Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

MTO Nursery

Inspected 14 Jun 2017 · published 5 Jul 2017 · URN EY484135

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Shana Laffy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    MTO Nursery Limited

  • Group reference verified

    RP907327

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Jun 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Shana Laffy

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    N8 8ED

  • Name on report verified

    MTO Nursery

  • URN verified

    EY484135

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−26Mixedmore positive than 70% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyenjoystrongaccuratelysafeeffectivecaringaccurate
Criticisminadequateweaknessesineffectivefailedat riskweakbreachesnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings382w+6
  • Leadership235w−84
  • What needs to improve408w+35

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,011
about usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 25%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 26%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

MTO Nursery Unit 1-2, 44-54 Coleridge Road, Crouch End, London, N8 8ED

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 14 June 2017 Not applicable

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 Staff do not follow the nursery's procedure to minimise risks to children while on outings. They do not ensure they know how many children are on the trip, compromising their welfare.  Leaders do not make sure that children's hours of attendance are recorded accurately. This does not prioritise children's safety and well-being.  The provider has not made sure that the acting manager has a full and relevant level 3 qualification, in line with requirements set out by the Department for Education.  Leaders have not implemented appropriate systems for supervising staff to ensure they feel supported in their role and that the quality of teaching remains good. This has a negative impact on children's daily care and learning experiences.  Staff do not plan effectively or promote children's communication well enough. They miss opportunities to talk to children during a range of activities to help promote their

p.1

This provision is inadequate

language development. Children do not make good enough progress in their learning.  Leaders have not used self-evaluation effectively to identify areas for development. Furthermore, aspects of partnerships with parents are not fully effective in ensuring a two-way flow of communication to develop consistency in children's care.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Staff build on children's physical skills and help them to enjoy exercising and staying healthy. For example, toddlers join in with yoga activities and explore movement.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure appropriate risk assessments for outings are carried out effectively by staff, to keep children safe at all times 29/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure an accurate record of children's attendance is maintained, to protect children's well-being 29/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure the manager holds a full, relevant and recognised level 3 qualification, as defined by the Department for Education, in line with requirements for the early years sector 29/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 improve systems for supporting staff and provide regular opportunities for supervisory meetings, to develop staff's knowledge and teaching practice effectively 29/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 develop staff's understanding of how to plan effective support for children's learning, particularly in relation to their communication and language development, to help each child make better progress in their learning. 29/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 develop the effectiveness of self-evaluation to identify any weaknesses in practice and management and to improve the quality of the nursery  strengthen links with parents and develop systems for communicating with them about changes in the nursery, to build strong partnerships to meet children's needs.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed teaching and learning inside and on a planned outing.  The inspector spoke to parents to gain their views and experiences of the setting.  The inspector spoke with children and staff at appropriate times during the inspection and held a meeting with the provider.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector looked at a sample of the children's learning records, staff observations and planning, and a range of policies and documentation, such as suitability of staff and safeguarding procedures.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is ineffective. Leadership is inadequate. Leaders have failed to ensure that staff carry out important risk assessments, such as counting how many children they are taking out to the park. This compromises children's welfare. Furthermore, leaders have not made sure that staff accurately record children's departure time from the nursery. This places staff and children at risk, should an emergency arise. Leaders have not ensured that the manager holds a full and relevant level 3 qualification in working with early years children, as required. Although the manager is in the process of further study, this is not fully completed, which means she is not fully qualified to fulfil her role at present. Leaders do not offer all staff appropriate support and supervision in their roles. Staff attend some basic training, but this has not been fully effective in maintaining good teaching practice. Leaders have begun to look at the overall progress made by groups of children to help

p.4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

identify any learning trends. Partnerships with other professionals are in place. For example, leaders link with speech and language therapists to support children with additional needs. However, partnerships with parents are inconsistent. Some parents speak highly of the staff team and others have noticed a recent decline in communication and structure at the setting. Self-evaluation is weak. Although some breaches have been identified by leaders prior to inspection, they have not acted upon these quickly enough.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Staff do not support children's speaking and listening skills effectively or build their understanding of language through everyday tasks or activities. For example, staff do not take opportunities to talk with children and extend their thinking skills, such as during planned tasks or on outings. Due to a proportionally high number of temporary staff in the setting, not all staff have the appropriate knowledge and skills to plan for children's ongoing learning. Overall, staff support child-initiated play well and provide a selection of resources for children to explore. Staff encourage children to be creative. For example, children enjoy collage materials and printing with fruit. Older children benefit from opportunities to develop sound awareness. For example, they join in with a music session, listening carefully for environmental noises. Staff reflect broadly on children's achievements and share their daily observations effectively with parents.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Staff do not prioritise children's well-being adequately. Staff do not follow nursery procedures to keep children safe on trips and do not carry out risk assessments to ensure they minimise the risk of children getting lost. During the inspection, they did not count the number of children they were taking with them to the park or take the record of their attendance. Staff are friendly towards children and comfort those who are new and settling in. However, due to a high turnover of staff and the number of agency workers caring for children, these staff do not know the children well enough to respond to their individual needs. Staff provide nutritious meals and encourage children to make healthy choices and try things for themselves. Children behave well. They are kind to one another, forming friendships with their peers.

p.4

Outcomes for children require improvement

Children gain some good physical skills, and older children enjoy drawing. Children engage in role play and make up imaginary games with their friends. Younger children explore their senses. For example, they play in the sand pit at the park. However, due to inconsistencies in teaching and planning of activities, not all children make good enough progress in their learning and are not prepared as well as possible for school or future learning.

p.5

Setting details

Unique reference number EY484135 Local authority Haringey Inspection number 1010493 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 48 Number of children on roll 46 Name of registered person MTO Nursery Limited

p.6

reference number

Date of previous inspection Not applicable Telephone number 02083405522

p.6

reference number

MTO Nursery registered in 2015. The nursery is situated in the London Borough of Haringey. The nursery operates from 7.30am to 6.30pm, for most of the year. The nursery receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years. The nursery employs eight members of staff, six of whom hold relevant childcare qualifications.

p.6

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.7

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion