Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Suffolk County Council in Suffolk

Inspected 14 Jun 2017 · published 5 Jul 2017 · URN SC037256

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

RI to be good

Deirdra Keating

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Suffolk County Council

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Jun 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deirdra Keating

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Name on report verified

    SC037256

  • URN verified

    SC037256

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallRI to be good
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementGood

13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−19Mixedmore positive than 71% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongimprovedpositivevery wellsafetrusting relationshipsfailureseffectively
Criticismconcernsat riskrequires improvementseriousunsafeharmnot yetfailed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2279w−11
  • What needs to improve276w−60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,519
longer than usual (typical 1899)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 50
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 1 SC037256 Registered provider: Suffolk County Council

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This local authority home provides care and accommodation for up to seven children aged between 11 and 18 years. The home looks after children who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

requires improvement to be good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

requires improvement to be good

The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Date of last inspection: 3 November 2016

p.1

requires improvement to be good

Overall judgement at last inspection: Sustained effectiveness

p.1

Enforcement action since last inspection

None Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 2

p.1

Key findings from this inspection

This children’s home requires improvement to be good because:

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 There continues to be a significant number of incidents of children going missing from the home.  The children regularly leave the home during the late evening, without permission. This poses risks in terms of peer influence, substance misuse and road safety.  Tensions remain between the children, who at times feel unsafe in the home. Although these tensions are decreasing, there are recent incidents that the children easily recall.  The analysis of the data relating to the incidents of children going missing from the home is not fully utilised.  The recruitment checks for new staff are not robust enough.  The manager has failed to notify Ofsted of two serious incidents in the home.

p.2

Key findings from this inspection

 The management of the home has improved. There is a concerted drive to make positive changes and to improve the children’s experiences.  The staff team is experienced and stable. It provides continuity of care and consistency of approach.  Attendance in education has improved for the majority of the children.  The children all benefit from good relationships with the staff.  Multi-agency working is strong. The management team has proactively promoted this. Work takes place with a wide range of external professionals to identify concerns and actions to reduce these.

p.2

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

03/11/2016 Interim Sustained effectiveness 20/07/2016 Full Requires improvement 09/03/2016 Interim Sustained effectiveness 03/11/2015 Full Requires improvement Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 3

p.2

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.3

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.

p.3

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure that staff—

p.3

Requirement Due date

assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child and help each child to understand how to keep safe. (Regulation 12(1)(2)(a)(i)(ii)) 30/06/2017

p.3

Requirement Due date

The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if there is any other incident relating to a child which the registered person considers to be serious. (Regulation 40(4)(e)) 30/06/2017

p.3

Recommendations

 Evaluation of missing from home incidents should be undertaken. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 45, paragraph 9.31) In particular, using the wide range of data available in the missing from home records, further develop the evaluation of these incidents to better inform the home’s understanding of them.  Ensure that recruitment, supervision and performance management of staff safeguards children and minimises potential risks to them. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 61, paragraph 13.1) This is with particular regard to ensuring that checks relating to the reasons for staff ceasing prior employment with children or vulnerable adults are explored effectively. Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 4

p.3

improvement to be good

The home provides care that is tailored to meet the children’s individual needs. The staff know the children well and create care plans that support them to make progress. These plans include an assessment of the risks that are pertinent to the child. Although these risks are identified, they often do not reduce after the child’s admission to the home, and for some children the risks have increased. One social worker said that a child had, ‘picked up some negative behaviours’, since coming to the home. Feedback from social workers in regard to progress is mixed. The feedback identifies concerns that several of the children are not making sufficient progress, and for some children, there has been a deterioration in their behaviour since their admission. This includes an increase in incidents of going missing and increased drug use in one instance. Despite the concentrated efforts of the staff, the culture of children going missing from the home

p.4

improvement to be good

continues. This places children at risk and hinders their overall progress.

p.4

improvement to be good

The r elationships between the staff and the children are good. The children are positive about the staff. One child said, ‘The staff are nice and always fair.’ A social worker spoke of good relationships. They said, ‘His key worker gets on very well with him and has come in on his days off to take him [child] to contact.’ Key-working sessions are regular and ensure that children are offered support, and that areas of difficulty are discussed and addressed. The majority of the children spoken to talked positively about being at the home. However, some of the children do raise some concerns about the hierarchy between the children, and some children causing damage to the home. There was little evidence of damage to the house because repairs and replacements are made in a timely manner.

p.4

improvement to be good

The house is in a residential area of the town. The environment is homely, and there is enough space for the children to spend time in groups or on their own. The children benefit from a choice of bedroom and decor. The house is clean and orderly. There is a new front door and new carpet tiling throughout the ground floor and stairway. The garden is established and includes a pleasant seating area and grassed area that the children use. This encourages children to spend time outside. The children can easily get into town to use the amenities or to meet up with peers.

p.4

improvement to be good

The children’s attendance in school has generally improved since the last inspection. All of the children have an education provision, and the staff work closely with the schools to ensure that barriers to attending are addressed. One child has just finished his GCSEs without any gaps in attendance. The children are supported to apply for further education courses at college. The staff encourage the children to meet the college’s entry criteria by working hard towards their exams. The staff celebrate the children’s school achievements. They took the children for a celebratory meal as the term ended, to acknowledge the children’s hard work and effort.

p.4

improvement to be good

The staff support the children’s psychological health well. The mental health support Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 5 team provides a consultancy service. This gives the staff direction and guidance in the care of children who display self-injurious behaviour or low mood. This has been successful in reducing the number of incidents for one child. Staff are fully aware of the triggers of the child’s behaviours, and they have built up trusting relationships that support the child during difficult periods. The staff work closely with an agency called Turning Point, which provides advice and support to children who are susceptible to substance misuse.

p.4

improvement to be good

The staff prepare the children for independence and support them to gain independent life skills. The use of a semi-independence flat in the home has been reviewed to ensure that all of the children get opportunities to cook and prepare meals with staff support.

p.5

improvement to be good

Transition work for the children leaving the home is planned well. The manager is proactive and works well within a multi-disciplinary team to ensure that future placements are given due thought and consideration.

p.5

improvement to be good

The children in this home do not all feel safe. Some of the children feel intimidated by others, and they are aware of the risks posed by other children. The children regularly leave the home and fail to return at agreed times. A number of these incidents have taken place at night. Although there has been a strong response to these incidents, for the majority of children, risk taking has increased.

p.5

improvement to be good

There are a high number of missing from home incidents. The number of incidents has increased each month since January 2017. In both April and May 2017, there were more incidents of children going missing than there were in total in the first three months of the year. The management team analyses these incidents on a monthly basis. These evaluations are helpful but could take better account of the available data to further inform the staff’s understanding of incidents and to influence subsequent planning.

p.5

improvement to be good

The management team works well with the local police and the local authority missing person coordinator. Neither the police nor the local authority have any concerns about the way in which the managers or the staff manage or respond to missing from home incidents. A police inspector said, ‘They work hard and we work well together. They have a very good understand of the children and their vulnerabilities. They run a really tight ship.’ Another professional commented, ‘I find them really good. We have had really good communication with all of the staff and particularly the manager.’ This good communication and working across agencies has driven an improvement in the home’s ability to access the records of return from missing interviews. The missing person coordinator identified the efforts of the staff and manager as being integral to this improvement. There is, however, less of an impact on reducing the number of missing

p.5

improvement to be good

from home incidents. The staff and associated professionals recognise that risk-taking behaviours have increased for some children since they arrived at the home. Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 6 Some of the children are currently at risk of child sexual exploitation. The incidents for these children have reduced, although they remain at high risk. Staff work well with local project workers and support groups to educate children and to help them to understand their particular vulnerabilities. A number of the children smoke tobacco, and some smoke other substances. Staff use a drug support agency to provide direct support to children and to guide staff in helping the children to become aware of the risks involved.

p.5

improvement to be good

Some of the children present with high-risk behaviours in respect of fire setting. There have been incidents when a child has lit a fire in their bedroom. In response, the manager has implemented a number of actions intended to reduce the risk. These include commissioning an independent fire risk assessment, and engagement with the local fire service to ensure that all of the children have received fire safety training. The individual risk assessments, although up to date, lack clarity in some areas. For example, they state that regular checks should take place but offer no indication as to how often this should be. They do not include reference to the need to undertake regular visual checks, although the staff, including the manager, understand this to be the approach. In addition, the incidents of fire setting in the house should have been notified to Ofsted. This would have influenced Ofsted’s response to subsequent notifications and the timing

p.6

improvement to be good

The incidents of bullying have reduced significantly. However, although bullying is not persistent, there are vulnerable children who remain intimidated by some of the other children. Vigilant staff always intervene early and make their presence known, and they monitor these situations. They facilitate resolution and good conflict management. This offers support and strategies to individuals.

p.6

improvement to be good

The staff have used 26 sanctions over a six-month period. These sanctions relate to four children. The sanctions are fair and proportionate. They are mainly in response to damage to the home or items in the home. The staff have provided a number of interventions that range from losing an activity or treat or financial reparation to clearing up with staff support. The staff offer key-work sessions and time with staff to help the children to resolve their pent-up feelings. This is good practice, demonstrating a non- punitive, individualised approach so that the children have an opportunity to make amends.

p.6

improvement to be good

Safeguarding arrangements are fully understood by the staff. Regular training keeps staff abreast of the procedures to protect the children. The staff team is professional and experienced. There have been no allegations about members of staff in the home.

p.6

improvement to be good

Safe recruitment checks are carried out on new staff prior to commencement of employment. Warner interviews are also carried out to provide an extra safeguard when making suitability decisions. The process of pre-employment checks includes verbal verification of references. However, there was no evidence to show that two of the written references that were reviewed during the inspection had been verbally verified. Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 7

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager has been in post since August 2015. He holds a level 4 qualification in residential childcare and a level 5 diploma in management. The manager benefits from a tiered management structure within the local authority. This provides a head of service who supports the manager.

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The children benefit from a staff team that is established and experienced. Staff receive the right training to equip them for their roles and undergo regular supervision with a deputy manager or the manager. This ensures that practice issues are explored and future training needs are identified.

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There is a strong drive to improve this service and to make changes to improve the children’s experiences. The manager has implemented several preventative work initiatives . He has inspired better ways of working with other professionals. He has actively set up an action group that provides local profiling and determines where potential concerns are in the locality. This collaborative working identifies risks to the children and looks at ways of reducing these. Challenge is made to local authorities when plans are not in the child’s best interests. The manager challenges other professionals who work with the home, and this has resulted in the consistent provision of return interviews for the children who have been missing from the home. The manager has developed confidence in his style of management. His challenges are effective and result in improvements to children’s experiences. Despite this targeted

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

drive, the impact has not yet reduced the risks to the children. This is reflected in the judgement grading.

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Since the last inspection, the manager has developed a new auditing tool to ensure that records read well and that all of the components are updated and reviewed by key staff. Additionally, the rota has been redesigned to ensure that at busy times the staff provide good levels of support. This is in response to the high number of incidents that occur during the late evening.

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Feedback from external professionals is mixed. The social workers were positive about the quality of the relationships that they have with the home and with the manager in particular. Despite this, there are concerns about behaviour, risk taking and progress in general. Although such incidents are managed well, there is no reduction. This limits progress and contributes to a culture where children are repeatedly being reported as missing from the home. Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 8

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.8

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 9

p.8

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Suffolk County Council, Endeavour House, Russell Road, Ipswich IP1 2BX

p.9

Inspector

Deirdra Keating, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC037256 10 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion