Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Matilda Community Day Nursery

Inspected 3 May 2017 · published 25 May 2017 · URN 119588

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Christine Lamey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Matilda Community Day Nursery

  • Group reference verified

    RP517625

  • Inspection date verified

    3 May 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Lamey

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    E1W 1LQ

  • Name on report verified

    Matilda Community Day Nursery

  • URN verified

    119588

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 37% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconsistentlyenjoyconfidentwarmtrusting relationshipsgood progresseffectivelyeffective
Criticismnot robustbreachfailedweaknessesweakerconcernnot alwaysvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings47w0
  • What needs to improve705w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
713
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Matilda Community Day Nursery St Katherines Way, London, E1W 1LQ

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 3 May 2017 31 March 2015

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 Leaders and managers do not have a firm understanding of events and matters that must be reported to Ofsted. Ofsted has not received the information needed to determine the suitability of all committee members. This is also a breach of the Childcare Register requirements.  Leaders do not use supervision and evaluation of staff's teaching and interaction effectively enough to identify, and take action to improve, weaker practice to ensure that teaching and assessment is consistently good.  The system for self-evaluation is not robust enough to identify and address areas where improvement is needed.  Staff do not make good use of opportunities that arise to help children understand the benefits of following a healthy diet.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children benefit well from daily physical exercise and make good use of the well- resourced and secure outdoor learning environment.  Children have formed good relationships with staff, who provide them with reassurance and comfort at appropriate times. Parents say they feel included and value the support and guidance offered by staff to help their children settle and progress.  Staff provide a well-resourced environment that enables children to make free choices about their play. Most children are curious, enjoy exploring and play well together.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure Ofsted is provided with all the information needed to determine the suitability of all committee members 03/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 improve the process of mentoring and coaching staff to raise the quality of teaching and assessment to a consistently good level 03/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 strengthen the effectiveness of self-evaluation to ensure it targets the areas for improvement accurately and enhances outcomes for children  make better use of opportunities to help children understand the benefits of following a balanced diet.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed staff's interaction with children during a range of activities, indoors and outdoors.  The inspector spoke with the manager, staff and children at appropriate times.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector spoke to parents and took account of their views.  The inspector sampled a wide range of documentation, including staff suitability checks, children's development records and attendance registers.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

The provider has failed to supply Ofsted with the relevant information needed to determine the suitability of all committee members. However, this does not have a significant impact on children's safety as the committee members do not have unsupervised access to children. Staff understand how to recognise possible signs and symptoms that may raise cause for concern and are confident in the procedures to follow. Safeguarding is effective. The systems for self-evaluation are not robust enough to identify all areas where improvement is needed. Parents speak highly of the warm relationships between children and staff and the improvements that have been made within the nursery.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Although staff make observations and assessments of children's development, they do not always accurately identify the key areas for what all children need to learn next. However, children have many opportunities to learn about the world around them. For example, they recall the lifecycle of a butterfly during story time. The quality of teaching is variable. For example, opportunities to help to develop children's imagination, communication and language further are missed during some activities. Staff organise the environment well. Children are able to make choices in their play, for instance, as they freely access messy play, malleable materials and role-play resources.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

The nursery provides children with healthy food to choose from at mealtimes and water is available for children to serve themselves during the day. However, staff do not seize opportunities to extend further children's understanding about the importance of following a healthy diet. Suitable settling-in procedures ensure that children have time to develop their confidence. They have formed warm and trusting relationships with staff. Children are confident and sociable. For example, they enjoy sitting with their friends, listening to stories and happily join in with a familiar story read to them by another child. They all gleefully join in with the story and the actions.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Weaknesses in the quality of teaching mean that not all children are supported to make consistently good progress in their learning and development. However, children gain some basic skills to help prepare them for school. For example, they learn to appreciate books and enjoy taking part in story time, actions rhymes and songs. They learn to count and gain an understanding of simple mathematics during story time, messy play, and activities, such as counting ducks and sorting them into colour groups.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 119588 Local authority Tower Hamlets Inspection number 1089222 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 4 Total number of places 15 Number of children on roll 23 Name of registered person Matilda Community Day Nursery

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 31 March 2015 Telephone number 020 7480 6396

p.4

reference number

Matilda Community Day Nursery registered in 1992. The nursery is open Monday to Friday from 8am until 6pm and operates throughout the year. The nursery receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years. There are currently six staff, of whom five hold relevant childcare qualifications at level 2 or level 3.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion