pre-school operates from St Matthew's Church Hall in Worthing, West Sussex. It is open between 9am and 3pm each weekday, during term time only. The committee employs 10 staff, all of whom hold relevant qualifications. Of these, one has early years professional status, one holds a qualification at level 6, seven hold qualifications at level 3, and one is qualified at level 2. The nursery receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion